Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-12-06 Thread Yinghai Lu

so first hunk of the patch doesn't have nothing in common with second ,
and it is different disable acpi_irqs than disable all acpi,
callacpi_disable_pci () is acpi=off.


pci=noacpi mean it will not use acpi for pci bus scan and irq routing setting.
acpi=noirq mean it will only not use irq routing setting.

the problem is that old code in acpi is processing pci= for pci subsystem.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-12-06 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 15:23 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi" 

Remove "pci=noacpi" parse in acpi/boot.c, because it is duplicated 
with that in pci/common.c.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index d12fb97..6d62dd1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1285,15 +1293,6 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 }
 early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
 
-/* FIXME: Using pci= for an ACPI parameter is a travesty. */
-static int __init parse_pci(char *arg)
-{
-   if (arg && strcmp(arg, "noacpi") == 0)
-   acpi_disable_pci();
-   return 0;
-}
-early_param("pci", parse_pci);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
 static int __init parse_acpi_skip_timer_override(char *arg)
 {
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/common.c b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
index cdfcf97..6d5b70a 100644
--- a/arch/i386/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ char * __devinit  pcibios_setup(char *str)
}
 #endif
else if (!strcmp(str, "noacpi")) {
-   acpi_noirq_set();
+   acpi_disable_pci();
return NULL;
}
else if (!strcmp(str, "noearly")) {


/include/asm-x86_64/acpi.h (and asm-i386)
acpi_disable_pci : 

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static inline void acpi_noirq_set(void) { acpi_noirq = 1; }
static inline void acpi_disable_pci(void)
{
acpi_pci_disabled = 1;
acpi_noirq_set();
}
#else   /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_ioapic 0
static inline void acpi_noirq_set(void) { }
static inline void acpi_disable_pci(void) { }

so first hunk of the patch doesn't have nothing in common with second ,
and it is different disable acpi_irqs than disable all acpi,
callacpi_disable_pci () is acpi=off.

My main goal when I read this mail was delete acpi=noirq or pci=noacpi
because is a redundant boot option which just make confusions.  

I have to go (sleep) 

Thanks,

-- 
Sérgio M.B.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-12-06 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 15:23 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi 

Remove pci=noacpi parse in acpi/boot.c, because it is duplicated 
with that in pci/common.c.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index d12fb97..6d62dd1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1285,15 +1293,6 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 }
 early_param(acpi, parse_acpi);
 
-/* FIXME: Using pci= for an ACPI parameter is a travesty. */
-static int __init parse_pci(char *arg)
-{
-   if (arg  strcmp(arg, noacpi) == 0)
-   acpi_disable_pci();
-   return 0;
-}
-early_param(pci, parse_pci);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
 static int __init parse_acpi_skip_timer_override(char *arg)
 {
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/common.c b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
index cdfcf97..6d5b70a 100644
--- a/arch/i386/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ char * __devinit  pcibios_setup(char *str)
}
 #endif
else if (!strcmp(str, noacpi)) {
-   acpi_noirq_set();
+   acpi_disable_pci();
return NULL;
}
else if (!strcmp(str, noearly)) {


/include/asm-x86_64/acpi.h (and asm-i386)
acpi_disable_pci : 

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static inline void acpi_noirq_set(void) { acpi_noirq = 1; }
static inline void acpi_disable_pci(void)
{
acpi_pci_disabled = 1;
acpi_noirq_set();
}
#else   /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_ioapic 0
static inline void acpi_noirq_set(void) { }
static inline void acpi_disable_pci(void) { }

so first hunk of the patch doesn't have nothing in common with second ,
and it is different disable acpi_irqs than disable all acpi,
callacpi_disable_pci () is acpi=off.

My main goal when I read this mail was delete acpi=noirq or pci=noacpi
because is a redundant boot option which just make confusions.  

I have to go (sleep) 

Thanks,

-- 
Sérgio M.B.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-12-06 Thread Yinghai Lu

so first hunk of the patch doesn't have nothing in common with second ,
and it is different disable acpi_irqs than disable all acpi,
callacpi_disable_pci () is acpi=off.


pci=noacpi mean it will not use acpi for pci bus scan and irq routing setting.
acpi=noirq mean it will only not use irq routing setting.

the problem is that old code in acpi is processing pci= for pci subsystem.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-11-27 Thread Lu, Yinghai

-Original Message-
From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 4:22 PM

>Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
>isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
>I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
>needs very careful double checking.

I double check that, we don't need the parser in
arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c for 
pci=noapci.

Actually, pcibios_setup in arch/i386/kernel/pci/common.c that process
pci=noacpi will be
called by pci_setup in drivers/pci/pci.c, and 
early_param("pci", pci_setup);

YH


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-11-27 Thread Lu, Yinghai

-Original Message-
From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 4:22 PM

Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
needs very careful double checking.

I double check that, we don't need the parser in
arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c for 
pci=noapci.

Actually, pcibios_setup in arch/i386/kernel/pci/common.c that process
pci=noacpi will be
called by pci_setup in drivers/pci/pci.c, and 
early_param(pci, pci_setup);

YH


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-11-26 Thread Yinghai Lu

On 27 Nov 2006 01:22:21 +0100, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:23:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>

Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
needs very careful double checking.


I will double check that

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-11-26 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:23:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 

Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
needs very careful double checking.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi"

2006-11-26 Thread Yinghai Lu


[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for "pci=noacpi" 

Remove "pci=noacpi" parse in acpi/boot.c, because it is duplicated 
with that in pci/common.c.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index d12fb97..6d62dd1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1285,15 +1293,6 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 }
 early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
 
-/* FIXME: Using pci= for an ACPI parameter is a travesty. */
-static int __init parse_pci(char *arg)
-{
-	if (arg && strcmp(arg, "noacpi") == 0)
-		acpi_disable_pci();
-	return 0;
-}
-early_param("pci", parse_pci);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
 static int __init parse_acpi_skip_timer_override(char *arg)
 {
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/common.c b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
index cdfcf97..6d5b70a 100644
--- a/arch/i386/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ char * __devinit  pcibios_setup(char *str)
 	}
 #endif
 	else if (!strcmp(str, "noacpi")) {
-		acpi_noirq_set();
+		acpi_disable_pci();
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	else if (!strcmp(str, "noearly")) {


[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-11-26 Thread Yinghai Lu


[PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi 

Remove pci=noacpi parse in acpi/boot.c, because it is duplicated 
with that in pci/common.c.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index d12fb97..6d62dd1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1285,15 +1293,6 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 }
 early_param(acpi, parse_acpi);
 
-/* FIXME: Using pci= for an ACPI parameter is a travesty. */
-static int __init parse_pci(char *arg)
-{
-	if (arg  strcmp(arg, noacpi) == 0)
-		acpi_disable_pci();
-	return 0;
-}
-early_param(pci, parse_pci);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
 static int __init parse_acpi_skip_timer_override(char *arg)
 {
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/common.c b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
index cdfcf97..6d5b70a 100644
--- a/arch/i386/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/pci/common.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ char * __devinit  pcibios_setup(char *str)
 	}
 #endif
 	else if (!strcmp(str, noacpi)) {
-		acpi_noirq_set();
+		acpi_disable_pci();
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	else if (!strcmp(str, noearly)) {


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-11-26 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:23:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
 

Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
needs very careful double checking.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: remove duplicated parser for pci=noacpi

2006-11-26 Thread Yinghai Lu

On 27 Nov 2006 01:22:21 +0100, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:23:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:


Are you sure it's correct? The drivers/pci pci= parsing
isn't early and there tend to be nasty ordering issues.
I can't see where it would go wrong here, but it probably
needs very careful double checking.


I will double check that

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/