Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: rockchip: pm: Mark init functions __init

2019-04-12 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Freitag, 12. April 2019, 01:21:54 CEST schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> The functions rk3288_config_bootdata() and rk3288_suspend_init() are
> only called in the context of rockchip_suspend_init() which is already
> marked __init.  We can mark them __init too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson 

applied for 5.2

Thanks
Heiko




[PATCH 2/5] ARM: rockchip: pm: Mark init functions __init

2019-04-11 Thread Douglas Anderson
The functions rk3288_config_bootdata() and rk3288_suspend_init() are
only called in the context of rockchip_suspend_init() which is already
marked __init.  We can mark them __init too.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson 
---

 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c
index 0592534e0b88..065b09e6f1eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline u32 rk3288_l2_config(void)
return l2ctlr;
 }
 
-static void rk3288_config_bootdata(void)
+static void __init rk3288_config_bootdata(void)
 {
rkpm_bootdata_cpusp = rk3288_bootram_phy + (SZ_4K - 8);
rkpm_bootdata_cpu_code = __pa_symbol(cpu_resume);
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void rk3288_suspend_finish(void)
pr_err("%s: Suspend finish failed\n", __func__);
 }
 
-static int rk3288_suspend_init(struct device_node *np)
+static int __init rk3288_suspend_init(struct device_node *np)
 {
struct device_node *sram_np;
struct resource res;
-- 
2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog