Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-03-20 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Hello, Peter.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
> > then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
> > return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.
> 
> No real objection I suppose, but did you actually see this go wrong?

No, I found it while I review whole scheduler code.
Thanks.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-03-20 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Hello, Peter.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:02:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
 On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
  After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
  then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
  return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.
 
 No real objection I suppose, but did you actually see this go wrong?

No, I found it while I review whole scheduler code.
Thanks.

 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-03-19 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
> then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
> return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.

No real objection I suppose, but did you actually see this go wrong?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-03-19 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
 After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
 then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
 return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.

No real objection I suppose, but did you actually see this go wrong?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-02-13 Thread Joonsoo Kim
After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.

Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri 
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim 

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6f72851..0c6aaf6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5515,10 +5515,10 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum 
cpu_idle_type idle)
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, )) {
/*
-* We've pulled tasks over so either we're no
-* longer idle.
+* We've pulled tasks over so either we may
+* be no longer idle.
 */
-   idle = CPU_NOT_IDLE;
+   idle = idle_cpu(cpu) ? CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE;
}
sd->last_balance = jiffies;
}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()

2013-02-13 Thread Joonsoo Kim
After commit 88b8dac0, dst-cpu can be changed in load_balance(),
then we can't know cpu_idle_type of dst-cpu when load_balance()
return positive. So, add explicit cpu_idle_type checking.

Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri va...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6f72851..0c6aaf6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5515,10 +5515,10 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum 
cpu_idle_type idle)
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd-last_balance + interval)) {
if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, balance)) {
/*
-* We've pulled tasks over so either we're no
-* longer idle.
+* We've pulled tasks over so either we may
+* be no longer idle.
 */
-   idle = CPU_NOT_IDLE;
+   idle = idle_cpu(cpu) ? CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE;
}
sd-last_balance = jiffies;
}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/