Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:31:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >  wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >> > let me know.
> > >> >
> > >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> > >>
> > >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> > ...
> > >> xtensa - failed
> > >
> > > Are these all new failures?
> > 
> > Build log says
> > 
> > /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> > Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> > make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> > 
> > which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
> 
> With same toolchain and same script upstream commit
> 123f15e669d5a5a2e2f260ba4a5fc2efd93df20e solves the problem. Tested
> after applying it on v3.10.88.
> 
> Greg - This will apply directly, backporting not required. Do you want
> me to send to you and stable (for 3.10.89) or will you pick it up?

Now applied, sorry I missed this before now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:31:51PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >  wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >> > let me know.
> > >> >
> > >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> > >>
> > >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> > ...
> > >> xtensa - failed
> > >
> > > Are these all new failures?
> > 
> > Build log says
> > 
> > /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> > Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> > make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> > 
> > which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
> 
> With same toolchain and same script upstream commit
> 123f15e669d5a5a2e2f260ba4a5fc2efd93df20e solves the problem. Tested
> after applying it on v3.10.88.
> 
> Greg - This will apply directly, backporting not required. Do you want
> me to send to you and stable (for 3.10.89) or will you pick it up?

Now applied, sorry I missed this before now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-14 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>  wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> > let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> >>
> >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> ...
> >> xtensa - failed
> >
> > Are these all new failures?
> 
> Build log says
> 
> /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> 
> which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

With same toolchain and same script upstream commit
123f15e669d5a5a2e2f260ba4a5fc2efd93df20e solves the problem. Tested
after applying it on v3.10.88.

Greg - This will apply directly, backporting not required. Do you want
me to send to you and stable (for 3.10.89) or will you pick it up?

BTW, git bisect is just awesome. I didn't know before that I can use a
test script and it will automatically bisect and test. My sunday not
spoiled yet got the result. :)

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-14 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>  wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> > let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> >>
> >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> ...
> >> xtensa - failed
> >
> > Are these all new failures?
> 
> Build log says
> 
> /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> 
> which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

With same toolchain and same script upstream commit
123f15e669d5a5a2e2f260ba4a5fc2efd93df20e solves the problem. Tested
after applying it on v3.10.88.

Greg - This will apply directly, backporting not required. Do you want
me to send to you and stable (for 3.10.89) or will you pick it up?

BTW, git bisect is just awesome. I didn't know before that I can use a
test script and it will automatically bisect and test. My sunday not
spoiled yet got the result. :)

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/12/2015 10:36 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> >>On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> 
> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> >>...
> xtensa - failed
> >>>
> >>>Are these all new failures?
> >>
> >>Build log says
> >>
> >>/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> >>Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> >>make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
> >But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
> >3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
> >morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
> >doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.
> >
> 
> The question here is if this is a new failure in 3.10, not if it has been
> fixed in a later kernel version.
> 
> For my part I used to report such persistent failures. However, I find it
> useless and even confusing to report "yep, still fails", unless there is
> a plan to fix it, so I don't do that anymore. Otherwise it is just a waste
> of test resources, and it makes it difficult to understand the test summary.
> 
> If I _do_ report such failures, I track down the cause and the fix, and ask
> the branch maintainer to apply the necessary patch(es).
I am trying to do the same with linux-next now. And as you suggested in
another reply just tried a clean build with 3.10.87 and that also failed.
I will find out the fix which caused it to build properly for 3.14 for
me.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/12/2015 10:36 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

...

xtensa - failed


Are these all new failures?


Build log says

/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1

which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.



The question here is if this is a new failure in 3.10, not if it has been
fixed in a later kernel version.

For my part I used to report such persistent failures. However, I find it
useless and even confusing to report "yep, still fails", unless there is
a plan to fix it, so I don't do that anymore. Otherwise it is just a waste
of test resources, and it makes it difficult to understand the test summary.

If I _do_ report such failures, I track down the cause and the fix, and ask
the branch maintainer to apply the necessary patch(es).

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:55:45AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> > 
> > cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> > 
> > cris - failed
> 
> Is this expected?
> 
> > s390 - failed
> 
> Is this expected?
> 
> > xtensa - failed
> 
> Are these all new failures?
Not sure. I just completed this test setup and testing stable for the
first time. Anyways, I will try to find out the fix and if that is
already in Linus tree I will send that to you before your next release.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/12/2015 08:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

i386 - pass
x86_64 - pass
alphacheck - pass
arm - pass
cris - failed


Is this expected?


I don't test this one.


m68k - pass
mips - pass
powerpc - pass
s390 - failed


Is this expected?


Yes.


sparc - pass
sparc64 - pass
tile - failed
tilegx - failed


Yes. Looks like it was fixed somewhere between 3.11 and 3.13,
though I did not track down the commit.


xtensa - failed




xtensa:allmodconfig builds for me, using my own toolchain.
I see that kind of failure if I build for one endianness,
then for the other, without cleaning up in between.

Guenter


Are these all new failures?

thanks,

greg k-h



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>  wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> > let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> >>
> >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> ...
> >> xtensa - failed
> >
> > Are these all new failures?
> 
> Build log says
> 
> /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> 
> which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Max Filippov 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
>> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
>>
>> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
...
>> xtensa - failed
>
> Are these all new failures?

Build log says

/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1

which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> 
> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> 
> i386 - pass
> x86_64 - pass
> alphacheck - pass
> arm - pass
> cris - failed

Is this expected?

> m68k - pass
> mips - pass
> powerpc - pass
> s390 - failed

Is this expected?

> sparc - pass
> sparc64 - pass
> tile - failed
> tilegx - failed
> xtensa - failed

Are these all new failures?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

i386 - pass
x86_64 - pass
alphacheck - pass
arm - pass
cris - failed
m68k - pass
mips - pass
powerpc - pass
s390 - failed
sparc - pass
sparc64 - pass
tile - failed
tilegx - failed
xtensa - failed

build report at https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/79959776

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/12/2015 10:36 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

...

xtensa - failed


Are these all new failures?


Build log says

/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1

which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.



The question here is if this is a new failure in 3.10, not if it has been
fixed in a later kernel version.

For my part I used to report such persistent failures. However, I find it
useless and even confusing to report "yep, still fails", unless there is
a plan to fix it, so I don't do that anymore. Otherwise it is just a waste
of test resources, and it makes it difficult to understand the test summary.

If I _do_ report such failures, I track down the cause and the fix, and ask
the branch maintainer to apply the necessary patch(es).

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Max Filippov 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
>> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
>>
>> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
...
>> xtensa - failed
>
> Are these all new failures?

Build log says

/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1

which looks like misconfigured toolchain.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>  wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> >> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> > let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> >>
> >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> ...
> >> xtensa - failed
> >
> > Are these all new failures?
> 
> Build log says
> 
> /home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> 
> which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/12/2015 10:36 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:22:39PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
> >>On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> 
> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> >>...
> xtensa - failed
> >>>
> >>>Are these all new failures?
> >>
> >>Build log says
> >>
> >>/home/travis/local/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/xtensa-linux/bin/xtensa-linux-objcopy:
> >>Unable to change endianness of input file(s)
> >>make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/boot/boot-elf/Image.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>which looks like misconfigured toolchain.
> >But the same script and same toolchain compiles properly for 4.1.7-rc1,
> >3.14.52-rc1 and also works for Linus tree (last tested yesterday
> >morning). I will see what has changed between 3.10 and 3.14 so that it
> >doesnot work for 3.10 but works for 3.14.
> >
> 
> The question here is if this is a new failure in 3.10, not if it has been
> fixed in a later kernel version.
> 
> For my part I used to report such persistent failures. However, I find it
> useless and even confusing to report "yep, still fails", unless there is
> a plan to fix it, so I don't do that anymore. Otherwise it is just a waste
> of test resources, and it makes it difficult to understand the test summary.
> 
> If I _do_ report such failures, I track down the cause and the fix, and ask
> the branch maintainer to apply the necessary patch(es).
I am trying to do the same with linux-next now. And as you suggested in
another reply just tried a clean build with 3.10.87 and that also failed.
I will find out the fix which caused it to build properly for 3.14 for
me.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/12/2015 08:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

i386 - pass
x86_64 - pass
alphacheck - pass
arm - pass
cris - failed


Is this expected?


I don't test this one.


m68k - pass
mips - pass
powerpc - pass
s390 - failed


Is this expected?


Yes.


sparc - pass
sparc64 - pass
tile - failed
tilegx - failed


Yes. Looks like it was fixed somewhere between 3.11 and 3.13,
though I did not track down the commit.


xtensa - failed




xtensa:allmodconfig builds for me, using my own toolchain.
I see that kind of failure if I build for one endianness,
then for the other, without cleaning up in between.

Guenter


Are these all new failures?

thanks,

greg k-h



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:55:45AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> > 
> > cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> > 
> > cris - failed
> 
> Is this expected?
> 
> > s390 - failed
> 
> Is this expected?
> 
> > xtensa - failed
> 
> Are these all new failures?
Not sure. I just completed this test setup and testing stable for the
first time. Anyways, I will try to find out the fix and if that is
already in Linus tree I will send that to you before your next release.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Sudip Mukherjee 
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.

cross_compiled with allmodconfig:

i386 - pass
x86_64 - pass
alphacheck - pass
arm - pass
cris - failed
m68k - pass
mips - pass
powerpc - pass
s390 - failed
sparc - pass
sparc64 - pass
tile - failed
tilegx - failed
xtensa - failed

build report at https://travis-ci.org/sudipm-mukherjee/parport/builds/79959776

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
> 
> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
> 
> i386 - pass
> x86_64 - pass
> alphacheck - pass
> arm - pass
> cris - failed

Is this expected?

> m68k - pass
> mips - pass
> powerpc - pass
> s390 - failed

Is this expected?

> sparc - pass
> sparc64 - pass
> tile - failed
> tilegx - failed
> xtensa - failed

Are these all new failures?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/11/2015 03:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.



Build results:
total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 70 pass: 70 fail: 0

Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Shuah Khan 
On 09/11/2015 04:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.88-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.88-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Linux 3.10.88-rc1

Yann Droneaud 
arm64/mm: Remove hack in mmap randomize layout

Horia Geant? 
crypto: caam - fix memory corruption in ahash_final_ctx

Bart Van Assche 
libfc: Fix fc_fcp_cleanup_each_cmd()

Alex Deucher 
drm/radeon: add new OLAND pci id

Michael Walle 
EDAC, ppc4xx: Access mci->csrows array elements properly

Richard Weinberger 
localmodconfig: Use Kbuild files too

Joe Thornber 
dm thin metadata: delete btrees when releasing metadata snapshot

Peter Zijlstra 
perf: Fix fasync handling on inherited events

Wanpeng Li 
mm/hwpoison: fix page refcount of unknown non LRU page

Manfred Spraul 
ipc/sem.c: update/correct memory barriers

Herton R. Krzesinski 
ipc,sem: fix use after free on IPC_RMID after a task using same semaphore 
set exits


-

Diffstat:

 Makefile |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 12 ++
 drivers/crypto/caam/caamhash.c   |  7 +++---
 drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c|  4 ++--
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c  | 19 ++--
 include/drm/drm_pciids.h |  1 +
 ipc/sem.c| 43 +---
 kernel/events/core.c | 12 --
 mm/memory-failure.c  |  2 ++
 scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl |  2 +-
 11 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.88-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Linux 3.10.88-rc1

Yann Droneaud 
arm64/mm: Remove hack in mmap randomize layout

Horia Geant? 
crypto: caam - fix memory corruption in ahash_final_ctx

Bart Van Assche 
libfc: Fix fc_fcp_cleanup_each_cmd()

Alex Deucher 
drm/radeon: add new OLAND pci id

Michael Walle 
EDAC, ppc4xx: Access mci->csrows array elements properly

Richard Weinberger 
localmodconfig: Use Kbuild files too

Joe Thornber 
dm thin metadata: delete btrees when releasing metadata snapshot

Peter Zijlstra 
perf: Fix fasync handling on inherited events

Wanpeng Li 
mm/hwpoison: fix page refcount of unknown non LRU page

Manfred Spraul 
ipc/sem.c: update/correct memory barriers

Herton R. Krzesinski 
ipc,sem: fix use after free on IPC_RMID after a task using same semaphore 
set exits


-

Diffstat:

 Makefile |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 12 ++
 drivers/crypto/caam/caamhash.c   |  7 +++---
 drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-thin-metadata.c|  4 ++--
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c  | 19 ++--
 include/drm/drm_pciids.h |  1 +
 ipc/sem.c| 43 +---
 kernel/events/core.c | 12 --
 mm/memory-failure.c  |  2 ++
 scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl |  2 +-
 11 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Guenter Roeck 

On 09/11/2015 03:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.



Build results:
total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 70 pass: 70 fail: 0

Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

2015-09-11 Thread Shuah Khan 
On 09/11/2015 04:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.88-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/