Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBIFS: add ubifs_err() to print error reason
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:08 -0600, Ben Shelton wrote: > On 11/11, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Pushed this, but made some amendments. > > > > Now all 4 are in the master branch. Would you please re-test them again > > and confirm that they are fine. Then I'll push them to the linux-next > > branch, unless you report that my amendments broke something. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Hi Artem, > > I pulled the four modified commits into my 3.18-rc3 branch and tested > with lockdep enabled. Everything looks good. OK, thank you! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBIFS: add ubifs_err() to print error reason
On 11/11, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Pushed this, but made some amendments. > > Now all 4 are in the master branch. Would you please re-test them again > and confirm that they are fine. Then I'll push them to the linux-next > branch, unless you report that my amendments broke something. > > Thank you! > Hi Artem, I pulled the four modified commits into my 3.18-rc3 branch and tested with lockdep enabled. Everything looks good. Thanks, Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBIFS: add ubifs_err() to print error reason
Pushed this, but made some amendments. Now all 4 are in the master branch. Would you please re-test them again and confirm that they are fine. Then I'll push them to the linux-next branch, unless you report that my amendments broke something. Thank you! On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 13:50 -0500, Ben Shelton wrote: > @@ -100,24 +100,32 @@ static const struct file_operations empty_fops; > static int create_xattr(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *host, > const struct qstr *nm, const void *value, int size) > { > - int err; > + int err, xattr_name_list_size; Renamed this to a shorter names_len. > - if (host_ui->xattr_cnt >= MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE) > + if (host_ui->xattr_cnt >= MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE) { > + ubifs_err("ubifs xattr_cnt %d exceeds MAX_XATTR_PER_NODE (%d)", > + host_ui->xattr_cnt, MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE); Improved this message - made it more user-friendly, and print the inode number. > + if (xattr_name_list_size > XATTR_LIST_MAX) { > + ubifs_err("xattr name list too large %d > %d", > + xattr_name_list_size, XATTR_LIST_MAX); > return -ENOSPC; Ditto. > > + if (err) > + ubifs_err("cannot initialize extended attribute, error %d", > + err); Refactored this message and added the inode number. Artem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 4/4] UBIFS: add ubifs_err() to print error reason
From: Subodh Nijsure This patch adds ubifs_err() output to some error paths to tell the user what's going on. Signed-off-by: Subodh Nijsure Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton Acked-by: Brad Mouring Acked-by: Terry Wilcox Acked-by: Gratian Crisan --- fs/ubifs/xattr.c | 20 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c index f844841..2b99e49 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c @@ -100,24 +100,32 @@ static const struct file_operations empty_fops; static int create_xattr(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *host, const struct qstr *nm, const void *value, int size) { - int err; + int err, xattr_name_list_size; struct inode *inode; struct ubifs_inode *ui, *host_ui = ubifs_inode(host); struct ubifs_budget_req req = { .new_ino = 1, .new_dent = 1, .new_ino_d = ALIGN(size, 8), .dirtied_ino = 1, .dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(host_ui->data_len, 8) }; - if (host_ui->xattr_cnt >= MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE) + if (host_ui->xattr_cnt >= MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE) { + ubifs_err("ubifs xattr_cnt %d exceeds MAX_XATTR_PER_NODE (%d)", + host_ui->xattr_cnt, MAX_XATTRS_PER_INODE); return -ENOSPC; + } /* * Linux limits the maximum size of the extended attribute names list * to %XATTR_LIST_MAX. This means we should not allow creating more * extended attributes if the name list becomes larger. This limitation * is artificial for UBIFS, though. */ - if (host_ui->xattr_names + host_ui->xattr_cnt + - nm->len + 1 > XATTR_LIST_MAX) + xattr_name_list_size = host_ui->xattr_names + host_ui->xattr_cnt + + nm->len + 1; + + if (xattr_name_list_size > XATTR_LIST_MAX) { + ubifs_err("xattr name list too large %d > %d", + xattr_name_list_size, XATTR_LIST_MAX); return -ENOSPC; + } err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &req); if (err) @@ -652,5 +660,9 @@ int ubifs_init_security(struct inode *dentry, struct inode *inode, &ubifs_initxattrs, 0); mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); + if (err) + ubifs_err("cannot initialize extended attribute, error %d", + err); + return err; } -- 2.1.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/