[PATCH 4.8 08/35] zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal

2016-12-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

--

From: Takashi Iwai 

commit 529e71e16403830ae0d737a66c55c5f360f3576b upstream.

The zram hot removal code calls idr_remove() even when zram_remove()
returns an error (typically -EBUSY).  This results in a leftover at the
device release, eventually leading to a crash when the module is
reloaded.

As described in the bug report below, the following procedure would
cause an Oops with zram:

 - provision three zram devices via modprobe zram num_devices=3
 - configure a size for each device
   + echo "1G" > /sys/block/$zram_name/disksize
 - mkfs and mount zram0 only
 - attempt to hot remove all three devices
   + echo 2 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 1 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
 - zram0 removal fails with EBUSY, as expected
 - unmount zram0
 - try zram0 hot remove again
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
 - fails with ENODEV (unexpected)
 - unload zram kernel module
   + completes successfully
 - zram0 device node still exists
 - attempt to mount /dev/zram0
   + mount command is killed
   + following BUG is encountered

 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at a0002ba0
 IP: get_disk+0x16/0x50
 Oops:  [#1] SMP
 CPU: 0 PID: 252 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6 #176
 Call Trace:
   exact_lock+0xc/0x20
   kobj_lookup+0xdc/0x160
   get_gendisk+0x2f/0x110
   __blkdev_get+0x10c/0x3c0
   blkdev_get+0x19d/0x2e0
   blkdev_open+0x56/0x70
   do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1ff/0x310
   vfs_open+0x43/0x60
   path_openat+0x2c9/0xf30
   do_filp_open+0x79/0xd0
   do_sys_open+0x114/0x1e0
   SyS_open+0x19/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94

This patch adds the proper error check in hot_remove_store() not to call
idr_remove() unconditionally.

Fixes: 17ec4cd98578 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010970
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-ti...@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp 
Reported-by: David Disseldorp 
Tested-by: David Disseldorp 
Acked-by: Minchan Kim 
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1403,7 +1403,8 @@ static ssize_t hot_remove_store(struct c
zram = idr_find(_index_idr, dev_id);
if (zram) {
ret = zram_remove(zram);
-   idr_remove(_index_idr, dev_id);
+   if (!ret)
+   idr_remove(_index_idr, dev_id);
} else {
ret = -ENODEV;
}

[PATCH 4.8 08/35] zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal

2016-12-06 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

--

From: Takashi Iwai 

commit 529e71e16403830ae0d737a66c55c5f360f3576b upstream.

The zram hot removal code calls idr_remove() even when zram_remove()
returns an error (typically -EBUSY).  This results in a leftover at the
device release, eventually leading to a crash when the module is
reloaded.

As described in the bug report below, the following procedure would
cause an Oops with zram:

 - provision three zram devices via modprobe zram num_devices=3
 - configure a size for each device
   + echo "1G" > /sys/block/$zram_name/disksize
 - mkfs and mount zram0 only
 - attempt to hot remove all three devices
   + echo 2 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 1 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
 - zram0 removal fails with EBUSY, as expected
 - unmount zram0
 - try zram0 hot remove again
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
 - fails with ENODEV (unexpected)
 - unload zram kernel module
   + completes successfully
 - zram0 device node still exists
 - attempt to mount /dev/zram0
   + mount command is killed
   + following BUG is encountered

 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at a0002ba0
 IP: get_disk+0x16/0x50
 Oops:  [#1] SMP
 CPU: 0 PID: 252 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6 #176
 Call Trace:
   exact_lock+0xc/0x20
   kobj_lookup+0xdc/0x160
   get_gendisk+0x2f/0x110
   __blkdev_get+0x10c/0x3c0
   blkdev_get+0x19d/0x2e0
   blkdev_open+0x56/0x70
   do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1ff/0x310
   vfs_open+0x43/0x60
   path_openat+0x2c9/0xf30
   do_filp_open+0x79/0xd0
   do_sys_open+0x114/0x1e0
   SyS_open+0x19/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94

This patch adds the proper error check in hot_remove_store() not to call
idr_remove() unconditionally.

Fixes: 17ec4cd98578 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010970
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-ti...@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp 
Reported-by: David Disseldorp 
Tested-by: David Disseldorp 
Acked-by: Minchan Kim 
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1403,7 +1403,8 @@ static ssize_t hot_remove_store(struct c
zram = idr_find(_index_idr, dev_id);
if (zram) {
ret = zram_remove(zram);
-   idr_remove(_index_idr, dev_id);
+   if (!ret)
+   idr_remove(_index_idr, dev_id);
} else {
ret = -ENODEV;
}