Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:49:49PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:34:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Build results:
> > total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
> > Failed builds: 
> > i386:tools/perf 
> > x86_64:tools/perf 
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 316 pass: 316 fail: 0
> > 
> > Culprit is commit 386ca5754fad ("perf trace: Support multiple "vfs_getname"
> > probes"), which introduces a call to strstarts() but not the necessary
> > include file or declaration. Unfortunately, fixing that is quite complex
> > (commit 8e99b6d4533c ("tools include: Adopt strstarts() from the kernel")
> > doesn't apply).
> 
> Thanks for tracking this down, I'm lost in a maze of gcc8 issues with
> perf on 4.9 and 4.4 at the moment trying to fix that.
> 
> I'll go drop this patch from the 4.9 and 4.4 queues.
> 
Agreed; the same patch also introduces a call to evlist__for_each_entry_safe(),
which does not exist in v4.4.y.

Guenter


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:34:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
>   total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
> Failed builds: 
>   i386:tools/perf 
>   x86_64:tools/perf 
> Qemu test results:
>   total: 316 pass: 316 fail: 0
> 
> Culprit is commit 386ca5754fad ("perf trace: Support multiple "vfs_getname"
> probes"), which introduces a call to strstarts() but not the necessary
> include file or declaration. Unfortunately, fixing that is quite complex
> (commit 8e99b6d4533c ("tools include: Adopt strstarts() from the kernel")
> doesn't apply).

Thanks for tracking this down, I'm lost in a maze of gcc8 issues with
perf on 4.9 and 4.4 at the moment trying to fix that.

I'll go drop this patch from the 4.9 and 4.4 queues.

thanks,

greg k-h


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
Failed builds: 
i386:tools/perf 
x86_64:tools/perf 
Qemu test results:
total: 316 pass: 316 fail: 0

Culprit is commit 386ca5754fad ("perf trace: Support multiple "vfs_getname"
probes"), which introduces a call to strstarts() but not the necessary
include file or declaration. Unfortunately, fixing that is quite complex
(commit 8e99b6d4533c ("tools include: Adopt strstarts() from the kernel")
doesn't apply).

Guenter


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Daniel Díaz
Hello!

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 11:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:14:29AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Early results:
> > >
> > > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> > > --
> > > Error log:
> > > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> > > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
> > >   PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
> > > builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
> > > builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function 
> > > ‘strstarts’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ 
> > > [-Werror=nested-externs]
> > >
> > > Also affects v4.4.y-queue.
> >
> > Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well,
> > that's not my fault :)
> >
> > I'll look at this after breakfast, thanks!
>
> I can't even get perf to build without any stable queue patches for
> 4.9.y at the moment, nor for 4.4.y, so something is odd, or I just have
> too "new" of a system.  Let me go dig up a debian box to see if I can at
> least find a way to start to reproduce this...

Interesting. To add to the fun, just yesterday I tried building the
Perf recipe from OpenEmbedded and it failed for these combinations:
* 4.4.176 and x86_64:
|   CC   
/srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work/intel_corei7_64-linaro-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o
| bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S:4:10: fatal error:
../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S: No such file or directory
|  #include "../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S"
|   ^~~
| compilation terminated.

* 4.14.105 and i386:
| In file included from util/libunwind/x86_32.c:33:0:
| util/libunwind/../../arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind.c: In function
'libunwind__x86_reg_id':
| util/libunwind/../../arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind.c:110:11: error:
'EINVAL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
'UNW_EINVAL'?
|return -EINVAL;
|^~
|UNW_EINVAL

Other combinations that worked:
* 4.4.176 with arm, arm64, i386
* 4.9.162 with arm, arm64, i386, x86_64
* 4.14.105 with arm, arm64, x86_64
* 4.19.28 with arm, arm64, i386, x86_64
* 4.20.15 with arm, arm64, i386, x86_64
* 5.0.1 with arm, arm64, i386, x86_64

I'll try again the failing combos to discard a problem with the OE build itself.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.d...@linaro.org


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:14:29AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Early results:
> > 
> > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> > --
> > Error log:
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
> >   PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
> > builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
> > builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ 
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ 
> > [-Werror=nested-externs]
> > 
> > Also affects v4.4.y-queue.
> 
> Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well,
> that's not my fault :)
> 
> I'll look at this after breakfast, thanks!

I can't even get perf to build without any stable queue patches for
4.9.y at the moment, nor for 4.4.y, so something is odd, or I just have
too "new" of a system.  Let me go dig up a debian box to see if I can at
least find a way to start to reproduce this...

greg k-h


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Jon Hunter


On 12/03/2019 17:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>   
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.163-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v4.9:
8 builds:   8 pass, 0 fail
16 boots:   16 pass, 0 fail
20 tests:   20 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:  4.9.163-rc1-g0384d1b
Boards tested:  tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:14:29AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Early results:
> > 
> > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> > --
> > Error log:
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
> >   PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
> > builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
> > builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ 
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ 
> > [-Werror=nested-externs]
> > 
> > Also affects v4.4.y-queue.
> 
> Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well,
> that's not my fault :)
> 
Actually, it turns out the build failure in 4.4.y is different:

Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
--
Error log:
  PERF_VERSION = 4.4.176.gbd5033
  builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
  builtin-trace.c:2414:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘evlist__for_each_entry_safe’; did you mean ‘hlist_for_each_entry_safe’? 

builtin-trace.c:2414:2: error: nested extern declaration of
‘evlist__for_each_entry_safe’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
builtin-trace.c:2414:50: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘{’ token
  evlist__for_each_entry_safe(evlist, evsel, tmp) {

builtin-trace.c:2406:7: error: unused variable ‘found’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
  bool found = false;
   ^
builtin-trace.c:2430:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function

so you are not entirely off the hook ...

Guenter


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Early results:
> 
> Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> --
> Error log:
> Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
>   PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
> builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
> builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ 
> [-Werror=nested-externs]
> 
> Also affects v4.4.y-queue.

Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well,
that's not my fault :)

I'll look at this after breakfast, thanks!

greg k-h


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Early results:

Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
--
Error log:
Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
  PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ 
[-Werror=nested-externs]

Also affects v4.4.y-queue.

Guenter


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-12 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 22:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.163-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
> linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Summary


kernel: 4.9.163-rc1
git repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.9.y
git commit: 605129cbbd389949c754d0a23ce49030adae8f17
git describe: v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38
Test details: 
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38

No regressions (compared to build v4.9.162)

No fixes (compared to build v4.9.162)

Ran 22654 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--
- dragonboard-410c - arm64
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- i386
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
---
* boot
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* spectre-meltdown-checker-test
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org


Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-12 Thread kernelci.org bot
stable-rc/linux-4.9.y boot: 92 boots: 1 failed, 91 passed 
(v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38)

Full Boot Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38/
Full Build Summary: 
https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.9.y/kernel/v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38/

Tree: stable-rc
Branch: linux-4.9.y
Git Describe: v4.9.162-97-g605129cbbd38
Git Commit: 605129cbbd389949c754d0a23ce49030adae8f17
Git URL: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Tested: 47 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 13 builds out of 193

Boot Regressions Detected:

arm:

qcom_defconfig:
gcc-7:
  qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600:
  lab-baylibre-seattle: new failure (last pass: 
v4.9.162-94-g0384d1b03fc9)

Boot Failure Detected:

arm:

qcom_defconfig:
gcc-7:
qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 failed lab

---
For more info write to 


[PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

2019-03-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.163-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Linux 4.9.163-rc1

Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
x86: Add TSX Force Abort CPUID/MSR

Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
perf/x86/intel: Generalize dynamic constraint creation

Peter Zijlstra (Intel) 
perf/x86/intel: Make cpuc allocations consistent

Krzysztof Kozlowski 
ARM: dts: exynos: Do not ignore real-world fuse values for thermal zone 0 
on Exynos5420

Vincent Whitchurch 
ARM: 8781/1: Fix Thumb-2 syscall return for binutils 2.29+

Ard Biesheuvel 
drm: disable uncached DMA optimization for ARM and arm64

Marek Szyprowski 
ARM: dts: exynos: Add minimal clkout parameters to Exynos3250 PMU

Marek Szyprowski 
ARM: dts: exynos: Fix pinctrl definition for eMMC RTSN line on Odroid X2/U3

Peter Zijlstra 
futex,rt_mutex: Restructure rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock()

Gustavo A. R. Silva 
scsi: aacraid: Fix missing break in switch statement

Gustavo A. R. Silva 
iscsi_ibft: Fix missing break in switch statement

Vincent Batts 
Input: elan_i2c - add id for touchpad found in Lenovo s21e-20

Jason Gerecke 
Input: wacom_serial4 - add support for Wacom ArtPad II tablet

Tetsuo Handa 
fs: ratelimit __find_get_block_slow() failure message.

Jun-Ru Chang 
MIPS: Remove function size check in get_frame_info()

Huacai Chen 
MIPS: Loongson: Introduce and use loongson_llsc_mb()

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
perf trace: Support multiple "vfs_getname" probes

Jiri Olsa 
perf symbols: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

Julian Wiedmann 
s390/qeth: fix use-after-free in error path

Martynas Pumputis 
netfilter: nf_nat: skip nat clash resolution for same-origin entries

Florian Westphal 
selftests: netfilter: add simple masq/redirect test cases

Naresh Kamboju 
selftests: netfilter: fix config fragment CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET

Andy Shevchenko 
dmaengine: dmatest: Abort test in case of mapping error

Stefano Garzarella 
vsock/virtio: reset connected sockets on device removal

Stefano Garzarella 
vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug

Codrin Ciubotariu 
dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix wrongfull report of a channel as in use

Paul Kocialkowski 
drm/sun4i: tcon: Prepare and enable TCON channel 0 clock at init

Lubomir Rintel 
irqchip/mmp: Only touch the PJ4 IRQ & FIQ bits on enable/disable

Anders Roxell 
usb: phy: fix link errors

Srinivas Kandagatla 
arm64: dts: add msm8996 compatible to gicv3

Peng Hao 
ARM: pxa: ssp: unneeded to free devm_ allocated data

Madalin Bucur 
soc: fsl: qbman: avoid race in clearing QMan interrupt

Ian Kent 
autofs: fix error return in autofs_fill_super()

Pan Bian 
autofs: drop dentry reference only when it is never used

Jan Kara 
fs/drop_caches.c: avoid softlockups in drop_pagecache_sb()

Mikhail Zaslonko 
mm, memory_hotplug: test_pages_in_a_zone do not pass the end of zone

Michal Hocko 
mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone

Qian Cai 
x86_64: increase stack size for KASAN_EXTRA

Kairui Song 
x86/kexec: Don't setup EFI info if EFI runtime is not enabled

James Morse 
arm64: kprobe: Always blacklist the KVM world-switch code

Ronnie Sahlberg 
cifs: fix computation for MAX_SMB2_HDR_SIZE

Sinan Kaya 
platform/x86: Fix unmet dependency warning for SAMSUNG_Q10

Ming Lu 
scsi: libfc: free skb when receiving invalid flogi resp

Manish Chopra 
qed: Fix VF probe failure while FLR

Yao Liu 
nfs: Fix NULL pointer dereference of dev_name

Andrew Lunn 
gpio: vf610: Mask all GPIO interrupts

Alexey Khoroshilov 
net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix error handling in rk_gmac_powerup()

Yonglong Liu 
net: hns: Fix wrong read accesses via Clause 45 MDIO protocol

Yonglong Liu 
net: hns: Fix for missing of_node_put() after of_parse_phandle()

Tomonori Sakita 
net: altera_tse: fix msgdma_tx_completion on non-zero fill_level case

Max Filippov 
xtensa: SMP: limit number of possible CPUs by NR_CPUS

Max Filippov 
xtensa: SMP: mark each possible CPU as present

Max Filippov 
xtensa: smp_lx200_defconfig: fix vectors clash

Max Filippov 
xtensa: SMP: fix secondary CPU initialization

Max Filippov 
xtensa: SMP: fix ccount_timer_shutdown

Suravee Suthikulpanit 
iommu/amd: