4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin Kelly <mke...@xevo.com>
commit 3d13de4b027d5f6276c0f9d3a264f518747d83f2 upstream.
Currently, the following causes a kernel OOPS in memcpy:
echo 1073741825 > buffer/length
echo 1 > buffer/enable
Note that using 1073741824 instead of 1073741825 causes "write error:
Cannot allocate memory" but no OOPS.
This is because 1073741824 == 2^30 and 1073741825 == 2^30+1. Since kfifo
rounds up to the nearest power of 2, it will actually call kmalloc with
roundup_pow_of_two(length) * bytes_per_datum.
Using length == 1073741825 and bytes_per_datum == 2, we get:
kmalloc(roundup_pow_of_two(1073741825) * 2
or kmalloc(2147483648 * 2)
or kmalloc(4294967296)
or kmalloc(UINT_MAX + 1)
so this overflows to 0, causing kmalloc to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR and
subsequent memcpy to fail once the device is enabled.
Fix this by checking for overflow prior to allocating a kfifo. With this
check added, the above code returns -EINVAL when enabling the buffer,
rather than causing an OOPS.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <mke...@xevo.com>
cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/kfifo_buf.c
@@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ static inline int __iio_allocate_kfifo(s
if ((length == 0) || (bytes_per_datum == 0))
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we don't overflow an unsigned int after kfifo rounds up to
+ * the next power of 2.
+ */
+ if (roundup_pow_of_two(length) > UINT_MAX / bytes_per_datum)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return __kfifo_alloc((struct __kfifo *)&buf->kf, length,
bytes_per_datum, GFP_KERNEL);
}
