5.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>

commit 7ff2c2a1a71e83f74574b8001ea88deb3c166ad7 upstream.

If 'cur_level' is 7  then the bound checking at the top of the function
will actually pass. Later on, it's possible to dereference
ds_path->nodes[cur_level+1] which will be an out of bounds.

The correct check will be cur_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 .

Fixes-coverty-id: 1440918
Fixes-coverty-id: 1440911
Fixes: ea49f3e73c4b ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce function to find all new tree 
blocks of reloc tree")
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.20+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1917,8 +1917,8 @@ static int qgroup_trace_new_subtree_bloc
        int i;
 
        /* Level sanity check */
-       if (cur_level < 0 || cur_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL ||
-           root_level < 0 || root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL ||
+       if (cur_level < 0 || cur_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 ||
+           root_level < 0 || root_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 ||
            root_level < cur_level) {
                btrfs_err_rl(fs_info,
                        "%s: bad levels, cur_level=%d root_level=%d",


Reply via email to