Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Thanks for testing! greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:50:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Thanks for testing this one! greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 841fca5a32cccd7d0123c0271f4350161ada5507 git describe: v5.10.1 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.1 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.1) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.1) Ran 56654 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * v4l2-compliance * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * perf * fwts * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Test results for stable-v5.10: > 15 builds:15 pass, 0 fail > 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail > 64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail > > Linux version:5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc > Boards tested:tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-, > tegra194-p2972-, tegra20-ventana, > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-, > tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > Test failures:tegra194-p2972-: boot.py > > > Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause > a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this > blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be > merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull > this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks > good, so ... > > Tested-by: Jon Hunter Thanks for testing this, and yes, I'll be glad to take this once it hits Linus's tree, just let me know the git commit id of it there. thanks, greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:20:38PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. > > Tested-by: Shuah Khan Thanks for testing this one and letting me know! greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
Hi Greg, On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Test results for stable-v5.10: 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail Linux version: 5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-, tegra194-p2972-, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Test failures: tegra194-p2972-: boot.py Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks good, so ... Tested-by: Jon Hunter Cheers Jon [0] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1336079/ -- nvpublic
Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan thanks, -- Shuah
[PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h - Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: Greg Kroah-Hartman Linux 5.10.1-rc1 Greg Kroah-Hartman Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10" Greg Kroah-Hartman Revert "md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned" - Diffstat: Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +--- drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
