Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. >> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. Replying here because I don't have the original. Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 65 tests: 65 pass, 0 fail Linux version: 5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-, tegra194-p2972-, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Tested-by: Jon Hunter Jon -- nvpublic
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:23:16AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 > > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Thanks for testing them all and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:52:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Thanks for testing these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2021-01-29 12:07:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > CIP testing did not find any problems here: > > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y > > Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Thanks for testing these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:01 +. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.12-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Summary kernel: 5.10.12-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 324e71045b28705e935d8136fac983c6aa808e06 git describe: v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.11-33-g324e71045b28 No regressions (compared to build v5.10.11) No fixes (compared to build v5.10.11) Ran 54244 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - arc - arm - arm64 - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - mips - nxp-ls2088 - nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size - parisc - powerpc - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan - x86_64 Test Suites --- * build * linux-log-parser * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * v4l2-compliance * kselftest * network-basic-tests * perf * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * kvm-unit-tests * fwts * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
