Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
> Linus Walleij  writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>>
>> I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> I did review, on December the 10th. I wasn't very enthusiastic about the 
> patch,
> if you check back my reply.

Sorry I missed it (mail overload as usual).

OK dropping this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Robert Jarzmik  wrote:
> Linus Walleij  writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>>
>> I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> I did review, on December the 10th. I wasn't very enthusiastic about the 
> patch,
> if you check back my reply.

Sorry I missed it (mail overload as usual).

OK dropping this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robert Jarzmik]

Linus Walleij  writes:

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  
> wrote:
>
>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>
> I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything

Hi Linus,

I did review, on December the 10th. I wasn't very enthusiastic about the patch,
if you check back my reply.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robert Jarzmik]

Linus Walleij  writes:

> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  
> wrote:
>
>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>
> I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything

Hi Linus,

I did review, on December the 10th. I wasn't very enthusiastic about the patch,
if you check back my reply.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  wrote:

> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 

I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything
with it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Arvind Yadav  wrote:

> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 

I want the maintainer Robert Jarzmik to review this before I do anything
with it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[arvind Yadav]

Yes, It will not fixes any defect. But we are going to free allocate
memory then why we need devm api. In this case Devm will first add this
entry to list and immediately  it will remove from list.

-Arvind

On Saturday 10 December 2016 02:49 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

Arvind Yadav  writes:

Hi Arvind,


In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
'functions' is live within the function only. After the
allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

That's not very true : the "need" is to spare the "manual" kfree you're adding
in your patch for one, and make it consistent with pxa2xx_build_groups() and
pxa2xx_build_state() for two.

Therefore I'm not very thrilled by this patch and unless it fixes a defect in
the driver I'd rather not have it in.

Cheers.

--
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[arvind Yadav]

Yes, It will not fixes any defect. But we are going to free allocate
memory then why we need devm api. In this case Devm will first add this
entry to list and immediately  it will remove from list.

-Arvind

On Saturday 10 December 2016 02:49 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

Arvind Yadav  writes:

Hi Arvind,


In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
'functions' is live within the function only. After the
allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

That's not very true : the "need" is to spare the "manual" kfree you're adding
in your patch for one, and make it consistent with pxa2xx_build_groups() and
pxa2xx_build_state() for two.

Therefore I'm not very thrilled by this patch and unless it fixes a defect in
the driver I'd rather not have it in.

Cheers.

--
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robert Jarzmik]

Arvind Yadav  writes:

Hi Arvind,

> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

That's not very true : the "need" is to spare the "manual" kfree you're adding
in your patch for one, and make it consistent with pxa2xx_build_groups() and
pxa2xx_build_state() for two.

Therefore I'm not very thrilled by this patch and unless it fixes a defect in
the driver I'd rather not have it in.

Cheers.

--
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robert Jarzmik]

Arvind Yadav  writes:

Hi Arvind,

> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

That's not very true : the "need" is to spare the "manual" kfree you're adding
in your patch for one, and make it consistent with pxa2xx_build_groups() and
pxa2xx_build_state() for two.

Therefore I'm not very thrilled by this patch and unless it fixes a defect in
the driver I'd rather not have it in.

Cheers.

--
Robert

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robin Murphy]

On 08/12/16 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 08/12/16 14:35, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>> ---
>>  drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
>> *pctl)
>>   * alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
>>   * of functions.
>>   */
>> -functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
>> +functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
>>   sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> AFAICS, this is allocating a mere 72 bytes. Why not just declare
> 
>   struct pxa_pinctrl_function functions[6] = {0};
> 
> locally and save *all* the bother?

Bah, ignore me, that was an incredible comprehension failure.

Sorry for the noise.

Robin.

>>  if (!functions)
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
>> *pctl)
>>  pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
>> pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> -if (!pctl->functions)
>> +if (!pctl->functions) {
>> +kfree(functions);
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>>  
>> -devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
>> +kfree(functions);
>>  return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robin Murphy]

On 08/12/16 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 08/12/16 14:35, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
>> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
>> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
>> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
>> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
>> ---
>>  drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
>> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
>> *pctl)
>>   * alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
>>   * of functions.
>>   */
>> -functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
>> +functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
>>   sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> AFAICS, this is allocating a mere 72 bytes. Why not just declare
> 
>   struct pxa_pinctrl_function functions[6] = {0};
> 
> locally and save *all* the bother?

Bah, ignore me, that was an incredible comprehension failure.

Sorry for the noise.

Robin.

>>  if (!functions)
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
>> *pctl)
>>  pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
>> pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> -if (!pctl->functions)
>> +if (!pctl->functions) {
>> +kfree(functions);
>>  return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>>  
>> -devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
>> +kfree(functions);
>>  return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robin Murphy]

On 08/12/16 14:35, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
> *pctl)
>* alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
>* of functions.
>*/
> - functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
> + functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
>sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);

AFAICS, this is allocating a mere 72 bytes. Why not just declare

struct pxa_pinctrl_function functions[6] = {0};

locally and save *all* the bother?

Robin.

>   if (!functions)
>   return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
> *pctl)
>   pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
>  pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
>  GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pctl->functions)
> + if (!pctl->functions) {
> + kfree(functions);
>   return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>  
> - devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
> + kfree(functions);
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Robin Murphy]

On 08/12/16 14:35, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
> *pctl)
>* alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
>* of functions.
>*/
> - functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
> + functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
>sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);

AFAICS, this is allocating a mere 72 bytes. Why not just declare

struct pxa_pinctrl_function functions[6] = {0};

locally and save *all* the bother?

Robin.

>   if (!functions)
>   return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
> *pctl)
>   pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
>  pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
>  GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pctl->functions)
> + if (!pctl->functions) {
> + kfree(functions);
>   return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>  
> - devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
> + kfree(functions);
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> 

[PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Arvind Yadav]

In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
'functions' is live within the function only. After the
allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl *pctl)
 * alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
 * of functions.
 */
-   functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
+   functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
 sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!functions)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
*pctl)
pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
   pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
   GFP_KERNEL);
-   if (!pctl->functions)
+   if (!pctl->functions) {
+   kfree(functions);
return -ENOMEM;
+   }
 
-   devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
+   kfree(functions);
return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

[Arvind Yadav]

In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
'functions' is live within the function only. After the
allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c | 8 +---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
index 866aa3c..47b8e3a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa2xx.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl *pctl)
 * alternate function, 6 * npins is an absolute high limit of the number
 * of functions.
 */
-   functions = devm_kcalloc(pctl->dev, pctl->npins * 6,
+   functions = kcalloc(pctl->npins * 6,
 sizeof(*functions), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!functions)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -289,10 +289,12 @@ static int pxa2xx_build_functions(struct pxa_pinctrl 
*pctl)
pctl->functions = devm_kmemdup(pctl->dev, functions,
   pctl->nfuncs * sizeof(*functions),
   GFP_KERNEL);
-   if (!pctl->functions)
+   if (!pctl->functions) {
+   kfree(functions);
return -ENOMEM;
+   }
 
-   devm_kfree(pctl->dev, functions);
+   kfree(functions);
return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4