Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'

[Martin K. Petersen]

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:59:48 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

> The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
> So use 'info' in both cases.

Applied to 5.9/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between request_irq() and free_irq()
  https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/d179f7c76324

-- 
Martin K. Petersen  Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH V2] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'

[Christophe JAILLET]

The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
So use 'info' in both cases.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
---
V2: update free_irq instead of request_irq in order not to obviously break
code
---
 drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
index 772a13e5fd91..d99ef014528e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int powertecscsi_probe(struct expansion_card *ec,
 
if (info->info.scsi.dma != NO_DMA)
free_dma(info->info.scsi.dma);
-   free_irq(ec->irq, host);
+   free_irq(ec->irq, info);
 
  out_release:
fas216_release(host);
-- 
2.25.1