Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:58:18AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > It's been applied as a fix for some time. Indeed it has. Sorry for missing that. I look forward to seeing it in a release candidate, so my system will again work on mainline :) Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:58:18AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > It's been applied as a fix for some time. Indeed it has. Sorry for missing that. I look forward to seeing it in a release candidate, so my system will again work on mainline :) Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:42:36AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: > >Hi Brian, > > Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ > >patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. > >Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? > I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most > certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper > 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule > data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. It's been applied as a fix for some time. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:42:36AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: > >Hi Brian, > > Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ > >patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. > >Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? > I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most > certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper > 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule > data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. It's been applied as a fix for some time. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
Hi Brian, I am sorry for not using the plain text mode in the previous mail. I agree with you on other points. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Brian Norriswrote: > Hi! > > (By the way, your mail is HTML and likely will get rejected by many > mailing lists and/or people reading these mailing lists.) > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: >>Hi Brian, >> Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ >>patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. > > OK cool. Obviously I'm biased, but I prefer mine, as it has less > needless whitespace, and is appropriately documented ;) But it should be > a fine replacement. > >>Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? > > I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most > certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper > 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule > data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. > > Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
Hi Brian, I am sorry for not using the plain text mode in the previous mail. I agree with you on other points. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi! > > (By the way, your mail is HTML and likely will get rejected by many > mailing lists and/or people reading these mailing lists.) > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: >>Hi Brian, >> Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ >>patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. > > OK cool. Obviously I'm biased, but I prefer mine, as it has less > needless whitespace, and is appropriately documented ;) But it should be > a fine replacement. > >>Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? > > I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most > certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper > 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule > data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. > > Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
Hi! (By the way, your mail is HTML and likely will get rejected by many mailing lists and/or people reading these mailing lists.) On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: >Hi Brian, > Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ >patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. OK cool. Obviously I'm biased, but I prefer mine, as it has less needless whitespace, and is appropriately documented ;) But it should be a fine replacement. >Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
Hi! (By the way, your mail is HTML and likely will get rejected by many mailing lists and/or people reading these mailing lists.) On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote: >Hi Brian, > Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/ >patch/10066257/ and it has been applied. OK cool. Obviously I'm biased, but I prefer mine, as it has less needless whitespace, and is appropriately documented ;) But it should be a fine replacement. >Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ? I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper 'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16. Brian
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
+ others On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > I've found that on Google's "Kevin" Chromebook, the rt5514 codec might > not be set up completely, yet its device is still present, and therefore > its PM suspend/resume is called. This hits a NULL pointer exception, > since we never had the chance to set our drvdata pointer. > > This resolves crashes seen when trying to resume my system. > > Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data > copy in resume function") > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris> --- > This is a v4.15-rc1 regression I see that this is probably a bug on its own, which should be fixed on its own (e.g., with the $subject patch), but FYI I was also pointed at this patch, which also "resolves" this problem by fixing the rt5514 DAI setup: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10067725/ [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: Use dummy_dai for rt5514 dsp dailink Would be nice to see it get handled too, possibly in 4.15 as well (I think that's a regression too?). Brian > > sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > index 2df91db765ac..9255afcf2c3a 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rt5514_resume(struct device > *dev) > if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) > disable_irq_wake(irq); > > - if (rt5514_dsp->substream) { > + if (rt5514_dsp && rt5514_dsp->substream) { > rt5514_spi_burst_read(RT5514_IRQ_CTRL, (u8 *), sizeof(buf)); > if (buf[0] & RT5514_IRQ_STATUS_BIT) > rt5514_schedule_copy(rt5514_dsp); > -- > 2.15.1.504.g5279b80103-goog >
Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
+ others On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > I've found that on Google's "Kevin" Chromebook, the rt5514 codec might > not be set up completely, yet its device is still present, and therefore > its PM suspend/resume is called. This hits a NULL pointer exception, > since we never had the chance to set our drvdata pointer. > > This resolves crashes seen when trying to resume my system. > > Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data > copy in resume function") > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris > --- > This is a v4.15-rc1 regression I see that this is probably a bug on its own, which should be fixed on its own (e.g., with the $subject patch), but FYI I was also pointed at this patch, which also "resolves" this problem by fixing the rt5514 DAI setup: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10067725/ [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: Use dummy_dai for rt5514 dsp dailink Would be nice to see it get handled too, possibly in 4.15 as well (I think that's a regression too?). Brian > > sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > index 2df91db765ac..9255afcf2c3a 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c > @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rt5514_resume(struct device > *dev) > if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) > disable_irq_wake(irq); > > - if (rt5514_dsp->substream) { > + if (rt5514_dsp && rt5514_dsp->substream) { > rt5514_spi_burst_read(RT5514_IRQ_CTRL, (u8 *), sizeof(buf)); > if (buf[0] & RT5514_IRQ_STATUS_BIT) > rt5514_schedule_copy(rt5514_dsp); > -- > 2.15.1.504.g5279b80103-goog >
[PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
I've found that on Google's "Kevin" Chromebook, the rt5514 codec might not be set up completely, yet its device is still present, and therefore its PM suspend/resume is called. This hits a NULL pointer exception, since we never had the chance to set our drvdata pointer. This resolves crashes seen when trying to resume my system. Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data copy in resume function") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris--- This is a v4.15-rc1 regression sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c index 2df91db765ac..9255afcf2c3a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rt5514_resume(struct device *dev) if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) disable_irq_wake(irq); - if (rt5514_dsp->substream) { + if (rt5514_dsp && rt5514_dsp->substream) { rt5514_spi_burst_read(RT5514_IRQ_CTRL, (u8 *), sizeof(buf)); if (buf[0] & RT5514_IRQ_STATUS_BIT) rt5514_schedule_copy(rt5514_dsp); -- 2.15.1.504.g5279b80103-goog
[PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"
I've found that on Google's "Kevin" Chromebook, the rt5514 codec might not be set up completely, yet its device is still present, and therefore its PM suspend/resume is called. This hits a NULL pointer exception, since we never had the chance to set our drvdata pointer. This resolves crashes seen when trying to resume my system. Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule data copy in resume function") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- This is a v4.15-rc1 regression sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c index 2df91db765ac..9255afcf2c3a 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5514-spi.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rt5514_resume(struct device *dev) if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) disable_irq_wake(irq); - if (rt5514_dsp->substream) { + if (rt5514_dsp && rt5514_dsp->substream) { rt5514_spi_burst_read(RT5514_IRQ_CTRL, (u8 *), sizeof(buf)); if (buf[0] & RT5514_IRQ_STATUS_BIT) rt5514_schedule_copy(rt5514_dsp); -- 2.15.1.504.g5279b80103-goog