Re: [PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-16 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
> > following patches in -mm.
> 
> What following patches?
> 

Instrumentation menu removal, which was in -mm until yesterday.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/8/81

I did this patch following a discussion with Linus about a month ago
where I was proposing the creation of the instrumentation/ directory in
the kernel sources to follow the menus/tree directories logic found in
the rest of the kernel.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/30/318

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-16 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
> following patches in -mm.

What following patches?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-16 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
 This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
 following patches in -mm.

What following patches?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-16 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
  This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
  following patches in -mm.
 
 What following patches?
 

Instrumentation menu removal, which was in -mm until yesterday.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/8/81

I did this patch following a discussion with Linus about a month ago
where I was proposing the creation of the instrumentation/ directory in
the kernel sources to follow the menus/tree directories logic found in
the rest of the kernel.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/30/318

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
The conflicting commit for 
move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
is the ARM fix from Linus :

commit 38ad9aebe70dc72df08851bbd1620d89329129ba

He just seemed to agree that my approach (just putting the missing ARM
config options in arch/arm/Kconfig) works too. The main advantage it has
is that it is smaller, does not need a cleanup in the future and does
not break the following patches unnecessarily.

It's just been discussed here

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/15/267

However, Linus might prefer to stay with his own patch and I would
totally understand it that late in the release cycle. Therefore I submit
this for the next release cycle.

This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
following patches in -mm.

It applies on top of the current 2.6.24-rc7-git8 + possibly some more
git commits (at commit 0938e7586440ac97cedc0f5528a8684ebfa4ce43).

After applying this patch,
move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
applies nicely in the -mm tree without any modification.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig |2 -
 arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation |   52 ---
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig
===
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig   2008-01-15 21:37:06.0 
-0500
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig2008-01-15 21:45:23.0 -0500
@@ -130,6 +130,23 @@ config FIQ
 config ARCH_MTD_XIP
bool
 
+if OPROFILE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARMV6
+   def_bool y
+   depends on CPU_V6 && !SMP
+   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_MPCORE
+   def_bool y
+   depends on CPU_V6 && SMP
+   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+   bool
+
+endif
+
 config VECTORS_BASE
hex
default 0x if MMU || CPU_HIGH_VECTOR
@@ -1076,7 +1093,7 @@ endmenu
 
 source "fs/Kconfig"
 
-source "arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation"
+source "kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation"
 
 source "arch/arm/Kconfig.debug"
 
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation
===
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation   2008-01-15 
21:37:06.0 -0500
+++ /dev/null   1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-menuconfig INSTRUMENTATION
-   bool "Instrumentation Support"
-   default y
-   ---help---
- Say Y here to get to see options related to performance measurement,
- system-wide debugging, and testing. This option alone does not add any
- kernel code.
-
- If you say N, all options in this submenu will be skipped and
- disabled. If you're trying to debug the kernel itself, go see the
- Kernel Hacking menu.
-
-if INSTRUMENTATION
-
-config PROFILING
-   bool "Profiling support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-   help
- Say Y here to enable the extended profiling support mechanisms used
- by profilers such as OProfile.
-
-config OPROFILE
-   tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-   depends on PROFILING && !UML
-   help
- OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
- whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
- and applications.
-
- If unsure, say N.
-
-config OPROFILE_ARMV6
-   bool
-   depends on OPROFILE && CPU_V6 && !SMP
-   default y
-   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-
-config OPROFILE_MPCORE
-   bool
-   depends on OPROFILE && CPU_V6 && SMP
-   default y
-   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-
-config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-   bool
-
-config MARKERS
-   bool "Activate markers"
-   help
- Place an empty function call at each marker site. Can be
- dynamically changed for a probe function.
-
-endif # INSTRUMENTATION

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH for -mm] Fix ARM to play nicely with generic Instrumentation menu

2008-01-15 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
The conflicting commit for 
move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
is the ARM fix from Linus :

commit 38ad9aebe70dc72df08851bbd1620d89329129ba

He just seemed to agree that my approach (just putting the missing ARM
config options in arch/arm/Kconfig) works too. The main advantage it has
is that it is smaller, does not need a cleanup in the future and does
not break the following patches unnecessarily.

It's just been discussed here

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/15/267

However, Linus might prefer to stay with his own patch and I would
totally understand it that late in the release cycle. Therefore I submit
this for the next release cycle.

This patch cleans up the fix from Linus so it does not conflict with the
following patches in -mm.

It applies on top of the current 2.6.24-rc7-git8 + possibly some more
git commits (at commit 0938e7586440ac97cedc0f5528a8684ebfa4ce43).

After applying this patch,
move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
applies nicely in the -mm tree without any modification.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig |2 -
 arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation |   52 ---
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig
===
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig   2008-01-15 21:37:06.0 
-0500
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig2008-01-15 21:45:23.0 -0500
@@ -130,6 +130,23 @@ config FIQ
 config ARCH_MTD_XIP
bool
 
+if OPROFILE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARMV6
+   def_bool y
+   depends on CPU_V6  !SMP
+   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_MPCORE
+   def_bool y
+   depends on CPU_V6  SMP
+   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+   bool
+
+endif
+
 config VECTORS_BASE
hex
default 0x if MMU || CPU_HIGH_VECTOR
@@ -1076,7 +1093,7 @@ endmenu
 
 source fs/Kconfig
 
-source arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation
+source kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
 
 source arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
 
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation
===
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation   2008-01-15 
21:37:06.0 -0500
+++ /dev/null   1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-menuconfig INSTRUMENTATION
-   bool Instrumentation Support
-   default y
-   ---help---
- Say Y here to get to see options related to performance measurement,
- system-wide debugging, and testing. This option alone does not add any
- kernel code.
-
- If you say N, all options in this submenu will be skipped and
- disabled. If you're trying to debug the kernel itself, go see the
- Kernel Hacking menu.
-
-if INSTRUMENTATION
-
-config PROFILING
-   bool Profiling support (EXPERIMENTAL)
-   help
- Say Y here to enable the extended profiling support mechanisms used
- by profilers such as OProfile.
-
-config OPROFILE
-   tristate OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)
-   depends on PROFILING  !UML
-   help
- OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
- whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
- and applications.
-
- If unsure, say N.
-
-config OPROFILE_ARMV6
-   bool
-   depends on OPROFILE  CPU_V6  !SMP
-   default y
-   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-
-config OPROFILE_MPCORE
-   bool
-   depends on OPROFILE  CPU_V6  SMP
-   default y
-   select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-
-config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
-   bool
-
-config MARKERS
-   bool Activate markers
-   help
- Place an empty function call at each marker site. Can be
- dynamically changed for a probe function.
-
-endif # INSTRUMENTATION

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/