Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: neighbour: Remove CONFIG_ARPD

2013-09-03 Thread David Miller
From: Tim Gardner 
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:38:47 -0600

> This config option is superfluous in that it only guards a call
> to neigh_app_ns(). Enabling CONFIG_ARPD by default has no
> change in behavior. There will now be call to __neigh_notify()
> for each ARP resolution, which has no impact unless there is a
> user space daemon waiting to receive the notification, i.e.,
> the case for which CONFIG_ARPD was designed anyways.
> 
> Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman 
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner 

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: neighbour: Remove CONFIG_ARPD

2013-08-29 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Tim Gardner  writes:

> This config option is superfluous in that it only guards a call
> to neigh_app_ns(). Enabling CONFIG_ARPD by default has no
> change in behavior. There will now be call to __neigh_notify()
> for each ARP resolution, which has no impact unless there is a
> user space daemon waiting to receive the notification, i.e.,
> the case for which CONFIG_ARPD was designed anyways.

This looks good to me, and much less magic to maintain.

Eric


> Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman 
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" 

> Cc: "David S. Miller" 
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov 
> Cc: James Morris 
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI 
> Cc: Patrick McHardy 
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
> Cc: Gao feng 
> Cc: Joe Perches 
> Cc: Veaceslav Falico 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner 
> ---
>
> Eric's suggestion to simply remove the config option makes sense
> to me. If acceptable then I'll submit a patch series that also removes
> CONFIG_ARPD from the various arch defconfigs.
>
>  net/core/neighbour.c |2 --
>  net/ipv4/Kconfig |   16 
>  net/ipv4/arp.c   |2 --
>  net/ipv6/ndisc.c |2 --
>  4 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 60533db..6072610 100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -2759,13 +2759,11 @@ errout:
>   rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_NEIGH, err);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
>  void neigh_app_ns(struct neighbour *n)
>  {
>   __neigh_notify(n, RTM_GETNEIGH, NLM_F_REQUEST);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(neigh_app_ns);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARPD */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>  static int zero;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
> index 37cf1a6..05c57f0 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
> @@ -259,22 +259,6 @@ config IP_PIMSM_V2
> gated-5). This routing protocol is not used widely, so say N unless
> you want to play with it.
>  
> -config ARPD
> - bool "IP: ARP daemon support"
> - ---help---
> -   The kernel maintains an internal cache which maps IP addresses to
> -   hardware addresses on the local network, so that Ethernet
> -   frames are sent to the proper address on the physical networking
> -   layer. Normally, kernel uses the ARP protocol to resolve these
> -   mappings.
> -
> -   Saying Y here adds support to have an user space daemon to do this
> -   resolution instead. This is useful for implementing an alternate
> -   address resolution protocol (e.g. NHRP on mGRE tunnels) and also for
> -   testing purposes.
> -
> -   If unsure, say N.
> -
>  config SYN_COOKIES
>   bool "IP: TCP syncookie support"
>   ---help---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> index 4429b01..7808093 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> @@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct 
> sk_buff *skb)
>   } else {
>   probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes;
>   if (probes < 0) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
>   neigh_app_ns(neigh);
> -#endif
>   return;
>   }
>   }
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> index 04d31c2..d5693ad 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> @@ -663,9 +663,7 @@ static void ndisc_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct 
> sk_buff *skb)
>   }
>   ndisc_send_ns(dev, neigh, target, target, saddr);
>   } else if ((probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes) < 0) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
>   neigh_app_ns(neigh);
> -#endif
>   } else {
>   addrconf_addr_solict_mult(target, &mcaddr);
>   ndisc_send_ns(dev, NULL, target, &mcaddr, saddr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH net-next v2] net: neighbour: Remove CONFIG_ARPD

2013-08-29 Thread Tim Gardner
This config option is superfluous in that it only guards a call
to neigh_app_ns(). Enabling CONFIG_ARPD by default has no
change in behavior. There will now be call to __neigh_notify()
for each ARP resolution, which has no impact unless there is a
user space daemon waiting to receive the notification, i.e.,
the case for which CONFIG_ARPD was designed anyways.

Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov 
Cc: James Morris 
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI 
Cc: Patrick McHardy 
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" 
Cc: Gao feng 
Cc: Joe Perches 
Cc: Veaceslav Falico 
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner 
---

Eric's suggestion to simply remove the config option makes sense
to me. If acceptable then I'll submit a patch series that also removes
CONFIG_ARPD from the various arch defconfigs.

 net/core/neighbour.c |2 --
 net/ipv4/Kconfig |   16 
 net/ipv4/arp.c   |2 --
 net/ipv6/ndisc.c |2 --
 4 files changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 60533db..6072610 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -2759,13 +2759,11 @@ errout:
rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_NEIGH, err);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
 void neigh_app_ns(struct neighbour *n)
 {
__neigh_notify(n, RTM_GETNEIGH, NLM_F_REQUEST);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(neigh_app_ns);
-#endif /* CONFIG_ARPD */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 static int zero;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
index 37cf1a6..05c57f0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig
+++ b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
@@ -259,22 +259,6 @@ config IP_PIMSM_V2
  gated-5). This routing protocol is not used widely, so say N unless
  you want to play with it.
 
-config ARPD
-   bool "IP: ARP daemon support"
-   ---help---
- The kernel maintains an internal cache which maps IP addresses to
- hardware addresses on the local network, so that Ethernet
- frames are sent to the proper address on the physical networking
- layer. Normally, kernel uses the ARP protocol to resolve these
- mappings.
-
- Saying Y here adds support to have an user space daemon to do this
- resolution instead. This is useful for implementing an alternate
- address resolution protocol (e.g. NHRP on mGRE tunnels) and also for
- testing purposes.
-
- If unsure, say N.
-
 config SYN_COOKIES
bool "IP: TCP syncookie support"
---help---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
index 4429b01..7808093 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
@@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
} else {
probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes;
if (probes < 0) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
neigh_app_ns(neigh);
-#endif
return;
}
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
index 04d31c2..d5693ad 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -663,9 +663,7 @@ static void ndisc_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
}
ndisc_send_ns(dev, neigh, target, target, saddr);
} else if ((probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes) < 0) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
neigh_app_ns(neigh);
-#endif
} else {
addrconf_addr_solict_mult(target, &mcaddr);
ndisc_send_ns(dev, NULL, target, &mcaddr, saddr);
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/