Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE
Hi Horatiu, On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 14:34, Horatiu Vultur wrote: > > The 06/23/2020 14:38, David Miller wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > > content is safe > > > > From: Horatiu Vultur > > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200 > > > > > This patch series does the following: > > > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2) > > > because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the > > > interconnect port role as value 0x2. > > > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and > > > secondary(0x1). > > > > > > v2: > > > - add the validation code when setting the port role. > > > > Series applied, thank you. > > Thanks. Will these patches be applied also on net-next? > Because if I start now to add support for the interconnect port, these > patches are needed on net-next. Or do I need to add these patches to the > patch series for the interconnect port? > What is the correct way of doing this? > > -- > /Horatiu The "net" tree is merged weekly (or so) by David into "net-next". So, your patches should be available at the beginning of the next week. Cheers, -Vladimir
Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE
The 06/23/2020 14:38, David Miller wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > From: Horatiu Vultur > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200 > > > This patch series does the following: > > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2) > > because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the > > interconnect port role as value 0x2. > > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and > > secondary(0x1). > > > > v2: > > - add the validation code when setting the port role. > > Series applied, thank you. Thanks. Will these patches be applied also on net-next? Because if I start now to add support for the interconnect port, these patches are needed on net-next. Or do I need to add these patches to the patch series for the interconnect port? What is the correct way of doing this? -- /Horatiu
Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE
From: Horatiu Vultur Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200 > This patch series does the following: > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2) > because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the > interconnect port role as value 0x2. > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and > secondary(0x1). > > v2: > - add the validation code when setting the port role. Series applied, thank you.
[PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE
This patch series does the following: - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2) because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the interconnect port role as value 0x2. - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and secondary(0x1). v2: - add the validation code when setting the port role. Horatiu Vultur (2): bridge: uapi: mrp: Fix MRP_PORT_ROLE bridge: mrp: Validate when setting the port role include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h | 1 - net/bridge/br_mrp.c | 10 -- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.26.2
