Re: [PATCH net v3] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init

2020-11-27 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:09:19PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>   Hello,
> 
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Wang Hai wrote:
> 
> > kmemleak report a memory leak as follows:
> > 
> > BUG: memory leak
> > unreferenced object 0x8880759ea000 (size 256):
> > backtrace:
> > [] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline]
> > [] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421
> > [<9d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535
> > [<97bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126
> > [<652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169
> > [<4c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429
> > [] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151
> > [<153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341
> > [] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482
> > [] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110
> > [<098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179
> > [<26ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072
> > [] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428
> > [<2974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703
> > [<62ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
> > [<93f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > 
> > In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs
> > to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak
> > will occur.
> > 
> > Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL
> > when PROC is not used.
> > 
> > Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs")
> > Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.")
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot 
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai 
> 
>   Looks good to me, thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov 

Applied, thanks.


Re: [PATCH net v3] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init

2020-11-24 Thread Julian Anastasov


Hello,

On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Wang Hai wrote:

> kmemleak report a memory leak as follows:
> 
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0x8880759ea000 (size 256):
> backtrace:
> [] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline]
> [] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421
> [<9d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535
> [<97bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126
> [<652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169
> [<4c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429
> [] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151
> [<153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341
> [] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482
> [] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110
> [<098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179
> [<26ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072
> [] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428
> [<2974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703
> [<62ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
> [<93f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs
> to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak
> will occur.
> 
> Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL
> when PROC is not used.
> 
> Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs")
> Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai 

Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Julian Anastasov 

> ---
> v2->v3: improve code format
> v1->v2: add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' and check the return value of 
> proc_create_net*
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 31 +--
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index e279ded4e306..d45dbcba8b49 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -4167,12 +4167,18 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct 
> netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>  
>   spin_lock_init(>tot_stats.lock);
>  
> - proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, _vs_info_seq_ops,
> - sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter));
> - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
> - ip_vs_stats_show, NULL);
> - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
> - ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> + if (!proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
> +  _vs_info_seq_ops, sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter)))
> + goto err_vs;
> + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
> + ip_vs_stats_show, NULL))
> + goto err_stats;
> + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0,
> + ipvs->net->proc_net,
> + ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL))
> + goto err_percpu;
> +#endif
>  
>   if (ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(ipvs))
>   goto err;
> @@ -4180,6 +4186,17 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct 
> netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>   return 0;
>  
>  err:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net);
> +
> +err_percpu:
> + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net);
> +
> +err_stats:
> + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net);
> +
> +err_vs:
> +#endif
>   free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats);
>   return -ENOMEM;
>  }
> @@ -4188,9 +4205,11 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct 
> netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>  {
>   ip_vs_trash_cleanup(ipvs);
>   ip_vs_control_net_cleanup_sysctl(ipvs);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net);
>   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net);
>   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net);
> +#endif
>   free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov 



[PATCH net v3] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init

2020-11-24 Thread Wang Hai
kmemleak report a memory leak as follows:

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0x8880759ea000 (size 256):
backtrace:
[] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline]
[] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421
[<9d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535
[<97bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126
[<652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169
[<4c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429
[] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151
[<153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341
[] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482
[] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110
[<098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179
[<26ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072
[] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428
[<2974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703
[<62ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
[<93f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs
to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak
will occur.

Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL
when PROC is not used.

Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs")
Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot 
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai 
---
v2->v3: improve code format
v1->v2: add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' and check the return value of 
proc_create_net*
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 31 +--
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
index e279ded4e306..d45dbcba8b49 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
@@ -4167,12 +4167,18 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs 
*ipvs)
 
spin_lock_init(>tot_stats.lock);
 
-   proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, _vs_info_seq_ops,
-   sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter));
-   proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
-   ip_vs_stats_show, NULL);
-   proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
-   ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+   if (!proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
+_vs_info_seq_ops, sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter)))
+   goto err_vs;
+   if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net,
+   ip_vs_stats_show, NULL))
+   goto err_stats;
+   if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0,
+   ipvs->net->proc_net,
+   ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL))
+   goto err_percpu;
+#endif
 
if (ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(ipvs))
goto err;
@@ -4180,6 +4186,17 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs 
*ipvs)
return 0;
 
 err:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net);
+
+err_percpu:
+   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net);
+
+err_stats:
+   remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net);
+
+err_vs:
+#endif
free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats);
return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -4188,9 +4205,11 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct 
netns_ipvs *ipvs)
 {
ip_vs_trash_cleanup(ipvs);
ip_vs_control_net_cleanup_sysctl(ipvs);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net);
remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net);
remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net);
+#endif
free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1