[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Repurpose no-CBs event tracing to future-GP events
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
Dyntick-idle CPUs need to be able to pre-announce their need for grace
periods. This can be done using something similar to the mechanism used
by no-CB CPUs to announce their need for grace periods. This commit
moves in this direction by renaming the no-CBs grace-period event tracing
to suit the new future-grace-period needs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney
---
include/trace/events/rcu.h | 16 +-
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h| 62 ++-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index cdfed6d..59ebcc8 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
);
/*
- * Tracepoint for no-callbacks grace-period events. The caller should
- * pull the data from the rcu_node structure, other than rcuname, which
- * comes from the rcu_state structure, and event, which is one of the
- * following:
+ * Tracepoint for future grace-period events, including those for no-callbacks
+ * CPUs. The caller should pull the data from the rcu_node structure,
+ * other than rcuname, which comes from the rcu_state structure, and event,
+ * which is one of the following:
*
* "Startleaf": Request a nocb grace period based on leaf-node data.
* "Startedleaf": Leaf-node start proved sufficient.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
* "Cleanup": Clean up rcu_node structure after previous GP.
* "CleanupMore": Clean up, and another no-CB GP is needed.
*/
-TRACE_EVENT(rcu_nocb_grace_period,
+TRACE_EVENT(rcu_future_grace_period,
TP_PROTO(char *rcuname, unsigned long gpnum, unsigned long completed,
unsigned long c, u8 level, int grplo, int grphi,
@@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_barrier,
#define trace_rcu_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, gpevent) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rcuname, gpnum, level, grplo, grphi, \
qsmask) do { } while (0)
-#define trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \
- level, grplo, grphi, event) \
- do { } while (0)
+#define trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \
+ level, grplo, grphi, event) \
+ do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_preempt_task(rcuname, pid, gpnum) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(rcuname, gpnum, pid) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(rcuname, gpnum, mask, qsmask, level, \
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index d55475b..bcd8268 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2080,9 +2080,9 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_node *rnp)
wake_up_all(>nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1]);
rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1] = 0;
needmore = rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(c + 1) & 0x1];
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
- c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
return needmore;
}
@@ -2229,9 +2229,9 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Count our request for a grace period. */
rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
- c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- "Startleaf");
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
+ rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "Startleaf");
if (rnp->gpnum != rnp->completed) {
@@ -2240,10 +2240,10 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
* is in progress, so we are done. When this grace
* period ends, our request will be acted upon.
*/
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
- rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c,
- rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
- "Startedleaf");
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
+ rnp->completed, c, rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Repurpose no-CBs event tracing to future-GP events
From: Paul E. McKenney paul.mcken...@linaro.org
Dyntick-idle CPUs need to be able to pre-announce their need for grace
periods. This can be done using something similar to the mechanism used
by no-CB CPUs to announce their need for grace periods. This commit
moves in this direction by renaming the no-CBs grace-period event tracing
to suit the new future-grace-period needs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul.mcken...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
include/trace/events/rcu.h | 16 +-
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h| 62 ++-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index cdfed6d..59ebcc8 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
);
/*
- * Tracepoint for no-callbacks grace-period events. The caller should
- * pull the data from the rcu_node structure, other than rcuname, which
- * comes from the rcu_state structure, and event, which is one of the
- * following:
+ * Tracepoint for future grace-period events, including those for no-callbacks
+ * CPUs. The caller should pull the data from the rcu_node structure,
+ * other than rcuname, which comes from the rcu_state structure, and event,
+ * which is one of the following:
*
* Startleaf: Request a nocb grace period based on leaf-node data.
* Startedleaf: Leaf-node start proved sufficient.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
* Cleanup: Clean up rcu_node structure after previous GP.
* CleanupMore: Clean up, and another no-CB GP is needed.
*/
-TRACE_EVENT(rcu_nocb_grace_period,
+TRACE_EVENT(rcu_future_grace_period,
TP_PROTO(char *rcuname, unsigned long gpnum, unsigned long completed,
unsigned long c, u8 level, int grplo, int grphi,
@@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_barrier,
#define trace_rcu_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, gpevent) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rcuname, gpnum, level, grplo, grphi, \
qsmask) do { } while (0)
-#define trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \
- level, grplo, grphi, event) \
- do { } while (0)
+#define trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \
+ level, grplo, grphi, event) \
+ do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_preempt_task(rcuname, pid, gpnum) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(rcuname, gpnum, pid) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(rcuname, gpnum, mask, qsmask, level, \
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index d55475b..bcd8268 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2080,9 +2080,9 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_node *rnp)
wake_up_all(rnp-nocb_gp_wq[c 0x1]);
rnp-n_nocb_gp_requests[c 0x1] = 0;
needmore = rnp-n_nocb_gp_requests[(c + 1) 0x1];
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rsp-name, rnp-gpnum, rnp-completed,
- c, rnp-level, rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi,
- needmore ? CleanupMore : Cleanup);
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rsp-name, rnp-gpnum, rnp-completed,
+ c, rnp-level, rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi,
+ needmore ? CleanupMore : Cleanup);
return needmore;
}
@@ -2229,9 +2229,9 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Count our request for a grace period. */
rnp-n_nocb_gp_requests[c 0x1]++;
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp-rsp-name, rnp-gpnum, rnp-completed,
- c, rnp-level, rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi,
- Startleaf);
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp-rsp-name, rnp-gpnum,
+ rnp-completed, c, rnp-level,
+ rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi, Startleaf);
if (rnp-gpnum != rnp-completed) {
@@ -2240,10 +2240,10 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
* is in progress, so we are done. When this grace
* period ends, our request will be acted upon.
*/
- trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp-rsp-name,
- rnp-gpnum, rnp-completed, c,
- rnp-level, rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi,
- Startedleaf);
+ trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp-rsp-name, rnp-gpnum,
+ rnp-completed, c, rnp-level,
+ rnp-grplo, rnp-grphi,
+
