Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
On 1/04/21 4:40 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
> On 3/31/2021 11:19 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
>>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
>>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
>>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
>>> during its runtime-suspend.
>>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
>>> comes out of it.
>>> The commit
>>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
>>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
>>>
>>> Call trace:
>>> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
>>> __schedule+0x478/0x764
>>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0
>>> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
>>> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
>>> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
>>> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
>>> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
>>> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
>>> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
>>> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
>>> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
>>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
>>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
>>> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
>>> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
>>> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
>>> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
>>> kthread+0x13c/0x320
>>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>>
>>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
>>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
>>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
>>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
>>> hba resumes.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo
>>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo
>>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
>>> ---
>>
> Hi Adrian
> Thanks for the comments.
>> Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree.
>>
> Umm, it's based on the below:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git
> Branch: refs/heads/for-next
>
> The top most change is e27f3c8 on 27th March'21.
> Which tree are you referring to that'd be latest?
Dunno, but that seems to be missing:
commit aa53f580e67b49ec5f4d9bd1de81eb9eb0dc079f
Author: Can Guo
Date: Tue Feb 23 21:36:47 2021 -0800
scsi: ufs: Minor adjustments to error handling
which is in v5.12-rc3
>
>> Also came across the issue below:
>>
>>
>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev);
>>
>> This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already
>> quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed isOk. I'll fix it in the next
>> version.
>
>>
>> __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
>>
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>
>
Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
On 3/31/2021 11:19 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
during its runtime-suspend.
During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
comes out of it.
The commit
(d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
Call trace:
__switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
__schedule+0x478/0x764
schedule+0x9c/0xe0
blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
__scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
__rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
kthread+0x13c/0x320
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
hba resumes.
Co-developed-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
---
Hi Adrian
Thanks for the comments.
Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree.
Umm, it's based on the below:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git
Branch: refs/heads/for-next
The top most change is e27f3c8 on 27th March'21.
Which tree are you referring to that'd be latest?
Also came across the issue below:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev)
+{
+ ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev);
This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already
quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed isOk. I'll fix it in the next version.
__ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
> during its runtime-suspend.
> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
> comes out of it.
> The commit
> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
>
> Call trace:
> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
> __schedule+0x478/0x764
> schedule+0x9c/0xe0
> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
> kthread+0x13c/0x320
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
> hba resumes.
>
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
> ---
Looks good but still doesn't seem to based on the latest tree.
Also came across the issue below:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int ufshcd_wl_poweroff(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + ufshcd_wl_shutdown(dev);
This turned out to be wrong. This is a PM op and SCSI has already
quiesced the sdev's. All that is needed is:
__ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
[PATCH v14 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
during its runtime-suspend.
During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
comes out of it.
The commit
(d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
Call trace:
__switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
__schedule+0x478/0x764
schedule+0x9c/0xe0
blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
__scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
__rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
kthread+0x13c/0x320
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
hba resumes.
Co-developed-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c | 2 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c | 2 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c | 6 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 2 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-hisi.c| 2 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c| 12 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c| 2 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c | 6 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pci.c | 36 +--
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 636 ++---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 +
include/trace/events/ufs.h | 20 ++
13 files changed, 504 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c
index 13d9204..b9105e4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c
@@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops cdns_ufs_dev_pm_ops = {
.runtime_suspend = ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend,
.runtime_resume = ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_resume,
.runtime_idle= ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_idle,
+ .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare,
+ .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete,
};
static struct platform_driver cdns_ufs_pltfrm_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c
b/drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c
index 67a6a61..b01db12 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops tc_dwc_g210_pci_pm_ops = {
.runtime_suspend = tc_dwc_g210_pci_runtime_suspend,
.runtime_resume = tc_dwc_g210_pci_runtime_resume,
.runtime_idle= tc_dwc_g210_pci_runtime_idle,
+ .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare,
+ .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete,
};
static const struct pci_device_id tc_dwc_g210_pci_tbl[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c
index ced9ef4..1e8d92b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ void __init ufs_debugfs_init(void)
ufs_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("ufshcd", NULL);
}
-void __exit ufs_debugfs_exit(void)
+void ufs_debugfs_exit(void)
{
debugfs_remove_recursive(ufs_debugfs_root);
}
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ __acquires(&hba->host_sem)
up(&hba->host_sem);
return -EBUSY;
}
- pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
+ scsi_autopm_get_device(hba->sdev_ufs_device);
return 0;
}
static void ufs_debugfs_put_user_access(struct ufs_hba *hba)
__releases(&hba->host_sem)
{
- pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
+ scsi_autopm_put_device(hba->sdev_ufs_device);
up(&hba->host_sem);
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h
index 3ca29d3..97548a3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct ufs_hba;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
void __init ufs_debugfs_init(void);
-void __exit ufs_debugfs_exit(void);
+void ufs_debugfs_exit(void);
void ufs_debugfs_hba_init(struct ufs_hba *hba);
void ufs_debugfs_hba_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
void ufs_debugfs_exception_event(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 status);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
index 70647ea..49a918c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
@@ -1267,6 +1267,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos_ufs_pm_ops = {
.runtime_suspend = ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend,
.r
