Re: [PATCH v2] vTPM: fix missing error handling for suspend operation

2016-03-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:41:23AM -0400, Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo wrote:
> ibmvtpm_send_crq in tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend returns errors in a more
> granular level than what the existing code does.  This patch adds
> the missing CRQ transport event code checks to ensure appropriate
> action taken, in the case that ibmvtpm_send_crq returns H_CLOSED.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo 
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c |   43 ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |7 ++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)



This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.




Re: [PATCH v2] vTPM: fix missing error handling for suspend operation

2016-03-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:41:23AM -0400, Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo wrote:
> ibmvtpm_send_crq in tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend returns errors in a more
> granular level than what the existing code does.  This patch adds
> the missing CRQ transport event code checks to ensure appropriate
> action taken, in the case that ibmvtpm_send_crq returns H_CLOSED.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo 
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c |   43 ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |7 ++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)



This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.




[PATCH v2] vTPM: fix missing error handling for suspend operation

2016-03-31 Thread Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo
ibmvtpm_send_crq in tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend returns errors in a more
granular level than what the existing code does.  This patch adds
the missing CRQ transport event code checks to ensure appropriate
action taken, in the case that ibmvtpm_send_crq returns H_CLOSED.

Signed-off-by: Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo 
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c |   43 ---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |7 ++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 3e6a226..ea2a970 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -335,17 +335,46 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
u64 *buf = (u64 *) 
int rc = 0;
+   int counter = 0;
+   int sig;
 
-   crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-   crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
+suspend:
+   crq_initialized = 0;
+   crq.valid = (u8) IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
+   crq.msg = (u8) VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
 
rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
  cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
+
+   if ((rc == H_CLOSED) && (crq.valid == (u8) VALID_TRANSPORT_EVENT)) {
+   if (crq.msg == (u8) PARTNER_PARTITION_FAILED) {
+   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
+   "vtpm has terminated fatally; reboot to 
reinstate a trusted state.\n");
+   }
+
+   if ((crq.msg == (u8) PARTNER_PARTITION_DEREG_CRQ)
+   && (counter < 1)) {
+   counter++;
+
+   /* The vtpm is in the process of being reloaded by
+* firmware and has de-registered CRQ.  The client
+* must wait for the CRQ INITIALIZATION message and
+* respond and must resubmit suspend message.
+*/
+   sig =
+   wait_event_interruptible(ibmvtpm->wq,
+crq_initialized == 1);
+   if (sig)
+   return -EINTR;
+   goto suspend;
+   }
+   }
+
if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
-   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-   "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
 
return rc;
+
 }
 
 /**
@@ -477,6 +506,9 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
case INIT_CRQ_COMP_RES:
dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
 "CRQ initialization completed\n");
+   /* in case vtpm is being reloaded */
+   crq_initialized = 1;
+   wake_up_interruptible(>wq);
return;
default:
dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Unknown crq message type: %d\n", 
crq->msg);
@@ -517,6 +549,9 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
ibmvtpm->res_len = be16_to_cpu(crq->len);
wake_up_interruptible(>wq);
return;
+   case VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND_RES:
+   dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev, "Prepare to Suspend Response\n");
+   return;
default:
return;
}
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 6af9289..ed5fd5f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -73,4 +73,11 @@ struct ibmvtpm_dev {
 #define VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND0x04
 #define VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND_RES(0x04 | VTPM_MSG_RES)
 
+/* vTPM CRQ Transport Event codes */
+#define VALID_TRANSPORT_EVENT  0xFF
+#define PARTNER_PARTITION_FAILED   0x01
+#define PARTNER_PARTITION_DEREG_CRQ0x02
+
+int crq_initialized;
+
 #endif
-- 
1.7.1



[PATCH v2] vTPM: fix missing error handling for suspend operation

2016-03-31 Thread Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo
ibmvtpm_send_crq in tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend returns errors in a more
granular level than what the existing code does.  This patch adds
the missing CRQ transport event code checks to ensure appropriate
action taken, in the case that ibmvtpm_send_crq returns H_CLOSED.

Signed-off-by: Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo 
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c |   43 ---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |7 ++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 3e6a226..ea2a970 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -335,17 +335,46 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
u64 *buf = (u64 *) 
int rc = 0;
+   int counter = 0;
+   int sig;
 
-   crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-   crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
+suspend:
+   crq_initialized = 0;
+   crq.valid = (u8) IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
+   crq.msg = (u8) VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
 
rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
  cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
+
+   if ((rc == H_CLOSED) && (crq.valid == (u8) VALID_TRANSPORT_EVENT)) {
+   if (crq.msg == (u8) PARTNER_PARTITION_FAILED) {
+   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
+   "vtpm has terminated fatally; reboot to 
reinstate a trusted state.\n");
+   }
+
+   if ((crq.msg == (u8) PARTNER_PARTITION_DEREG_CRQ)
+   && (counter < 1)) {
+   counter++;
+
+   /* The vtpm is in the process of being reloaded by
+* firmware and has de-registered CRQ.  The client
+* must wait for the CRQ INITIALIZATION message and
+* respond and must resubmit suspend message.
+*/
+   sig =
+   wait_event_interruptible(ibmvtpm->wq,
+crq_initialized == 1);
+   if (sig)
+   return -EINTR;
+   goto suspend;
+   }
+   }
+
if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
-   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-   "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+   dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
 
return rc;
+
 }
 
 /**
@@ -477,6 +506,9 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
case INIT_CRQ_COMP_RES:
dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
 "CRQ initialization completed\n");
+   /* in case vtpm is being reloaded */
+   crq_initialized = 1;
+   wake_up_interruptible(>wq);
return;
default:
dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Unknown crq message type: %d\n", 
crq->msg);
@@ -517,6 +549,9 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
ibmvtpm->res_len = be16_to_cpu(crq->len);
wake_up_interruptible(>wq);
return;
+   case VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND_RES:
+   dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev, "Prepare to Suspend Response\n");
+   return;
default:
return;
}
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 6af9289..ed5fd5f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -73,4 +73,11 @@ struct ibmvtpm_dev {
 #define VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND0x04
 #define VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND_RES(0x04 | VTPM_MSG_RES)
 
+/* vTPM CRQ Transport Event codes */
+#define VALID_TRANSPORT_EVENT  0xFF
+#define PARTNER_PARTITION_FAILED   0x01
+#define PARTNER_PARTITION_DEREG_CRQ0x02
+
+int crq_initialized;
+
 #endif
-- 
1.7.1