Re: [PATCH v2] writeback: use exact memcg dirty counts
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:20:44 -0400 Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> > @@ -3907,10 +3923,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> > unsigned long *pfilepages,
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(wb->memcg_css);
> > struct mem_cgroup *parent;
> >
> > - *pdirty = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> > + *pdirty = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> >
> > /* this should eventually include NR_UNSTABLE_NFS */
> > - *pwriteback = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_WRITEBACK);
> > + *pwriteback = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_WRITEBACK);
> > *pfilepages = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, (1 << LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) |
> > (1 << LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
>
> Andrew,
>
> just a head-up: -mm has that LRU stat cleanup series queued ("mm:
> memcontrol: clean up the LRU counts tracking") that changes the
> mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages() call here to two memcg_page_state().
>
> I'm assuming Greg's fix here will get merged before the cleanup. When
> it gets picked up, it'll conflict with "mm: memcontrol: push down
> mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages()".
>
> "mm: memcontrol: push down mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages()" will need to be
> changed to use memcg_exact_page_state() calls instead of the plain
> memcg_page_state() for *pfilepages.
>
Thanks. Like this?
void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long *pfilepages,
unsigned long *pheadroom, unsigned long *pdirty,
unsigned long *pwriteback)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(wb->memcg_css);
struct mem_cgroup *parent;
*pdirty = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
/* this should eventually include NR_UNSTABLE_NFS */
*pwriteback = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_WRITEBACK);
*pfilepages = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
*pheadroom = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX;
while ((parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))) {
unsigned long ceiling = min(memcg->memory.max, memcg->high);
unsigned long used = page_counter_read(&memcg->memory);
*pheadroom = min(*pheadroom, ceiling - min(ceiling, used));
memcg = parent;
}
}
Re: [PATCH v2] writeback: use exact memcg dirty counts
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> @@ -3907,10 +3923,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> unsigned long *pfilepages,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(wb->memcg_css);
> struct mem_cgroup *parent;
>
> - *pdirty = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> + *pdirty = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
>
> /* this should eventually include NR_UNSTABLE_NFS */
> - *pwriteback = memcg_page_state(memcg, NR_WRITEBACK);
> + *pwriteback = memcg_exact_page_state(memcg, NR_WRITEBACK);
> *pfilepages = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, (1 << LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) |
>(1 << LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
Andrew,
just a head-up: -mm has that LRU stat cleanup series queued ("mm:
memcontrol: clean up the LRU counts tracking") that changes the
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages() call here to two memcg_page_state().
I'm assuming Greg's fix here will get merged before the cleanup. When
it gets picked up, it'll conflict with "mm: memcontrol: push down
mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages()".
"mm: memcontrol: push down mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages()" will need to be
changed to use memcg_exact_page_state() calls instead of the plain
memcg_page_state() for *pfilepages.
Thanks
Re: [PATCH v2] writeback: use exact memcg dirty counts
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Since commit a983b5ebee57 ("mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in
> memory.stat reporting") memcg dirty and writeback counters are managed
> as:
> 1) per-memcg per-cpu values in range of [-32..32]
> 2) per-memcg atomic counter
> When a per-cpu counter cannot fit in [-32..32] it's flushed to the
> atomic. Stat readers only check the atomic.
> Thus readers such as balance_dirty_pages() may see a nontrivial error
> margin: 32 pages per cpu.
> Assuming 100 cpus:
>4k x86 page_size: 13 MiB error per memcg
> 64k ppc page_size: 200 MiB error per memcg
> Considering that dirty+writeback are used together for some decisions
> the errors double.
>
> This inaccuracy can lead to undeserved oom kills. One nasty case is
> when all per-cpu counters hold positive values offsetting an atomic
> negative value (i.e. per_cpu[*]=32, atomic=n_cpu*-32).
> balance_dirty_pages() only consults the atomic and does not consider
> throttling the next n_cpu*32 dirty pages. If the file_lru is in the
> 13..200 MiB range then there's absolutely no dirty throttling, which
> burdens vmscan with only dirty+writeback pages thus resorting to oom
> kill.
>
> It could be argued that tiny containers are not supported, but it's more
> subtle. It's the amount the space available for file lru that matters.
> If a container has memory.max-200MiB of non reclaimable memory, then it
> will also suffer such oom kills on a 100 cpu machine.
>
> The following test reliably ooms without this patch. This patch avoids
> oom kills.
>
> $ cat test
> mount -t cgroup2 none /dev/cgroup
> cd /dev/cgroup
> echo +io +memory > cgroup.subtree_control
> mkdir test
> cd test
> echo 10M > memory.max
> (echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec /memcg-writeback-stress /foo)
> (echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec dd if=/dev/zero of=/foo bs=2M
> count=100)
>
> $ cat memcg-writeback-stress.c
> /*
>* Dirty pages from all but one cpu.
>* Clean pages from the non dirtying cpu.
>* This is to stress per cpu counter imbalance.
>* On a 100 cpu machine:
>* - per memcg per cpu dirty count is 32 pages for each of 99 cpus
>* - per memcg atomic is -99*32 pages
>* - thus the complete dirty limit: sum of all counters 0
>* - balance_dirty_pages() only sees atomic count -99*32 pages, which
>* it max()s to 0.
>* - So a workload can dirty -99*32 pages before balance_dirty_pages()
>* cares.
>*/
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> static char *buf;
> static int bufSize;
>
> static void set_affinity(int cpu)
> {
> cpu_set_t affinity;
>
> CPU_ZERO(&affinity);
> CPU_SET(cpu, &affinity);
> if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(affinity), &affinity))
> err(1, "sched_setaffinity");
> }
>
> static void dirty_on(int output_fd, int cpu)
> {
> int i, wrote;
>
> set_affinity(cpu);
> for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> for (wrote = 0; wrote < bufSize; ) {
> int ret = write(output_fd, buf+wrote, bufSize-wrote);
> if (ret == -1)
> err(1, "write");
> wrote += ret;
> }
> }
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int cpu, flush_cpu = 1, output_fd;
> const char *output;
>
> if (argc != 2)
> errx(1, "usage: output_file");
>
> output = argv[1];
> bufSize = getpagesize();
> buf = malloc(getpagesize());
> if (buf == NULL)
> errx(1, "malloc failed");
>
> output_fd = open(output, O_CREAT|O_RDWR);
> if (output_fd == -1)
> err(1, "open(%s)", output);
>
> for (cpu = 0; cpu < get_nprocs(); cpu++) {
> if (cpu != flush_cpu)
> dirty_on(output_fd, cpu);
> }
>
> set_affinity(flush_cpu);
> if (fsync(output_fd))
> err(1, "fsync(%s)", output);
> if (close(output_fd))
> err(1, "close(%s)", output);
> free(buf);
> }
>
> Make balance_dirty_pages() and wb_over_bg_thresh() work harder to
> collect exact per memcg counters. This avoids the aforementioned oom
> kills.
>
> This does not affect the overhead of memory.stat, which still reads the
> single atomic counter.
>
> Why not use percpu_counter? memcg already handles cpus going offline,
> so no need for that overhead from percpu_counter. And the
> percpu_counter spinlocks are more heavyweight than is required.
>
> It probably also makes sense to use exact dirty and writeback counters
> in memcg oom reports. But that is saved for later.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
Thanks Greg!
Re: [PATCH v2] writeback: use exact memcg dirty counts
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Since commit a983b5ebee57 ("mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in
> memory.stat reporting") memcg dirty and writeback counters are managed
> as:
> 1) per-memcg per-cpu values in range of [-32..32]
> 2) per-memcg atomic counter
> When a per-cpu counter cannot fit in [-32..32] it's flushed to the
> atomic. Stat readers only check the atomic.
> Thus readers such as balance_dirty_pages() may see a nontrivial error
> margin: 32 pages per cpu.
> Assuming 100 cpus:
>4k x86 page_size: 13 MiB error per memcg
> 64k ppc page_size: 200 MiB error per memcg
> Considering that dirty+writeback are used together for some decisions
> the errors double.
>
> This inaccuracy can lead to undeserved oom kills. One nasty case is
> when all per-cpu counters hold positive values offsetting an atomic
> negative value (i.e. per_cpu[*]=32, atomic=n_cpu*-32).
> balance_dirty_pages() only consults the atomic and does not consider
> throttling the next n_cpu*32 dirty pages. If the file_lru is in the
> 13..200 MiB range then there's absolutely no dirty throttling, which
> burdens vmscan with only dirty+writeback pages thus resorting to oom
> kill.
>
> It could be argued that tiny containers are not supported, but it's more
> subtle. It's the amount the space available for file lru that matters.
> If a container has memory.max-200MiB of non reclaimable memory, then it
> will also suffer such oom kills on a 100 cpu machine.
>
> The following test reliably ooms without this patch. This patch avoids
> oom kills.
>
> $ cat test
> mount -t cgroup2 none /dev/cgroup
> cd /dev/cgroup
> echo +io +memory > cgroup.subtree_control
> mkdir test
> cd test
> echo 10M > memory.max
> (echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec /memcg-writeback-stress /foo)
> (echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec dd if=/dev/zero of=/foo bs=2M
> count=100)
>
> $ cat memcg-writeback-stress.c
> /*
>* Dirty pages from all but one cpu.
>* Clean pages from the non dirtying cpu.
>* This is to stress per cpu counter imbalance.
>* On a 100 cpu machine:
>* - per memcg per cpu dirty count is 32 pages for each of 99 cpus
>* - per memcg atomic is -99*32 pages
>* - thus the complete dirty limit: sum of all counters 0
>* - balance_dirty_pages() only sees atomic count -99*32 pages, which
>* it max()s to 0.
>* - So a workload can dirty -99*32 pages before balance_dirty_pages()
>* cares.
>*/
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> static char *buf;
> static int bufSize;
>
> static void set_affinity(int cpu)
> {
> cpu_set_t affinity;
>
> CPU_ZERO(&affinity);
> CPU_SET(cpu, &affinity);
> if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(affinity), &affinity))
> err(1, "sched_setaffinity");
> }
>
> static void dirty_on(int output_fd, int cpu)
> {
> int i, wrote;
>
> set_affinity(cpu);
> for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> for (wrote = 0; wrote < bufSize; ) {
> int ret = write(output_fd, buf+wrote, bufSize-wrote);
> if (ret == -1)
> err(1, "write");
> wrote += ret;
> }
> }
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int cpu, flush_cpu = 1, output_fd;
> const char *output;
>
> if (argc != 2)
> errx(1, "usage: output_file");
>
> output = argv[1];
> bufSize = getpagesize();
> buf = malloc(getpagesize());
> if (buf == NULL)
> errx(1, "malloc failed");
>
> output_fd = open(output, O_CREAT|O_RDWR);
> if (output_fd == -1)
> err(1, "open(%s)", output);
>
> for (cpu = 0; cpu < get_nprocs(); cpu++) {
> if (cpu != flush_cpu)
> dirty_on(output_fd, cpu);
> }
>
> set_affinity(flush_cpu);
> if (fsync(output_fd))
> err(1, "fsync(%s)", output);
> if (close(output_fd))
> err(1, "close(%s)", output);
> free(buf);
> }
>
> Make balance_dirty_pages() and wb_over_bg_thresh() work harder to
> collect exact per memcg counters. This avoids the aforementioned oom
> kills.
>
> This does not affect the overhead of memory.stat, which still reads the
> single atomic counter.
>
> Why not use percpu_counter? memcg already handles cpus going offline,
> so no need for that overhead from percpu_counter. And the
> percpu_counter spinlocks are more heavyweight than is required.
>
> It probably also makes sense to use exact dirty and writeback counters
> in memcg oom reports. But that is saved for later.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen
Hi , Greg!
Looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin
Thanks!
[PATCH v2] writeback: use exact memcg dirty counts
Since commit a983b5ebee57 ("mm: memcontrol: fix excessive complexity in
memory.stat reporting") memcg dirty and writeback counters are managed
as:
1) per-memcg per-cpu values in range of [-32..32]
2) per-memcg atomic counter
When a per-cpu counter cannot fit in [-32..32] it's flushed to the
atomic. Stat readers only check the atomic.
Thus readers such as balance_dirty_pages() may see a nontrivial error
margin: 32 pages per cpu.
Assuming 100 cpus:
4k x86 page_size: 13 MiB error per memcg
64k ppc page_size: 200 MiB error per memcg
Considering that dirty+writeback are used together for some decisions
the errors double.
This inaccuracy can lead to undeserved oom kills. One nasty case is
when all per-cpu counters hold positive values offsetting an atomic
negative value (i.e. per_cpu[*]=32, atomic=n_cpu*-32).
balance_dirty_pages() only consults the atomic and does not consider
throttling the next n_cpu*32 dirty pages. If the file_lru is in the
13..200 MiB range then there's absolutely no dirty throttling, which
burdens vmscan with only dirty+writeback pages thus resorting to oom
kill.
It could be argued that tiny containers are not supported, but it's more
subtle. It's the amount the space available for file lru that matters.
If a container has memory.max-200MiB of non reclaimable memory, then it
will also suffer such oom kills on a 100 cpu machine.
The following test reliably ooms without this patch. This patch avoids
oom kills.
$ cat test
mount -t cgroup2 none /dev/cgroup
cd /dev/cgroup
echo +io +memory > cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir test
cd test
echo 10M > memory.max
(echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec /memcg-writeback-stress /foo)
(echo $BASHPID > cgroup.procs && exec dd if=/dev/zero of=/foo bs=2M count=100)
$ cat memcg-writeback-stress.c
/*
* Dirty pages from all but one cpu.
* Clean pages from the non dirtying cpu.
* This is to stress per cpu counter imbalance.
* On a 100 cpu machine:
* - per memcg per cpu dirty count is 32 pages for each of 99 cpus
* - per memcg atomic is -99*32 pages
* - thus the complete dirty limit: sum of all counters 0
* - balance_dirty_pages() only sees atomic count -99*32 pages, which
* it max()s to 0.
* - So a workload can dirty -99*32 pages before balance_dirty_pages()
* cares.
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
static char *buf;
static int bufSize;
static void set_affinity(int cpu)
{
cpu_set_t affinity;
CPU_ZERO(&affinity);
CPU_SET(cpu, &affinity);
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(affinity), &affinity))
err(1, "sched_setaffinity");
}
static void dirty_on(int output_fd, int cpu)
{
int i, wrote;
set_affinity(cpu);
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
for (wrote = 0; wrote < bufSize; ) {
int ret = write(output_fd, buf+wrote, bufSize-wrote);
if (ret == -1)
err(1, "write");
wrote += ret;
}
}
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int cpu, flush_cpu = 1, output_fd;
const char *output;
if (argc != 2)
errx(1, "usage: output_file");
output = argv[1];
bufSize = getpagesize();
buf = malloc(getpagesize());
if (buf == NULL)
errx(1, "malloc failed");
output_fd = open(output, O_CREAT|O_RDWR);
if (output_fd == -1)
err(1, "open(%s)", output);
for (cpu = 0; cpu < get_nprocs(); cpu++) {
if (cpu != flush_cpu)
dirty_on(output_fd, cpu);
}
set_affinity(flush_cpu);
if (fsync(output_fd))
err(1, "fsync(%s)", output);
if (close(output_fd))
err(1, "close(%s)", output);
free(buf);
}
Make balance_dirty_pages() and wb_over_bg_thresh() work harder to
collect exact per memcg counters. This avoids the aforementioned oom
kills.
This does not affect the overhead of memory.stat, which still reads the
single atomic counter.
Why not use percpu_counter? memcg already handles cpus going offline,
so no need for that overhead from percpu_counter. And the
percpu_counter spinlocks are more heavyweight than is required.
It probably also makes sense to use exact dirty and writeback counters
in memcg oom reports. But that is saved for later.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.16+
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen
---
Changelog since v1:
- Move memcg_exact_page_state() into memcontrol.c.
- Unconditionally gather exact (per cpu) counters in mem_cgroup_wb_stats(), it's
not called in performance sensitive paths.
- Unconditionally check for underflow regardless of CONFIG_SMP. It's just
easier this way. This isn't performance sensitive.
- Add stable tag.
include/linux/memcontrol.h |
