Re: [PATCH v3] EDAC/mc_sysfs: refactor deprecated strncpy

2023-09-14 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 05:20:50PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
> 
> We should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string interfaces.
> 
> A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
> guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer without needlessly
> NUL-padding.
> 
> Link: 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
>  [1]
> Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html 
> [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: linux-harden...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt 
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - prefer strscpy to strscpy_pad (thanks Tony)
> - Link to v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-v2-1-2d2e6bd43...@google.com
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - included refactor of another strncpy in same file
> - Link to v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-v1-1-d232891b0...@google.com
> ---
> Note: build-tested only.
> ---
>  drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> index 15f63452a9be..9a5b4bbd8191 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_dimm_label_store(struct device 
> *dev,
>   if (copy_count == 0 || copy_count >= sizeof(rank->dimm->label))
>   return -EINVAL;
>  
> - strncpy(rank->dimm->label, data, copy_count);
> - rank->dimm->label[copy_count] = '\0';
> + strscpy(rank->dimm->label, data, copy_count);

Hrm, I don't like the use of "copy_count" here -- it's the source
length, not the destination buffer size. It is technically safe because
it was bounds-checked right before, but now we run the risk of
additional truncation since "copy_count" will not include the '\0'.

Imagine data = "a", count = 1. strscpy(dst, data, 1) will only copy
'\0'.

I think this should be memcpy(), not strscpy(). The bounds checking and
truncation of '\n' has already been calculated -- we're just doing a
byte copy at this point:

if (count == 0)
return -EINVAL;

if (data[count - 1] == '\0' || data[count - 1] == '\n')
copy_count -= 1;

if (copy_count == 0 || copy_count >= sizeof(rank->dimm->label))
return -EINVAL;

memcpy(rank->dimm->label, data, copy_count);
rank->dimm->label[copy_count] = '\0';



>  
>   return count;
>  }
> @@ -535,7 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t dimmdev_label_store(struct device *dev,
>   if (copy_count == 0 || copy_count >= sizeof(dimm->label))
>   return -EINVAL;
>  
> - strncpy(dimm->label, data, copy_count);
> + strscpy(dimm->label, data, copy_count);
>   dimm->label[copy_count] = '\0';

Same for this one: replace strncpy with memcpy.

-Kees

>  
>   return count;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c
> change-id: 20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-e619b00124a3
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Justin Stitt 
> 

-- 
Kees Cook


[PATCH v3] EDAC/mc_sysfs: refactor deprecated strncpy

2023-09-13 Thread Justin Stitt
`strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].

We should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string interfaces.

A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer without needlessly
NUL-padding.

Link: 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
 [1]
Link: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
Cc: linux-harden...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt 
---
Changes in v3:
- prefer strscpy to strscpy_pad (thanks Tony)
- Link to v2: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-v2-1-2d2e6bd43...@google.com

Changes in v2:
- included refactor of another strncpy in same file
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-v1-1-d232891b0...@google.com
---
Note: build-tested only.
---
 drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
index 15f63452a9be..9a5b4bbd8191 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
@@ -229,8 +229,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_dimm_label_store(struct device *dev,
if (copy_count == 0 || copy_count >= sizeof(rank->dimm->label))
return -EINVAL;
 
-   strncpy(rank->dimm->label, data, copy_count);
-   rank->dimm->label[copy_count] = '\0';
+   strscpy(rank->dimm->label, data, copy_count);
 
return count;
 }
@@ -535,7 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t dimmdev_label_store(struct device *dev,
if (copy_count == 0 || copy_count >= sizeof(dimm->label))
return -EINVAL;
 
-   strncpy(dimm->label, data, copy_count);
+   strscpy(dimm->label, data, copy_count);
dimm->label[copy_count] = '\0';
 
return count;

---
base-commit: 2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c
change-id: 20230913-strncpy-drivers-edac-edac_mc_sysfs-c-e619b00124a3

Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt