[PATCH v3] IB/srpt: Remove WARN_ON from srpt_cm_req_recv
The callers pass the pointer '&req' or 'private_data' to srpt_cm_req_recv(), and 'private_data' is initialized in srp_send_req(). 'sdev' is allocated and stored in srpt_add_one(). It's easy to show that sdev and req are always valid. So we remove unnecessary WARN_ON. Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c index ef7fcd3..0fa65c6 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c @@ -2156,9 +2156,6 @@ static int srpt_cm_req_recv(struct srpt_device *const sdev, WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()); - if (WARN_ON(!sdev || !req)) - return -EINVAL; - it_iu_len = be32_to_cpu(req->req_it_iu_len); pr_info("Received SRP_LOGIN_REQ with i_port_id %pI6, t_port_id %pI6 and it_iu_len %d on port %d (guid=%pI6); pkey %#04x\n", -- 1.8.3.1
Re: [PATCH v3] IB/srpt: Remove WARN_ON from srpt_cm_req_recv
On 2020-06-17 07:08, Jing Xiangfeng wrote: > The callers pass the pointer '&req' or 'private_data' to > srpt_cm_req_recv(), and 'private_data' is initialized in srp_send_req(). > 'sdev' is allocated and stored in srpt_add_one(). It's easy to show that > sdev and req are always valid. So we remove unnecessary WARN_ON. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
Re: [PATCH v3] IB/srpt: Remove WARN_ON from srpt_cm_req_recv
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:08:03PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote: > The callers pass the pointer '&req' or 'private_data' to > srpt_cm_req_recv(), and 'private_data' is initialized in srp_send_req(). > 'sdev' is allocated and stored in srpt_add_one(). It's easy to show that > sdev and req are always valid. So we remove unnecessary WARN_ON. > > Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche > --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) Applied to for-next, thanks Jason