Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] powerpc/smp: Dont assume l2-cache to be superset of sibling

2020-07-24 Thread Gautham R Shenoy


On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:21:11PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Current code assumes that cpumask of cpus sharing a l2-cache mask will
> always be a superset of cpu_sibling_mask.
> 
> Lets stop that assumption. cpu_l2_cache_mask is a superset of
> cpu_sibling_mask if and only if shared_caches is set.
> 
> Cc: linuxppc-dev 
> Cc: LKML 
> Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin 
> Cc: Anton Blanchard 
> Cc: Oliver O'Halloran 
> Cc: Nathan Lynch 
> Cc: Michael Neuling 
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
> Cc: Valentin Schneider 
> Cc: Jordan Niethe 
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju 

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy 

> ---
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
>   Set cpumask after verifying l2-cache. (Gautham)
> 
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 28 +++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index da27f6909be1..d997c7411664 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ static bool update_mask_by_l2(int cpu, struct cpumask 
> *(*mask_fn)(int))
>   if (!l2_cache)
>   return false;
> 
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask_fn(cpu));
>   for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask) {
>   /*
>* when updating the marks the current CPU has not been marked
> @@ -1276,29 +1277,30 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
>* add it to it's own thread sibling mask.
>*/
>   cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
> 
>   for (i = first_thread; i < first_thread + threads_per_core; i++)
>   if (cpu_online(i))
>   set_cpus_related(i, cpu, cpu_sibling_mask);
> 
>   add_cpu_to_smallcore_masks(cpu);
> - /*
> -  * Copy the thread sibling mask into the cache sibling mask
> -  * and mark any CPUs that share an L2 with this CPU.
> -  */
> - for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu))
> - set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_l2_cache_mask);
>   update_mask_by_l2(cpu, cpu_l2_cache_mask);
> 
> - /*
> -  * Copy the cache sibling mask into core sibling mask and mark
> -  * any CPUs on the same chip as this CPU.
> -  */
> - for_each_cpu(i, cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu))
> - set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
> + if (pkg_id == -1) {
> + struct cpumask *(*mask)(int) = cpu_sibling_mask;
> +
> + /*
> +  * Copy the sibling mask into core sibling mask and
> +  * mark any CPUs on the same chip as this CPU.
> +  */
> + if (shared_caches)
> + mask = cpu_l2_cache_mask;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i, mask(cpu))
> + set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
> 
> - if (pkg_id == -1)
>   return;
> + }
> 
>   for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask)
>   if (get_physical_package_id(i) == pkg_id)
> -- 
> 2.18.2
> 


[PATCH v3 05/10] powerpc/smp: Dont assume l2-cache to be superset of sibling

2020-07-23 Thread Srikar Dronamraju
Current code assumes that cpumask of cpus sharing a l2-cache mask will
always be a superset of cpu_sibling_mask.

Lets stop that assumption. cpu_l2_cache_mask is a superset of
cpu_sibling_mask if and only if shared_caches is set.

Cc: linuxppc-dev 
Cc: LKML 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Nicholas Piggin 
Cc: Anton Blanchard 
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran 
Cc: Nathan Lynch 
Cc: Michael Neuling 
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Valentin Schneider 
Cc: Jordan Niethe 
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju 
---
Changelog v1 -> v2:
Set cpumask after verifying l2-cache. (Gautham)

 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 28 +++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index da27f6909be1..d997c7411664 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ static bool update_mask_by_l2(int cpu, struct cpumask 
*(*mask_fn)(int))
if (!l2_cache)
return false;
 
+   cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask_fn(cpu));
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask) {
/*
 * when updating the marks the current CPU has not been marked
@@ -1276,29 +1277,30 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
 * add it to it's own thread sibling mask.
 */
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+   cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
 
for (i = first_thread; i < first_thread + threads_per_core; i++)
if (cpu_online(i))
set_cpus_related(i, cpu, cpu_sibling_mask);
 
add_cpu_to_smallcore_masks(cpu);
-   /*
-* Copy the thread sibling mask into the cache sibling mask
-* and mark any CPUs that share an L2 with this CPU.
-*/
-   for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu))
-   set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_l2_cache_mask);
update_mask_by_l2(cpu, cpu_l2_cache_mask);
 
-   /*
-* Copy the cache sibling mask into core sibling mask and mark
-* any CPUs on the same chip as this CPU.
-*/
-   for_each_cpu(i, cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu))
-   set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
+   if (pkg_id == -1) {
+   struct cpumask *(*mask)(int) = cpu_sibling_mask;
+
+   /*
+* Copy the sibling mask into core sibling mask and
+* mark any CPUs on the same chip as this CPU.
+*/
+   if (shared_caches)
+   mask = cpu_l2_cache_mask;
+
+   for_each_cpu(i, mask(cpu))
+   set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
 
-   if (pkg_id == -1)
return;
+   }
 
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask)
if (get_physical_package_id(i) == pkg_id)
-- 
2.18.2