[PATCH v4 02/13] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
From: Graeme Gregory
Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
values can not be used in core ACPI code.
Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
is not a suitable value for ARM64.
What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h |5 +
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h |5 +
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
#define acpi_noirq 0 /* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
#define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
#define acpi_strict 1 /* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
+
+static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
+{
+ return acpi_lapic;
+}
#endif
#define acpi_processor_cstate_check(x) (x) /* no idle limits on IA64 :) */
static inline void disable_acpi(void) { }
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index e06225e..939d377 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
}
+static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
+{
+ return acpi_lapic;
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 1c08574..8622a0e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device
*device)
pr->apic_id = apic_id;
cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
- if (!cpu0_initialized && !acpi_lapic) {
+ if (!cpu0_initialized && !acpi_arch_is_smp()) {
cpu0_initialized = 1;
/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
if ((cpu_index == -1) && (num_online_cpus() == 1))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v4 02/13] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
values can not be used in core ACPI code.
Following on the patch ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
during initialization which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
is not a suitable value for ARM64.
What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h |5 +
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h |5 +
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
#define acpi_noirq 0 /* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
#define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
#define acpi_strict 1 /* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
+
+static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
+{
+ return acpi_lapic;
+}
#endif
#define acpi_processor_cstate_check(x) (x) /* no idle limits on IA64 :) */
static inline void disable_acpi(void) { }
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index e06225e..939d377 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
buf[2] = ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
}
+static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
+{
+ return acpi_lapic;
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 1c08574..8622a0e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device
*device)
pr-apic_id = apic_id;
cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr-apic_id, pr-acpi_id);
- if (!cpu0_initialized !acpi_lapic) {
+ if (!cpu0_initialized !acpi_arch_is_smp()) {
cpu0_initialized = 1;
/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
if ((cpu_index == -1) (num_online_cpus() == 1))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
