RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> > This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> > patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> > [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> 
>  Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
>  and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> >>>
> >>>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> >>> Where can
> >>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> >>> include
> >>> into my set.
> >>
> >> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
> >> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
> >> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
> >>
> >> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.
> >
> >  Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, 
> > and my patch
> actually doesn't need it. I could do some
> > blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at 
> > all.
> >  As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can 
> > they be picked up
> independently? They don't need 0002 by
> > themselves, only 0005 needs it.
> 
> Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I
> was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is
> not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently.
> 
> If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window.

 They should. I have quite recent linux-next tree, i've just checked,
0003 applies with a small fuzz and 0004 applies without problems at all.

> If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take
> care of them?

 Of course. Please notify me if rebasing will be needed, i'll do it.

> You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right?

 Of course. And you can already get my

Tested-by: Pavel Fedin 

 on those two because my experimental tree already uses them, and
everything works quite well.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05.11.2015 17:44, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

 Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
 and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
>>>
>>>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
>>> Where can
>>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
>>> include
>>> into my set.
>>
>> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
>> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
>> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
>>
>> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.
> 
>  Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, 
> and my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some
> blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all.
>  As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can 
> they be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by
> themselves, only 0005 needs it.

Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I
was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is
not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently.

If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window.
If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take
care of them? You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> >>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> >>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> >>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> >>
> >> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
> >> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> >
> >  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> > Where can
> > i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> > include
> > into my set.
> 
> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
> 
> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.

 Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and 
my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some
blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all.
 As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they 
be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by
themselves, only 0005 needs it.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05.11.2015 16:59, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
>>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
>>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
>>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
>>
>> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
>> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> 
>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> Where can
> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> include
> into my set.

Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).

Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> > This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> > patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> > [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> 
> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...

 I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where 
can
i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
include
into my set.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> > This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> > patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> > [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> 
>  Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
>  and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> >>>
> >>>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> >>> Where can
> >>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> >>> include
> >>> into my set.
> >>
> >> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
> >> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
> >> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
> >>
> >> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.
> >
> >  Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, 
> > and my patch
> actually doesn't need it. I could do some
> > blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at 
> > all.
> >  As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can 
> > they be picked up
> independently? They don't need 0002 by
> > themselves, only 0005 needs it.
> 
> Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I
> was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is
> not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently.
> 
> If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window.

 They should. I have quite recent linux-next tree, i've just checked,
0003 applies with a small fuzz and 0004 applies without problems at all.

> If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take
> care of them?

 Of course. Please notify me if rebasing will be needed, i'll do it.

> You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right?

 Of course. And you can already get my

Tested-by: Pavel Fedin 

 on those two because my experimental tree already uses them, and
everything works quite well.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> > This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> > patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> > [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> 
> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...

 I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where 
can
i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
include
into my set.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05.11.2015 16:59, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
>>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
>>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
>>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
>>
>> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
>> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> 
>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> Where can
> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> include
> into my set.

Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).

Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

 Hello!

> >>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> >>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> >>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html
> >>
> >> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
> >> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
> >
> >  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
> > Where can
> > i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
> > include
> > into my set.
> 
> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
> 
> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.

 Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and 
my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some
blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all.
 As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they 
be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by
themselves, only 0005 needs it.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 05.11.2015 17:44, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

 Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
 and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...
>>>
>>>  I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. 
>>> Where can
>>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and 
>>> include
>>> into my set.
>>
>> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html
>> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in
>> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed).
>>
>> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper.
> 
>  Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, 
> and my patch actually doesn't need it. I could do some
> blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all.
>  As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can 
> they be picked up independently? They don't need 0002 by
> themselves, only 0005 needs it.

Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I
was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is
not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently.

If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window.
If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take
care of them? You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03.11.2015 18:16, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
> controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
> which is connected via SROMc bank #3.
> 
> With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
> Actually, only bank number is different.
> 
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
which is connected via SROMc bank #3.

With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
Actually, only bank number is different.

This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
[PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

Pinctrl support is necessary in order to correctly configure
multifunctional pins of the Exynos chip.

v4 => v5:
- Some cosmetic changes in the dtsi ("compatible" goes first)
- Use correctly specified ranges for the SROMc node
- Reuse existing properties where possible ("reg" for bank# and
  "reg-io-width" for data width)
- Separated page-mode property from timings array
- More improvements to the documentation

v3 => v4:
- Devices are now added as subnodes, with additional properties. This allows
  to cleary specify dependency. If configuration fails, error will be reported
  and child devices will not be probed.
- These additional properties now have "samsung,srom-XXX" format
- Fixed code style, now better understood.

v2 => v3:
- Fixed up SROMc region size in the device tree
- Reordered patches, documentation goes first now

v1 => v2:
- Fixed some typos and bad labels in device tree
- Improved documentation

Pavel Fedin (4):
  Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration
  ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410
  drivers: exynos-srom: Add support for bank configuration
  ARM: dts: Add Ethernet chip to SMDK5410

 .../bindings/arm/samsung/exynos-srom.txt   | 68 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts  | 40 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi  | 11 
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig   |  2 +-
 drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig|  2 +-
 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.c  | 60 ++-
 6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Pavel Fedin]

This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
which is connected via SROMc bank #3.

With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
Actually, only bank number is different.

This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
[PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

Pinctrl support is necessary in order to correctly configure
multifunctional pins of the Exynos chip.

v4 => v5:
- Some cosmetic changes in the dtsi ("compatible" goes first)
- Use correctly specified ranges for the SROMc node
- Reuse existing properties where possible ("reg" for bank# and
  "reg-io-width" for data width)
- Separated page-mode property from timings array
- More improvements to the documentation

v3 => v4:
- Devices are now added as subnodes, with additional properties. This allows
  to cleary specify dependency. If configuration fails, error will be reported
  and child devices will not be probed.
- These additional properties now have "samsung,srom-XXX" format
- Fixed code style, now better understood.

v2 => v3:
- Fixed up SROMc region size in the device tree
- Reordered patches, documentation goes first now

v1 => v2:
- Fixed some typos and bad labels in device tree
- Improved documentation

Pavel Fedin (4):
  Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration
  ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410
  drivers: exynos-srom: Add support for bank configuration
  ARM: dts: Add Ethernet chip to SMDK5410

 .../bindings/arm/samsung/exynos-srom.txt   | 68 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-smdk5410.dts  | 40 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi  | 11 
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig   |  2 +-
 drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig|  2 +-
 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-srom.c  | 60 ++-
 6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03.11.2015 18:16, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> This patch extends Exynos SROM controller driver with ability to configure
> controller outputs and enables SMSC9115 Ethernet chip on SMDK5410 board,
> which is connected via SROMc bank #3.
> 
> With this patchset, support for the whole existing SMDK range can be added.
> Actually, only bank number is different.
> 
> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by
> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set:
> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html

Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback
and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/