Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration for Exynos5420

2014-05-15 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi Tomasz,

On 16 May 2014 02:56, Tomasz Figa  wrote:
> Hi Chander,
>
> On 14.05.2014 10:03, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle 
>> driver.
>> Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano 
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c |3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
>> index 3dd385e..807a386 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>   int cpu_id, ret;
>>   struct cpuidle_device *device;
>>
>> + if (soc_is_exynos5420())
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>   if (soc_is_exynos5250())
>>   exynos5_core_down_clk();
>>
>>
>
> Why not put this in exynos.c in exynos_dt_machine_init(), so
> exynos_cpuidle_init() is called only if not running on Exynos5420?
>

That makes more sense.
I will update this

Thanks
> Best regards,
> Tomasz



-- 
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration for Exynos5420

2014-05-15 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Chander,

On 14.05.2014 10:03, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle 
> driver.
> Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano 
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c |3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> index 3dd385e..807a386 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   int cpu_id, ret;
>   struct cpuidle_device *device;
>  
> + if (soc_is_exynos5420())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
>   if (soc_is_exynos5250())
>   exynos5_core_down_clk();
>  
> 

Why not put this in exynos.c in exynos_dt_machine_init(), so
exynos_cpuidle_init() is called only if not running on Exynos5420?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH v5 5/6] exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration for Exynos5420

2014-05-14 Thread Chander Kashyap
Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle driver.
Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420.

Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap 
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano 
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c |3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
index 3dd385e..807a386 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
int cpu_id, ret;
struct cpuidle_device *device;
 
+   if (soc_is_exynos5420())
+   return -ENODEV;
+
if (soc_is_exynos5250())
exynos5_core_down_clk();
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/