Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Apologies for the delay on this. > > > >> > Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this > >> > series (Patches 1 & 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. > >> > > >> > >> Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom > >> hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both > >> series are blocked on getting the binding acks. > > > > Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: > > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > Great, thanks a lot Mark! All 4 patches in this series have been applied, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote: Hi, Apologies for the delay on this. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both series are blocked on getting the binding acks. Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com Great, thanks a lot Mark! All 4 patches in this series have been applied, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies for the delay on this. > >> > Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this >> > series (Patches 1 & 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. >> > >> >> Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom >> hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both >> series are blocked on getting the binding acks. > > Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland Great, thanks a lot Mark! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
Hi, Apologies for the delay on this. > > Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this > > series (Patches 1 & 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. > > > > Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom > hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both > series are blocked on getting the binding acks. Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
Hi, Apologies for the delay on this. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both series are blocked on getting the binding acks. Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote: Hi, Apologies for the delay on this. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both series are blocked on getting the binding acks. Both the bindings look sane to me, so for patches 1 and 3: Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com Great, thanks a lot Mark! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
Mark, On 03/18/2015 04:57 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: >> Hi Suman, >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna wrote: >>> This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, >>> rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the >>> bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it >>> into 4.1. >> >> From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! >> >>> Mark, >>> Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents >>> so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? >> >> That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with >> this towards 4.1. > > Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this > series (Patches 1 & 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. > Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both series are blocked on getting the binding acks. regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
Mark, On 03/18/2015 04:57 PM, Suman Anna wrote: Hi Mark, On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: Hi Suman, On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote: This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it into 4.1. From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! Mark, Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with this towards 4.1. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Ping again, if you can provide your ack on these bindings and the qcom hwmutex bindings, then Ohad can pick up both the series for 4.1. Both series are blocked on getting the binding acks. regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
Hi Mark, On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Hi Suman, > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna wrote: >> This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, >> rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the >> bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it >> into 4.1. > > From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! > >> Mark, >> Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents >> so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? > > That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with > this towards 4.1. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 & 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Thanks Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
Hi Mark, On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: Hi Suman, On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote: This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it into 4.1. From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! Mark, Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with this towards 4.1. Gentle reminder. Can you please provide your ack on the bindings in this series (Patches 1 3) for Ohad to queue up the series for 4.1. Thanks Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
Hi Suman, On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, > rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the > bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it > into 4.1. >From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! > Mark, > Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents > so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with this towards 4.1. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
Hi Suman, On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote: This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it into 4.1. From a quick glance this looks great, thanks! Mark, Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? That would be perfect. Once we'll have it I could move forward with this towards 4.1. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core & omap dt support
Hi Ohad, This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it into 4.1. Mark, Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? Following are the main changes in v8 w.r.t v7: - Revised the generic hwspinlock bindings to remove hwlock-base-id and hwlock-num-locks properties, and added the optional hwlock-names property. - Updated the core device tree patch to remove of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() and of_hwspin_lock_get_num_locks() functions. Reworked the of_hwspin_lock_get_id() API to not use the list of registered hwspinlock banks, but rely on the hwspinlock radix tree itself to perform deferred probing and pargs lock specifier validation. The last of the two were added in v6, but dropped in v7, and are now restored. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock binding and DT support patches for the absence of the v7's mandatory hwlock-base-id property. - Changed the order of patches slightly to lump the core changes together and the OMAP hwspinlock changes together. The validation logs on all the applicable OMAP SoCs are at: OMAP4 : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533448/ OMAP5 : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533710/ DRA7 (X15) : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533486/ AM33xx : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533623/ AM43xx : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533538/ The above logs are generated with some additional test patches staged here for reference, https://github.com/sumananna/omap-kernel/commits/hwspinlock/test/4.0-rc1-dt-v8 regards Suman [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5635201/ --- v7: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=142126914027417=2 - Dropped the patch "hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks" - Updated generic hwspinlock bindings to make hwlock-base-id property mandatory. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock binding and DT support patches to correct for the mandatory hwlock-base-id property. - Updated the common OF helpers patch to move the of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() and of_hwspin_lock_get_num_locks() functions into the internal header, these are no longer exported, but available for platform implementations. of_hwspin_lock_get_id() is also simplified now. v6: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=141055365213895=2 - of_hwspin_lock_request_specific() is replaced with of_hwspin_lock_get_id(). of_hwspin_lock_simple_xlate() is made internal, and of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() is added. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock DT support patch to assign base-id from DT if present - RFC patches adding the concept of reserved locks and return code change convention dropped. v5: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=139890478402807=2 - Rebased v4 patches plus additional RFC patches. - Added back the patch to support DT-based hwlock-base-id property, for registration purposes. - RFC patches introducing the concept of reserved locks. - Staged patches for converting return convention to better support deferred probing of client drivers. v4: - The DT bindings are split into separate patches, and updated to add comments about #hwlock-cells - Fixed a registration issue with repeated module installation and removal. - Added a new OF helper to support #hwlock-cells in addition to the previous OF functions. The OMAP adaptation patch is updated to use the default translate function - Updated hwspinlock documentation to adjust for the structure changes and the new api additions. - Added build support for AM335x, AM43xx and DRA7xx http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=138965904015225=2 v3: - Removed the DT property hwlock-base-id and associated OF helper - Added changes in core to support requesting a specific hwlock using phandle + args approach - Revised both the common and OMAP DT bindings document http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=138143992932197=2 v2: - Added a new common DT binding documentation and OF helpers. - Revised OMAP DT parse support to use the new OF helper (Patch2) - OMAP5 hwspinlock support including the hwmod entry and DT node - Add AM335x support to OMAP hwspinlock driver, including a fix needed in driver given that AM335 spinlock module requires s/w wakeup - AM335 DT node for spinlock, and a hwmod change to enable smart-idle for AM335. - OMAP4 DT node patch is unchanged http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=137944644112727=2 v1: - Add DT parse support to OMAP hwspinlock driver - Add OMAP4 DT node and bindings information http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap=137823082308009=2 --- Suman Anna (4): Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock hwspinlock/core: add device tree support Documentation: dt: add the omap hwspinlock bindings document hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt | 59 .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt | 26 +++
[PATCH v8 0/4] hwspinlock core omap dt support
Hi Ohad, This is the latest version of the hwspinlock dt support series, rebased onto v4.0-rc1 and addressing the long discussion on the bindings in v7 [1]. I really hope that this series can make it into 4.1. Mark, Can you please provide your Acked-by for the binding documents so that Ohad can pick up the patches for the next merge window? Following are the main changes in v8 w.r.t v7: - Revised the generic hwspinlock bindings to remove hwlock-base-id and hwlock-num-locks properties, and added the optional hwlock-names property. - Updated the core device tree patch to remove of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() and of_hwspin_lock_get_num_locks() functions. Reworked the of_hwspin_lock_get_id() API to not use the list of registered hwspinlock banks, but rely on the hwspinlock radix tree itself to perform deferred probing and pargs lock specifier validation. The last of the two were added in v6, but dropped in v7, and are now restored. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock binding and DT support patches for the absence of the v7's mandatory hwlock-base-id property. - Changed the order of patches slightly to lump the core changes together and the OMAP hwspinlock changes together. The validation logs on all the applicable OMAP SoCs are at: OMAP4 : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533448/ OMAP5 : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533710/ DRA7 (X15) : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533486/ AM33xx : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533623/ AM43xx : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10533538/ The above logs are generated with some additional test patches staged here for reference, https://github.com/sumananna/omap-kernel/commits/hwspinlock/test/4.0-rc1-dt-v8 regards Suman [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5635201/ --- v7: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=142126914027417w=2 - Dropped the patch hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks - Updated generic hwspinlock bindings to make hwlock-base-id property mandatory. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock binding and DT support patches to correct for the mandatory hwlock-base-id property. - Updated the common OF helpers patch to move the of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() and of_hwspin_lock_get_num_locks() functions into the internal header, these are no longer exported, but available for platform implementations. of_hwspin_lock_get_id() is also simplified now. v6: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=141055365213895w=2 - of_hwspin_lock_request_specific() is replaced with of_hwspin_lock_get_id(). of_hwspin_lock_simple_xlate() is made internal, and of_hwspin_lock_get_base_id() is added. - Updated the OMAP hwspinlock DT support patch to assign base-id from DT if present - RFC patches adding the concept of reserved locks and return code change convention dropped. v5: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=139890478402807w=2 - Rebased v4 patches plus additional RFC patches. - Added back the patch to support DT-based hwlock-base-id property, for registration purposes. - RFC patches introducing the concept of reserved locks. - Staged patches for converting return convention to better support deferred probing of client drivers. v4: - The DT bindings are split into separate patches, and updated to add comments about #hwlock-cells - Fixed a registration issue with repeated module installation and removal. - Added a new OF helper to support #hwlock-cells in addition to the previous OF functions. The OMAP adaptation patch is updated to use the default translate function - Updated hwspinlock documentation to adjust for the structure changes and the new api additions. - Added build support for AM335x, AM43xx and DRA7xx http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=138965904015225w=2 v3: - Removed the DT property hwlock-base-id and associated OF helper - Added changes in core to support requesting a specific hwlock using phandle + args approach - Revised both the common and OMAP DT bindings document http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=138143992932197w=2 v2: - Added a new common DT binding documentation and OF helpers. - Revised OMAP DT parse support to use the new OF helper (Patch2) - OMAP5 hwspinlock support including the hwmod entry and DT node - Add AM335x support to OMAP hwspinlock driver, including a fix needed in driver given that AM335 spinlock module requires s/w wakeup - AM335 DT node for spinlock, and a hwmod change to enable smart-idle for AM335. - OMAP4 DT node patch is unchanged http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=137944644112727w=2 v1: - Add DT parse support to OMAP hwspinlock driver - Add OMAP4 DT node and bindings information http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=137823082308009w=2 --- Suman Anna (4): Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock hwspinlock/core: add device tree support Documentation: dt: add the omap hwspinlock bindings document hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt | 59 .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt