Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK

2018-09-27 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2018-09-12 15:33:44 [+0200], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> There is no user of _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK since commit 21d375b6b34ff
> ("x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 fast path").
> Remove unused define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 

Is it okay for that one to be merged as-is or should I repost it without
the RFC?

Sebastian


[RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK

2018-09-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
There is no user of _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK since commit 21d375b6b34ff
("x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 fast path").
Remove unused define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 8 
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 2ff2a30a264f4..cd6920674b905 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -136,14 +136,6 @@ struct thread_info {
 _TIF_SECCOMP | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT |   \
 _TIF_NOHZ)
 
-/* work to do on any return to user space */
-#define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK  \
-   (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_SIGPENDING |\
-_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SINGLESTEP | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU |   \
-_TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY | _TIF_UPROBE |   \
-_TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_NOHZ | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | \
-_TIF_FSCHECK)
-
 /* flags to check in __switch_to() */
 #define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW
\
(_TIF_IO_BITMAP|_TIF_NOCPUID|_TIF_NOTSC|_TIF_BLOCKSTEP|_TIF_SSBD)
-- 
2.19.0