Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:52 PM Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:43 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 AM Linus Walleij > > wrote: > > > I do not understand why a PCI device would need a DT binding > > > at all. They just probe from the magic number in the PCI > > > config space, they spawn struct pci_dev PCI devices, not the > > > type of platform devices coming out of the DT parser code. > > > No DT compatible needed. > > > > Same reason for all the discoverable buses need bindings. There can be > > parts that are not discoverable or connections with non-discoverable > > nodes. There's also cases where the discoverable device has to be > > powered, reset deasserted, clocks enabled, etc. first to be > > discovered. > > > > If the GPIOs here had connections elsewhere in the DT, then we have to > > describe the provider in DT. > > this is exactly what I need it for: that platform has hand-written > .dts files and I need to wire up a GPIO LED Aha I get it! OK then :) Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
Hi Linus, On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:43 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 AM Linus Walleij > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:58 PM Martin Blumenstingl > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:19 AM Linus Walleij > > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +properties: > > > > > + compatible: > > > > > +enum: > > > > > + - pci1b6f,7023 > > > > > + - pci1b6f,7052 > > > > > > > > I think it is better to let the PCI driver for the whole hardware in > > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c probe from the PCI configuration space > > > > numbers, and then add a gpio_chip to xhci-pci.c. > > > > > > to have everything consistent I will move the binding to > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb > > > > I do not understand why a PCI device would need a DT binding > > at all. They just probe from the magic number in the PCI > > config space, they spawn struct pci_dev PCI devices, not the > > type of platform devices coming out of the DT parser code. > > No DT compatible needed. > > Same reason for all the discoverable buses need bindings. There can be > parts that are not discoverable or connections with non-discoverable > nodes. There's also cases where the discoverable device has to be > powered, reset deasserted, clocks enabled, etc. first to be > discovered. > > If the GPIOs here had connections elsewhere in the DT, then we have to > describe the provider in DT. this is exactly what I need it for: that platform has hand-written .dts files and I need to wire up a GPIO LED Best regards, Martin
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:58 PM Martin Blumenstingl > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:19 AM Linus Walleij > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > +enum: > > > > + - pci1b6f,7023 > > > > + - pci1b6f,7052 > > > > > > I think it is better to let the PCI driver for the whole hardware in > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c probe from the PCI configuration space > > > numbers, and then add a gpio_chip to xhci-pci.c. > > > > to have everything consistent I will move the binding to > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb > > I do not understand why a PCI device would need a DT binding > at all. They just probe from the magic number in the PCI > config space, they spawn struct pci_dev PCI devices, not the > type of platform devices coming out of the DT parser code. > No DT compatible needed. Same reason for all the discoverable buses need bindings. There can be parts that are not discoverable or connections with non-discoverable nodes. There's also cases where the discoverable device has to be powered, reset deasserted, clocks enabled, etc. first to be discovered. If the GPIOs here had connections elsewhere in the DT, then we have to describe the provider in DT. Rob
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:58 PM Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:19 AM Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl > > wrote: > > > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > +enum: > > > + - pci1b6f,7023 > > > + - pci1b6f,7052 > > > > I think it is better to let the PCI driver for the whole hardware in > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c probe from the PCI configuration space > > numbers, and then add a gpio_chip to xhci-pci.c. > > to have everything consistent I will move the binding to > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb I do not understand why a PCI device would need a DT binding at all. They just probe from the magic number in the PCI config space, they spawn struct pci_dev PCI devices, not the type of platform devices coming out of the DT parser code. No DT compatible needed. What am I not understanding about this? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
Hi Linus, On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:19 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl > wrote: > > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > +enum: > > + - pci1b6f,7023 > > + - pci1b6f,7052 > > I think it is better to let the PCI driver for the whole hardware in > drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c probe from the PCI configuration space > numbers, and then add a gpio_chip to xhci-pci.c. to have everything consistent I will move the binding to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb Best regards, Martin
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 11:25 PM Rob Herring wrote:
[...]
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + pcie {
> > +#address-cells = <3>;
> > +#size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +gpio@0,0,0 {
> > + compatible = "pci1b6f,7023";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +};
>
> How would this look if you needed to describe the XHCI controller?
> That's another PCI function?
unfortunately I have no documentation about this
the "reference driver" is poking the PCI config space registers of the
xHCI controller - without any dedicated function for this
Best regards,
Martin
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > +properties: > + compatible: > +enum: > + - pci1b6f,7023 > + - pci1b6f,7052 I think it is better to let the PCI driver for the whole hardware in drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c probe from the PCI configuration space numbers, and then add a gpio_chip to xhci-pci.c. Thanks! Linus Walleij
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198 are USB xHCI host controllers which embed a GPIO
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml | 48 +++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index ..fa554045bdb5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: GPIO controller embedded into the EJ168/EJ188/EJ198 xHCI controllers
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Martin Blumenstingl
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> +enum:
> + - pci1b6f,7023
> + - pci1b6f,7052
> +
> + reg:
> +maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#gpio-cells":
> +const: 2
> +
> + gpio-controller: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#gpio-cells"
> + - gpio-controller
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + pcie {
> +#address-cells = <3>;
> +#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +gpio@0,0,0 {
> + compatible = "pci1b6f,7023";
> + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1000>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +};
How would this look if you needed to describe the XHCI controller?
That's another PCI function?
> + };
> +
> +...
> --
> 2.28.0
>
[RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198
Etron EJ168/EJ188/EJ198 are USB xHCI host controllers which embed a GPIO
controller.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml | 48 +++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
new file mode 100644
index ..fa554045bdb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/etron,ej1x8.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: GPIO controller embedded into the EJ168/EJ188/EJ198 xHCI controllers
+
+maintainers:
+ - Martin Blumenstingl
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+enum:
+ - pci1b6f,7023
+ - pci1b6f,7052
+
+ reg:
+maxItems: 1
+
+ "#gpio-cells":
+const: 2
+
+ gpio-controller: true
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - "#gpio-cells"
+ - gpio-controller
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ pcie {
+#address-cells = <3>;
+#size-cells = <2>;
+
+gpio@0,0,0 {
+ compatible = "pci1b6f,7023";
+ reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1000>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+};
+ };
+
+...
--
2.28.0
