Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:34:37AM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > >... > >>+static int > >>+bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, > >>+ void *data, size_t size) > >>+{ > >>+ u32 kver; > >>+ if (size < sizeof(kver)) { > >shouldn't it be '!=' ? > > Is it possible that LLVM pads 'version' section so the size of it becomes > longer than sizeof(u32)? llvm will not be padding a section unless user asks for it. Try objdump on *_kern.o -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On 2015/5/28 9:48, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:19:44AM +, Wang Nan wrote: Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan --- ... +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size < sizeof(kver)) { shouldn't it be '!=' ? Is it possible that LLVM pads 'version' section so the size of it becomes longer than sizeof(u32)? Thank you. + pr_warning("invalid kver section in %s\n", obj->path); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(, data, sizeof(kver)); + obj->kern_version = kver; + pr_debug("kernel version of %s is %x\n", obj->path, +obj->kern_version); + return 0; +} + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:19:44AM +, Wang Nan wrote: > Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version > information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section > named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section > named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. > > bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. > Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan > --- ... > +static int > +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, > + void *data, size_t size) > +{ > + u32 kver; > + if (size < sizeof(kver)) { shouldn't it be '!=' ? > + pr_warning("invalid kver section in %s\n", obj->path); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + memcpy(, data, sizeof(kver)); > + obj->kern_version = kver; > + pr_debug("kernel version of %s is %x\n", obj->path, > + obj->kern_version); > + return 0; > +} > + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On 2015/5/28 9:48, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:19:44AM +, Wang Nan wrote: Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan wangn...@huawei.com --- ... +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size sizeof(kver)) { shouldn't it be '!=' ? Is it possible that LLVM pads 'version' section so the size of it becomes longer than sizeof(u32)? Thank you. + pr_warning(invalid kver section in %s\n, obj-path); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(kver, data, sizeof(kver)); + obj-kern_version = kver; + pr_debug(kernel version of %s is %x\n, obj-path, +obj-kern_version); + return 0; +} + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:19:44AM +, Wang Nan wrote: Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan wangn...@huawei.com --- ... +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size sizeof(kver)) { shouldn't it be '!=' ? + pr_warning(invalid kver section in %s\n, obj-path); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(kver, data, sizeof(kver)); + obj-kern_version = kver; + pr_debug(kernel version of %s is %x\n, obj-path, + obj-kern_version); + return 0; +} + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:34:37AM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: ... +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size sizeof(kver)) { shouldn't it be '!=' ? Is it possible that LLVM pads 'version' section so the size of it becomes longer than sizeof(u32)? llvm will not be padding a section unless user asks for it. Try objdump on *_kern.o -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 52 ++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 16e47a3..15525ad 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -81,6 +82,8 @@ void libbpf_set_print(int (*warn)(const char *format, ...), #endif struct bpf_object { + char license[64]; + u32 kern_version; /* * Information when doing elf related work. Only valid if fd * is valid. @@ -197,6 +200,32 @@ mismatch: return -EINVAL; } +static int +bpf_object__init_license(struct bpf_object *obj, +void *data, size_t size) +{ + memcpy(obj->license, data, + min(size, sizeof(obj->license) - 1)); + pr_debug("license of %s is %s\n", obj->path, obj->license); + return 0; +} + +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size < sizeof(kver)) { + pr_warning("invalid kver section in %s\n", obj->path); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(, data, sizeof(kver)); + obj->kern_version = kver; + pr_debug("kernel version of %s is %x\n", obj->path, +obj->kern_version); + return 0; +} + static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) { Elf *elf = obj->efile.elf; @@ -243,11 +272,32 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) name, (unsigned long)data->d_size, (int)sh.sh_link, (unsigned long)sh.sh_flags, (int)sh.sh_type); + + if (strcmp(name, "license") == 0) + err = bpf_object__init_license(obj, + data->d_buf, + data->d_size); + else if (strcmp(name, "version") == 0) + err = bpf_object__init_kversion(obj, + data->d_buf, + data->d_size); + if (err) + goto out; } out: return err; } +static int bpf_object__validate(struct bpf_object *obj) +{ + if (obj->kern_version == 0) { + pr_warning("%s doesn't provide kernel version\n", + obj->path); + return -EINVAL; + } + return 0; +} + struct bpf_object *bpf_object__open(const char *path) { struct bpf_object *obj; @@ -273,6 +323,8 @@ struct bpf_object *bpf_object__open(const char *path) goto out; if (bpf_object__elf_collect(obj)) goto out; + if (bpf_object__validate(obj)) + goto out; bpf_object__elf_finish(obj); return obj; -- 1.8.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[RFC PATCH v4 09/29] bpf tools: Collect version and license from ELF sections
Expand bpf_obj_elf_collect() to collect license and kernel version information in eBPF object file. eBPF object file should have a section named 'license', which contains a string. It should also have a section named 'version', contains a u32 LINUX_VERSION_CODE. bpf_obj_validate() is introduced to validate object file after loaded. Currently it only check existance of 'version' section. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan wangn...@huawei.com --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 52 ++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 16e47a3..15525ad 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include fcntl.h #include errno.h #include asm/unistd.h +#include linux/kernel.h #include linux/bpf.h #include libelf.h #include gelf.h @@ -81,6 +82,8 @@ void libbpf_set_print(int (*warn)(const char *format, ...), #endif struct bpf_object { + char license[64]; + u32 kern_version; /* * Information when doing elf related work. Only valid if fd * is valid. @@ -197,6 +200,32 @@ mismatch: return -EINVAL; } +static int +bpf_object__init_license(struct bpf_object *obj, +void *data, size_t size) +{ + memcpy(obj-license, data, + min(size, sizeof(obj-license) - 1)); + pr_debug(license of %s is %s\n, obj-path, obj-license); + return 0; +} + +static int +bpf_object__init_kversion(struct bpf_object *obj, + void *data, size_t size) +{ + u32 kver; + if (size sizeof(kver)) { + pr_warning(invalid kver section in %s\n, obj-path); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(kver, data, sizeof(kver)); + obj-kern_version = kver; + pr_debug(kernel version of %s is %x\n, obj-path, +obj-kern_version); + return 0; +} + static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) { Elf *elf = obj-efile.elf; @@ -243,11 +272,32 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) name, (unsigned long)data-d_size, (int)sh.sh_link, (unsigned long)sh.sh_flags, (int)sh.sh_type); + + if (strcmp(name, license) == 0) + err = bpf_object__init_license(obj, + data-d_buf, + data-d_size); + else if (strcmp(name, version) == 0) + err = bpf_object__init_kversion(obj, + data-d_buf, + data-d_size); + if (err) + goto out; } out: return err; } +static int bpf_object__validate(struct bpf_object *obj) +{ + if (obj-kern_version == 0) { + pr_warning(%s doesn't provide kernel version\n, + obj-path); + return -EINVAL; + } + return 0; +} + struct bpf_object *bpf_object__open(const char *path) { struct bpf_object *obj; @@ -273,6 +323,8 @@ struct bpf_object *bpf_object__open(const char *path) goto out; if (bpf_object__elf_collect(obj)) goto out; + if (bpf_object__validate(obj)) + goto out; bpf_object__elf_finish(obj); return obj; -- 1.8.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/