Re: [RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-10 Thread Marek Szyprowski

Hi All,

On 2017-08-10 08:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:

clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
changes in v2:
  added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.

  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


For me looks ok although this requires testing and I do not have
Exynos with LPASS (e.g. Exynos5433). Maybe folks from Samsung (Polish
R or HQ as they are working on it) could help (Cced).


Works fine on Exynos5433 based TM2e.

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski 



Best regards,
Krzysztof


diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
*lpass, int mask)
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
  }
  
-static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)

+static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
  {
-   clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   int ret;
+
+   ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
  
  	/* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */

regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
@@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
+
+   return 0;
  }
  
  static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)

@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
void __iomem *base_top;
struct resource *res;
+   int ret;
  
  	lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);

if (!lpass)
@@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   if (ret) {
+   pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+   pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+   regmap_exit(lpass->top);
+   return ret;
+   }
  
  	return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);

  }
@@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct device 
*dev)
  {
struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
  
-	exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);

-
-   return 0;
+   return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
  }
  
  static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {

--
1.9.1


Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R Institute Poland



Re: [RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-10 Thread Marek Szyprowski

Hi All,

On 2017-08-10 08:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:

clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
changes in v2:
  added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.

  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


For me looks ok although this requires testing and I do not have
Exynos with LPASS (e.g. Exynos5433). Maybe folks from Samsung (Polish
R or HQ as they are working on it) could help (Cced).


Works fine on Exynos5433 based TM2e.

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski 



Best regards,
Krzysztof


diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
*lpass, int mask)
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
  }
  
-static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)

+static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
  {
-   clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   int ret;
+
+   ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
  
  	/* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */

regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
@@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
+
+   return 0;
  }
  
  static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)

@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
void __iomem *base_top;
struct resource *res;
+   int ret;
  
  	lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);

if (!lpass)
@@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   if (ret) {
+   pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+   pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+   regmap_exit(lpass->top);
+   return ret;
+   }
  
  	return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);

  }
@@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct device 
*dev)
  {
struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
  
-	exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);

-
-   return 0;
+   return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
  }
  
  static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {

--
1.9.1


Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R Institute Poland



Re: [RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-10 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
> we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
> If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
> ---
> changes in v2:
>  added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.
> 
>  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>

For me looks ok although this requires testing and I do not have
Exynos with LPASS (e.g. Exynos5433). Maybe folks from Samsung (Polish
R or HQ as they are working on it) could help (Cced).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
> *lpass, int mask)
>   regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
>  }
>  
> -static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
> +static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
>  {
> - clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>  
>   /* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */
>   regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
> @@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
> +
> + return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
> @@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
>   void __iomem *base_top;
>   struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
>  
>   lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!lpass)
> @@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
>   pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>   pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> + ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> + if (ret) {
> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> + regmap_exit(lpass->top);
> + return ret;
> + }
>  
>   return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>  }
> @@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct 
> device *dev)
>  {
>   struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> - exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 


Re: [RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-10 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
> we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
> If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
> ---
> changes in v2:
>  added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.
> 
>  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>

For me looks ok although this requires testing and I do not have
Exynos with LPASS (e.g. Exynos5433). Maybe folks from Samsung (Polish
R or HQ as they are working on it) could help (Cced).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
> *lpass, int mask)
>   regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
>  }
>  
> -static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
> +static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
>  {
> - clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>  
>   /* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */
>   regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
> @@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
>   exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
> +
> + return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
> @@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
>   void __iomem *base_top;
>   struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
>  
>   lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!lpass)
> @@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
>   pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>   pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> + ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> + if (ret) {
> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> + regmap_exit(lpass->top);
> + return ret;
> + }
>  
>   return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>  }
> @@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct 
> device *dev)
>  {
>   struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> - exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 


[RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-08 Thread Arvind Yadav
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
changes in v2:
 added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.

 drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
*lpass, int mask)
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
 }
 
-static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
+static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
 {
-   clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   int ret;
+
+   ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
 
/* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
@@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
+
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
void __iomem *base_top;
struct resource *res;
+   int ret;
 
lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lpass)
@@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   if (ret) {
+   pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+   pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+   regmap_exit(lpass->top);
+   return ret;
+   }
 
return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 }
@@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct device 
*dev)
 {
struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
-
-   return 0;
+   return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
 }
 
 static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {
-- 
1.9.1



[RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

2017-08-08 Thread Arvind Yadav
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav 
---
changes in v2:
 added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.

 drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass 
*lpass, int mask)
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
 }
 
-static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
+static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
 {
-   clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   int ret;
+
+   ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
 
/* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */
regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
@@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
+
+   return 0;
 }
 
 static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
void __iomem *base_top;
struct resource *res;
+   int ret;
 
lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lpass)
@@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+   if (ret) {
+   pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+   pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+   regmap_exit(lpass->top);
+   return ret;
+   }
 
return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 }
@@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct device 
*dev)
 {
struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
-   exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
-
-   return 0;
+   return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
 }
 
 static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {
-- 
1.9.1