Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14:50PM -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > > I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at > > > all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this > > > that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount > > > of code savings. > > > > > > I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the > > > gcc optimizer working for function callbacks. > > > > Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of > > ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In > > this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this > > splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a > > bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that > > will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL. > > > > Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in > > fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be > > inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap > > fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL > > fuse_dev_splice_read. > > Yes, I would prefer that, but I'm not the fuse maintainer. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Okay. I'll do my part to prevent the type of proliferation guaranteed to rate high on the respected K-H icky-scale. __splice_p() goes the way of the dodo in favor of the solution presented by Josh. I pray that the Gods of fuse maintenance will look favorable upon the result. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14:50PM -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > > I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at > > all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this > > that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount > > of code savings. > > > > I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the > > gcc optimizer working for function callbacks. > > Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of > ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In > this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this > splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a > bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that > will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL. > > Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in > fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be > inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap > fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL > fuse_dev_splice_read. Yes, I would prefer that, but I'm not the fuse maintainer. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:34:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:05:10AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of
> > > > > > nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
> > > > > > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set
> > > > > > is to
> > > > > > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct
> > > > > > need to be
> > > > > > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > > > > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> > > > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > > index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> > > > > > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > > @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb
> > > > > > *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> > > > > > return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov,
> > > > > > nr_segs));
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > > > > > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file
> > > > > > *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > > > > > struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > > > > size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations
> > > > > > fuse_dev_operations = {
> > > > > > .llseek = no_llseek,
> > > > > > .read = do_sync_read,
> > > > > > .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> > > > > > - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> > > > > > + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> > > > > > .write = do_sync_write,
> > > > > > .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> > > > > > .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > > index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > > @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
> > > > > > loff_t start, loff_t end,
> > > > > > int datasync);
> > > > > > extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > > > > > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > > > > > +#else
> > > > > > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > This needs to go into a different patch.
> > > > > One logical change per patch please. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
> > > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
> > > >
> > > > - Josh Triplett
> > >
> > > The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out
> > > the
> > > syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
> > > allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
> > > squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
> >
> > The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
> > definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
> > of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
> > you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
>
> I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at
> all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this
> that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount
> of code savings.
>
> I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the
> gcc optimizer working for function callbacks.
Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of
ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In
this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this
splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a
bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that
will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL.
Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in
fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be
inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap
fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL
fuse_dev_splice_read.
- Josh Triplett
--
To
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:05:10AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > > > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of
> > > > > nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
> > > > > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is
> > > > > to
> > > > > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need
> > > > > to be
> > > > > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > > > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> > > > > ---
> > > > > fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> > > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > > @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb
> > > > > *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> > > > > return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov,
> > > > > nr_segs));
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > > > > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
> > > > > loff_t *ppos,
> > > > > struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > > > size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> > > > > {
> > > > > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations
> > > > > fuse_dev_operations = {
> > > > > .llseek = no_llseek,
> > > > > .read = do_sync_read,
> > > > > .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> > > > > - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> > > > > + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> > > > > .write = do_sync_write,
> > > > > .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> > > > > .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > > @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
> > > > > loff_t start, loff_t end,
> > > > > int datasync);
> > > > > extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
> > > > >
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > > > > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > This needs to go into a different patch.
> > > > One logical change per patch please. :-)
> > >
> > > Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
> > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
> > >
> > > - Josh Triplett
> >
> > The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
> > syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
> > allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
> > squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
>
> The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
> definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
> of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
> you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at
all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this
that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount
of code savings.
I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the
gcc optimizer working for function callbacks.
Again, don't do this please.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops.
> > > > This
> > > > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
> > > > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need
> > > > to be
> > > > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> > > >
> > > > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> > > > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
> > > > const struct iovec *iov,
> > > > return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov,
> > > > nr_segs));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > > > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
> > > > loff_t *ppos,
> > > > struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > > size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations
> > > > = {
> > > > .llseek = no_llseek,
> > > > .read = do_sync_read,
> > > > .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> > > > - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> > > > + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> > > > .write = do_sync_write,
> > > > .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> > > > .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
> > > > loff_t start, loff_t end,
> > > > int datasync);
> > > > extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > > > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > > > +#else
> > > > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > >
> > > This needs to go into a different patch.
> > > One logical change per patch please. :-)
> >
> > Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
> > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
> >
> > - Josh Triplett
>
> The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
> syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
> allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
> squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops.
> > > This
> > > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
> > > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to
> > > be
> > > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> > >
> > > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> > > ---
> > > fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> > > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> > > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
> > > const struct iovec *iov,
> > > return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
> > > loff_t *ppos,
> > > struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> > > {
> > > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
> > > .llseek = no_llseek,
> > > .read = do_sync_read,
> > > .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> > > - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> > > + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> > > .write = do_sync_write,
> > > .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> > > .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
> > > start, loff_t end,
> > > int datasync);
> > > extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > > +#else
> > > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> >
> > This needs to go into a different patch.
> > One logical change per patch please. :-)
>
> Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
> CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
>
> - Josh Triplett
The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
Is this agreeable?
PATCH 5 does the same as this one for net/core. Should I still keep PATCH 5
separate from a maintainership perspective?
- Pieter Smith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops.
This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to
be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
const struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
Is this agreeable?
PATCH 5 does the same as this one for net/core. Should I still keep PATCH 5
separate from a maintainership perspective?
- Pieter Smith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops.
This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need
to be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
const struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov,
nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations
= {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
loff_t start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:05:10AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of
nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is
to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need
to be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb
*iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov,
nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in,
loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations
fuse_dev_operations = {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
loff_t start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out the
syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at
all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this
that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount
of code savings.
I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the
gcc optimizer working for function callbacks.
Again, don't do this please.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:34:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:05:10AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of
nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set
is to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct
need to be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb
*iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov,
nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file
*in, loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations
fuse_dev_operations = {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp,
loff_t start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
The patch introducing CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE (PATCH 3) only compiles out
the
syscalls. PATCH 6 on the other hand, compiles out fs/splice.c. This patch
allows fs/fuse to be compiled when fs/splice.c is compiled out. If I am to
squash it, it would be logical to include it in PATCH 6, not 3.
The suggestion wasn't to move the fs/fuse/dev.c bits; those should
definitely stay in this patch. The suggestion was just to move the bit
of the patch defining __splice_p from this patch to patch 3. (Note that
you need to define it before you use it, so it can't go in patch 6.)
I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at
all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this
that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount
of code savings.
I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the
gcc optimizer working for function callbacks.
Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of
ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In
this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this
splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a
bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that
will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL.
Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in
fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be
inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap
fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL
fuse_dev_splice_read.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14:50PM -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount of code savings. I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the gcc optimizer working for function callbacks. Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL. Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL fuse_dev_splice_read. Yes, I would prefer that, but I'm not the fuse maintainer. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:22:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:14:50PM -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: I would, again, argue that stuff like __splice_p() not be implemented at all please. It will only cause a huge proliferation of stuff like this that will not make any sense, and only cause a trivial, if any, amount of code savings. I thought you were going to not do this type of thing until you got the gcc optimizer working for function callbacks. Compared to the previous patchset, there are now only two instances of ifdefs outside of the splice code for this, and this is one of them. In this case, the issue is no longer about making the code for this splice_read function disappear, but rather to eliminate a reference to a bit of splice functionality (used *inside* the FUSE splice code) that will not work without SPLICE_SYSCALL. Would you prefer to see this specific case handled via an #ifdef in fs/fuse/dev.c rather than introducing a __splice_p that people might be inclined to propagate? That'd be fine; the code could simply wrap fuse_dev_splice_read in an #ifdef and have the #else define a NULL fuse_dev_splice_read. Yes, I would prefer that, but I'm not the fuse maintainer. thanks, greg k-h Okay. I'll do my part to prevent the type of proliferation guaranteed to rate high on the respected K-H icky-scale. __splice_p() goes the way of the dodo in favor of the solution presented by Josh. I pray that the Gods of fuse maintenance will look favorable upon the result. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
> > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
> > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to be
> > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> >
> > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
> > const struct iovec *iov,
> > return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
> > }
> >
> > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t
> > *ppos,
> > struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
> > .llseek = no_llseek,
> > .read = do_sync_read,
> > .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> > - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> > + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> > .write = do_sync_write,
> > .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> > .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
> > start, loff_t end,
> > int datasync);
> > extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> > +#define __splice_p(x) x
> > +#else
> > +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> This needs to go into a different patch.
> One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith wrote:
> To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
> struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
> completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to be
> compiled out along with fs/splice.
>
> This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith
> ---
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const
> struct iovec *iov,
> return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, , iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
> }
>
> -static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
> +static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t
> *ppos,
> struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
> .llseek = no_llseek,
> .read = do_sync_read,
> .aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
> - .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
> + .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
> .write = do_sync_write,
> .aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
> .splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index a957d43..04c0975 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
> start, loff_t end,
> int datasync);
> extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
> +#define __splice_p(x) x
> +#else
> +#define __splice_p(x) NULL
> +#endif
> +
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const
struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t
*ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH 4/6] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl wrote:
To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to be
compiled out along with fs/splice.
This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith pie...@boesman.nl
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index ca88731..f8f92a4 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
const struct iovec *iov,
return fuse_dev_do_read(fc, file, cs, iov_length(iov, nr_segs));
}
-static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
+static ssize_t __maybe_unused fuse_dev_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t
*ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
size_t len, unsigned int flags)
{
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ const struct file_operations fuse_dev_operations = {
.llseek = no_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.aio_read = fuse_dev_read,
- .splice_read= fuse_dev_splice_read,
+ .splice_read= __splice_p(fuse_dev_splice_read),
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = fuse_dev_write,
.splice_write = fuse_dev_splice_write,
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a957d43..04c0975 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2443,6 +2443,12 @@ extern int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t
start, loff_t end,
int datasync);
extern void block_sync_page(struct page *page);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE
+#define __splice_p(x) x
+#else
+#define __splice_p(x) NULL
+#endif
+
This needs to go into a different patch.
One logical change per patch please. :-)
Easy enough to merge this one into the patch introducing
CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE, then.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
