On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:52:13PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Julia, > > > > On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 21:00, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >> That's clearly a false positive. Is there anything what can be done to > > >> help that cocci script here? > > > > > > I have a better version that needs to get pushed. > > > > > > But normally these pass through me. Did you get it directly from kbuild? > > > > Yes, because I touched the affected lines last :) > > Actually, that's not the point. Normally, I get all the reports on this > case, and then I forward them if they look ok. If I forwarded something > incorrect, then sorry about that. If the policy has changed for this rule > to be sending the reports out directlty to the recipients, then I think it > should be changed back. There are a lot of real bugs with lock usage, but > there are alot of false positives too. Specifically, the rule looks for > the case with identical if tests, but only when the branches are identical > too. > > Kbuild people, can this be adjusted? Or have I misunderstood the > situation? Hi Julia and Thomas, pls allow us to check this further, usually all cocci reports will be sent to kbu...@01.org for Julia to check. But there maybe something wrong with this report. We will check the detail in next week as we have server maintainance during the weekend.
> > thanks, > julia > _______________________________________________ > kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-...@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-le...@lists.01.org
