Subject: [patch] suspend: fix suspend on single-CPU systems
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clark Williams reported that suspend doesnt work on his laptop on
2.6.20-rc1-rt kernels. The bug was introduced by the following cleanup
commit:
commit 112cecb2cc0e7341db92281ba04b26c41bb8146d
Author: Siddha, Suresh B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Dec 6 20:34:31 2006 -0800
[PATCH] suspend: don't change cpus_allowed for task initiating the suspend
because with this change 'error' is not initialized to 0 anymore, if
there are no other online CPUs. (i.e. if the system is single-CPU).
the fix is the initialize it to 0. The really weird thing is that my
version of gcc does not warn about this non-initialized variable
situation ...
(also fix the kernel printk in the error branch, it was missing a
newline)
Reported-by: Clark Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
kernel/cpu.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/cpu.c
===
--- linux.orig/kernel/cpu.c
+++ linux/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static cpumask_t frozen_cpus;
int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- int cpu, first_cpu, error;
+ int cpu, first_cpu, error = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
first_cpu = first_cpu(cpu_present_map);
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
/* Make sure the CPUs won't be enabled by someone else */
cpu_hotplug_disabled = 1;
} else {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Non-boot CPUs are not disabled");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "Non-boot CPUs are not disabled\n");
}
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
