Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
* Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 > > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. > > > > I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup > > and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and > > stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. > > As much as I'd love to see markers as soon as possible I have to agree. > > I really hate how the first post of a handfull easy patches touching > almost no core code has turned into this gigantic series. > > Matthew, any chance you could resurrect a trivial, no-optimizations > marker variant that has so little impact it could go into 2.6.24? > > I'd really love to have the infrastructure there so we can add optimizations > in parallel with actually adding the users to the tree. Sure, I'll prepare that. -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 > Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. > > I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup > and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and > stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. As much as I'd love to see markers as soon as possible I have to agree. I really hate how the first post of a handfull easy patches touching almost no core code has turned into this gigantic series. Matthew, any chance you could resurrect a trivial, no-optimizations marker variant that has so little impact it could go into 2.6.24? I'd really love to have the infrastructure there so we can add optimizations in parallel with actually adding the users to the tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. As much as I'd love to see markers as soon as possible I have to agree. I really hate how the first post of a handfull easy patches touching almost no core code has turned into this gigantic series. Matthew, any chance you could resurrect a trivial, no-optimizations marker variant that has so little impact it could go into 2.6.24? I'd really love to have the infrastructure there so we can add optimizations in parallel with actually adding the users to the tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
* Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. As much as I'd love to see markers as soon as possible I have to agree. I really hate how the first post of a handfull easy patches touching almost no core code has turned into this gigantic series. Matthew, any chance you could resurrect a trivial, no-optimizations marker variant that has so little impact it could go into 2.6.24? I'd really love to have the infrastructure there so we can add optimizations in parallel with actually adding the users to the tree. Sure, I'll prepare that. -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:06:01 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. I think I'll duck these one more time. There was a bit of followup and for now I'd prefer to concentrate on obviously-safe stuff and stabilisation of the current 2.6.24 queue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
Hi Andrew, Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. Patch order: kprobes-use-mutex-for-insn-pages.patch kprobes-dont-use-kprobes-mutex-in-arch-code.patch kprobes-declare-kprobes-mutex-static.patch declare-array.patch text-edit-lock-architecture-independent-code.patch text-edit-lock-alternative-i386-and-x86_64.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-architecture-independent.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-i386.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-x86_64.patch text-edit-lock-i386-standardize-debug-rodata.patch text-edit-lock-x86_64-standardize-debug-rodata.patch Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[patch 00/11] Text Edit Lock for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
Hi Andrew, Here are the text edit lock patches ported to 2.6.23-rc6-mm1. Patch order: kprobes-use-mutex-for-insn-pages.patch kprobes-dont-use-kprobes-mutex-in-arch-code.patch kprobes-declare-kprobes-mutex-static.patch declare-array.patch text-edit-lock-architecture-independent-code.patch text-edit-lock-alternative-i386-and-x86_64.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-architecture-independent.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-i386.patch text-edit-lock-kprobes-x86_64.patch text-edit-lock-i386-standardize-debug-rodata.patch text-edit-lock-x86_64-standardize-debug-rodata.patch Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
