Re: [patch 11/35] net: ionic: Replace in_interrupt() usage.

2020-09-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, Sep 28 2020 at 12:51, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 9/28/20 10:24 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>>> ionic_lif_addr() can be called from:
>>>
>>>   1) ->ndo_set_rx_mode() which is under netif_addr_lock_bh()) so it 
>>> must not
>>>  sleep.
>>>
>>>   2) Init and setup functions which are in fully preemptible task 
>>> context.
>>>
>>> _ionic_lif_rx_mode() has only one call path with BH disabled.
>
> Now that I've had my coffee, let's look at this again - there are 
> multiple paths that get us to _ionic_lif_rx_mode():
>
> .ndo_set_rx_mode
>    ionic_set_rx_mode,
>      _ionic_lif_rx_mode
>
> { ionic_open, ionic_lif_handle_fw_up, ionic_start_queues_reconfig }
>      ionic_txrx_init
>    ionic_set_rx_mode
>      _ionic_lif_rx_mode

Hrm. Let me stare at it again...


Re: [patch 11/35] net: ionic: Replace in_interrupt() usage.

2020-09-28 Thread Shannon Nelson

On 9/28/20 10:24 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:

On 9/27/20 12:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 

The in_interrupt() usage in this driver tries to figure out which 
context

may sleep and which context may not sleep. in_interrupt() is not really
suitable as it misses both preemption disabled and interrupt disabled
invocations from task context.

Conditionals like that in driver code are frowned upon in general 
because

invocations of functions from invalid contexts might not be detected
as the conditional papers over it.

ionic_lif_addr() can be called from:

  1) ->ndo_set_rx_mode() which is under netif_addr_lock_bh()) so it 
must not

 sleep.

  2) Init and setup functions which are in fully preemptible task 
context.


_ionic_lif_rx_mode() has only one call path with BH disabled.


Now that I've had my coffee, let's look at this again - there are 
multiple paths that get us to _ionic_lif_rx_mode():


.ndo_set_rx_mode
  ionic_set_rx_mode,
    _ionic_lif_rx_mode

{ ionic_open, ionic_lif_handle_fw_up, ionic_start_queues_reconfig }
    ionic_txrx_init
  ionic_set_rx_mode
    _ionic_lif_rx_mode

We may not want to change this one.

sln





ionic_link_status_check_request() has two call paths:

  1) NAPI which obviously cannot sleep

  2) Setup which is again fully preemptible task context

Add 'can_sleep' arguments to the affected functions and let the callers
provide the context instead of letting the functions deduce it.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Shannon Nelson 
Cc: Pensando Drivers 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org


Acked-by: Shannon Nelson 


---

While reviewing the callpaths, a couple of things were observed which 
could

be improved:

- ionic_lif_deferred_work() can iterate over the list. There is no need
   to schedule the work item after each iteration


I think the original writer's intent was to avoid monopolizing the 
work thread for very long on any one cycle, with the thought that we'd 
be making more use of this than we currently are.  I'll address this.




- ionic_link_status_check_request() could have ionic_deferred_work 
within

   ionic_lif(). This would avoid memory allocation from NAPI. More
   important, once IONIC_LIF_F_LINK_CHECK_REQUESTED is set and that 
alloc

   fails, the link check never happens.


Thanks, I'll fix up that error condition.



- ionic_lif_handle_fw_down() sets IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET. Invokes then
   ionic_lif_deinit() which only invokes cancel_work_sync() if
   IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET is not set. I think the logic is wrong here as
   the work must always be cancled. Also the list with ionic_deferred
   work items needs a clean up.


I'll look at that, thanks.

sln






Re: [patch 11/35] net: ionic: Replace in_interrupt() usage.

2020-09-28 Thread Shannon Nelson

On 9/27/20 12:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 

The in_interrupt() usage in this driver tries to figure out which context
may sleep and which context may not sleep. in_interrupt() is not really
suitable as it misses both preemption disabled and interrupt disabled
invocations from task context.

Conditionals like that in driver code are frowned upon in general because
invocations of functions from invalid contexts might not be detected
as the conditional papers over it.

ionic_lif_addr() can be called from:

  1) ->ndo_set_rx_mode() which is under netif_addr_lock_bh()) so it must not
 sleep.

  2) Init and setup functions which are in fully preemptible task context.

_ionic_lif_rx_mode() has only one call path with BH disabled.

ionic_link_status_check_request() has two call paths:

  1) NAPI which obviously cannot sleep

  2) Setup which is again fully preemptible task context

Add 'can_sleep' arguments to the affected functions and let the callers
provide the context instead of letting the functions deduce it.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Shannon Nelson 
Cc: Pensando Drivers 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org


Acked-by: Shannon Nelson 


---

While reviewing the callpaths, a couple of things were observed which could
be improved:

- ionic_lif_deferred_work() can iterate over the list. There is no need
   to schedule the work item after each iteration


I think the original writer's intent was to avoid monopolizing the work 
thread for very long on any one cycle, with the thought that we'd be 
making more use of this than we currently are.  I'll address this.




- ionic_link_status_check_request() could have ionic_deferred_work within
   ionic_lif(). This would avoid memory allocation from NAPI. More
   important, once IONIC_LIF_F_LINK_CHECK_REQUESTED is set and that alloc
   fails, the link check never happens.


Thanks, I'll fix up that error condition.



- ionic_lif_handle_fw_down() sets IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET. Invokes then
   ionic_lif_deinit() which only invokes cancel_work_sync() if
   IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET is not set. I think the logic is wrong here as
   the work must always be cancled. Also the list with ionic_deferred
   work items needs a clean up.


I'll look at that, thanks.

sln




[patch 11/35] net: ionic: Replace in_interrupt() usage.

2020-09-27 Thread Thomas Gleixner
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 

The in_interrupt() usage in this driver tries to figure out which context
may sleep and which context may not sleep. in_interrupt() is not really
suitable as it misses both preemption disabled and interrupt disabled
invocations from task context.

Conditionals like that in driver code are frowned upon in general because
invocations of functions from invalid contexts might not be detected
as the conditional papers over it.

ionic_lif_addr() can be called from:

 1) ->ndo_set_rx_mode() which is under netif_addr_lock_bh()) so it must not
sleep.

 2) Init and setup functions which are in fully preemptible task context.

_ionic_lif_rx_mode() has only one call path with BH disabled.

ionic_link_status_check_request() has two call paths:

 1) NAPI which obviously cannot sleep

 2) Setup which is again fully preemptible task context

Add 'can_sleep' arguments to the affected functions and let the callers
provide the context instead of letting the functions deduce it.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Shannon Nelson 
Cc: Pensando Drivers 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
---

While reviewing the callpaths, a couple of things were observed which could
be improved:

- ionic_lif_deferred_work() can iterate over the list. There is no need
  to schedule the work item after each iteration

- ionic_link_status_check_request() could have ionic_deferred_work within
  ionic_lif(). This would avoid memory allocation from NAPI. More
  important, once IONIC_LIF_F_LINK_CHECK_REQUESTED is set and that alloc
  fails, the link check never happens.

- ionic_lif_handle_fw_down() sets IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET. Invokes then
  ionic_lif_deinit() which only invokes cancel_work_sync() if
  IONIC_LIF_F_FW_RESET is not set. I think the logic is wrong here as
  the work must always be cancled. Also the list with ionic_deferred
  work items needs a clean up.

---
 drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c |2 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c |   43 +++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.h |2 -
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void ionic_watchdog_cb(struct tim
hb = ionic_heartbeat_check(ionic);
 
if (hb >= 0 && ionic->master_lif)
-   ionic_link_status_check_request(ionic->master_lif);
+   ionic_link_status_check_request(ionic->master_lif, false);
 }
 
 void ionic_init_devinfo(struct ionic *ionic)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void ionic_link_status_check(stru
clear_bit(IONIC_LIF_F_LINK_CHECK_REQUESTED, lif->state);
 }
 
-void ionic_link_status_check_request(struct ionic_lif *lif)
+void ionic_link_status_check_request(struct ionic_lif *lif, bool can_sleep)
 {
struct ionic_deferred_work *work;
 
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void ionic_link_status_check_request(str
if (test_and_set_bit(IONIC_LIF_F_LINK_CHECK_REQUESTED, lif->state))
return;
 
-   if (in_interrupt()) {
+   if (!can_sleep) {
work = kzalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!work)
return;
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static bool ionic_notifyq_service(struct
 
switch (le16_to_cpu(comp->event.ecode)) {
case IONIC_EVENT_LINK_CHANGE:
-   ionic_link_status_check_request(lif);
+   ionic_link_status_check_request(lif, false);
break;
case IONIC_EVENT_RESET:
work = kzalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
@@ -928,7 +928,8 @@ static int ionic_lif_addr_del(struct ion
return 0;
 }
 
-static int ionic_lif_addr(struct ionic_lif *lif, const u8 *addr, bool add)
+static int ionic_lif_addr(struct ionic_lif *lif, const u8 *addr, bool add,
+ bool can_sleep)
 {
struct ionic *ionic = lif->ionic;
struct ionic_deferred_work *work;
@@ -957,7 +958,7 @@ static int ionic_lif_addr(struct ionic_l
lif->nucast--;
}
 
-   if (in_interrupt()) {
+   if (!can_sleep) {
work = kzalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!work) {
netdev_err(lif->netdev, "%s OOM\n", __func__);
@@ -983,12 +984,12 @@ static int ionic_lif_addr(struct ionic_l
 
 static int ionic_addr_add(struct net_device *netdev, const u8 *addr)
 {
-   return ionic_lif_addr(netdev_priv(netdev), addr, true);
+   return ionic_lif_addr(netdev_priv(netdev), addr, true, false);
 }
 
 static int ionic_addr_del(struct net_device *netdev, const u8 *addr)
 {
-   return ionic_lif_addr(netdev_priv(netdev), addr, false);
+   return ionic_lif_addr(netdev_priv(netdev), addr, false, false);
 }