Re: [stable] [patch 34/38] kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:53:56PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:41:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:53:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:17PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:31:33 -0800 > > > > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > > > > us know. > > > > > > > > > > > > not ready for -stable yet. if ever for backporting (doubtful) > > > > > > Ok, dropped from -stable, thanks. > > > > For the record I agree with Arjan that it is not yet -stable ready. > > Ok. Then who sent this to the stable alias in the first place? > > Sam, you added the "cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to the patch, and that caused > it to be sent to us when it went into Linus's tree. If you don't want > things like this to go into the -stable tree, don't mark it as such :) When I added the tag I was convinced this was -stable material. Only later the testing done by James revealed that this was bogus and I had long forgotten I added -stable to the patch. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 34/38] kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:41:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:53:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:17PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:31:33 -0800 > > > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > > > us know. > > > > > > > > > not ready for -stable yet. if ever for backporting (doubtful) > > > > Ok, dropped from -stable, thanks. > > For the record I agree with Arjan that it is not yet -stable ready. Ok. Then who sent this to the stable alias in the first place? Sam, you added the "cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" to the patch, and that caused it to be sent to us when it went into Linus's tree. If you don't want things like this to go into the -stable tree, don't mark it as such :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 34/38] kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:41:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:53:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:17PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:31:33 -0800 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. not ready for -stable yet. if ever for backporting (doubtful) Ok, dropped from -stable, thanks. For the record I agree with Arjan that it is not yet -stable ready. Ok. Then who sent this to the stable alias in the first place? Sam, you added the cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the patch, and that caused it to be sent to us when it went into Linus's tree. If you don't want things like this to go into the -stable tree, don't mark it as such :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [stable] [patch 34/38] kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:53:56PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:41:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:53:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:46:17PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:31:33 -0800 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2.6.24-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. not ready for -stable yet. if ever for backporting (doubtful) Ok, dropped from -stable, thanks. For the record I agree with Arjan that it is not yet -stable ready. Ok. Then who sent this to the stable alias in the first place? Sam, you added the cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the patch, and that caused it to be sent to us when it went into Linus's tree. If you don't want things like this to go into the -stable tree, don't mark it as such :) When I added the tag I was convinced this was -stable material. Only later the testing done by James revealed that this was bogus and I had long forgotten I added -stable to the patch. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
