Re: [uml-devel] [patch] Make User Mode Linux compile in 2.6.11-rc3
On Saturday 05 February 2005 01:00 pm, Frank Sorenson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rob Landley wrote: > | As of yesterday afternoon, the UML build still breaks in > | sys_call_table.c, ... > This patch for sys_call_table.c was merged into the main tree in this > changeset: > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ChangeSet >@-2d > > The patch fixes both the sys_call_table and the pud_alloc breakage, and > as of 2.6.11-rc3-bk2, the main tree compiles again for UML. Verified. 2.6.11-rc3-bk2 does indeed build, and the result is chugging through my big compile script. It seems to be working fine, although ye olde display glitch is still there: binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunbin64.rd binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/lde/ld-/ld-sld-spd-spa-sparsparcparc/arc/trc/tlc/tls/tlsstlssulssunssunbsunbiunbinnbin6bin64in64.n64.s64.s4.s.ss binubinutinutinutilutilstils-ils-2ls-2.s-2.1-2.142.14/.14/l14/ld4/ld//ld/tld/ted/tes/testtestsestsustsuitsuitsuiteuite/ite/lte/lde/ld-/ld-sld-spd-spa-sparsparcparc/tlssunbin64.sd binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunbin64.td But that's a purely cosmetic bug. Thanks, Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [uml-devel] [patch] Make User Mode Linux compile in 2.6.11-rc3
On Saturday 05 February 2005 01:00 pm, Frank Sorenson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Landley wrote: | As of yesterday afternoon, the UML build still breaks in | sys_call_table.c, ... This patch for sys_call_table.c was merged into the main tree in this changeset: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ChangeSet @-2d The patch fixes both the sys_call_table and the pud_alloc breakage, and as of 2.6.11-rc3-bk2, the main tree compiles again for UML. Verified. 2.6.11-rc3-bk2 does indeed build, and the result is chugging through my big compile script. It seems to be working fine, although ye olde display glitch is still there: binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunbin64.rd binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/lde/ld-/ld-sld-spd-spa-sparsparcparc/arc/trc/tlc/tls/tlsstlssulssunssunbsunbiunbinnbin6bin64in64.n64.s64.s4.s.ss binubinutinutinutilutilstils-ils-2ls-2.s-2.1-2.142.14/.14/l14/ld4/ld//ld/tld/ted/tes/testtestsestsustsuitsuitsuiteuite/ite/lte/lde/ld-/ld-sld-spd-spa-sparsparcparc/tlssunbin64.sd binutils-2.14/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunbin64.td But that's a purely cosmetic bug. Thanks, Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [uml-devel] [patch] Make User Mode Linux compile in 2.6.11-rc3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Landley wrote: | As of yesterday afternoon, the UML build still breaks in sys_call_table.c, | here's the patch I submitted earlier (which got me past the break when I | tried it). Last week, this produced what seemed like a working UML. | | Now there's a second break in mm/memory.c: the move to four level page | tables conflicts with a stub in our headers. Not quite sure how to fix that. | Jeff? | | (Yeah, I know Andrew's tree works. But wouldn't it be nice if the kernel.org | tree to worked too, before 2.6.11 release.) This patch for sys_call_table.c was merged into the main tree in this changeset: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] The patch fixes both the sys_call_table and the pud_alloc breakage, and as of 2.6.11-rc3-bk2, the main tree compiles again for UML. Andrew's tree, however, (at least 2.6.11-rc3-mm1) requires the patch I sent out yesterday in the message titled "Fix compilation of UML after the stack-randomization patches." Frank - -- Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK Systems Manager, Computer Science Department Brigham Young University [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCBQlRaI0dwg4A47wRAjJ8AJ9CKD/aXaz1TS9QfOO11vcsv+57BACg1CdJ GR0ukCKAabFtJs5rVsPItGg= =h/on -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [uml-devel] [patch] Make User Mode Linux compile in 2.6.11-rc3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Landley wrote: | As of yesterday afternoon, the UML build still breaks in sys_call_table.c, | here's the patch I submitted earlier (which got me past the break when I | tried it). Last week, this produced what seemed like a working UML. | | Now there's a second break in mm/memory.c: the move to four level page | tables conflicts with a stub in our headers. Not quite sure how to fix that. | Jeff? | | (Yeah, I know Andrew's tree works. But wouldn't it be nice if the kernel.org | tree to worked too, before 2.6.11 release.) This patch for sys_call_table.c was merged into the main tree in this changeset: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] The patch fixes both the sys_call_table and the pud_alloc breakage, and as of 2.6.11-rc3-bk2, the main tree compiles again for UML. Andrew's tree, however, (at least 2.6.11-rc3-mm1) requires the patch I sent out yesterday in the message titled Fix compilation of UML after the stack-randomization patches. Frank - -- Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK Systems Manager, Computer Science Department Brigham Young University [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCBQlRaI0dwg4A47wRAjJ8AJ9CKD/aXaz1TS9QfOO11vcsv+57BACg1CdJ GR0ukCKAabFtJs5rVsPItGg= =h/on -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
