Re: 2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:27:24PM +, Russell King wrote: > Keith Owens writes: > Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11: How about we apply both that patch and this one? diff -u linux/Documentation/Changes.old linux/Documentation/Changes --- linux/Documentation/Changes.old Sat Nov 25 11:18:00 2000 +++ linux/Documentation/Changes Sat Nov 25 11:18:28 2000 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ o Gnu make 3.77# make --version o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v -o modutils 2.3.18 # insmod -V +o modutils 2.3.21 # insmod -V o e2fsprogs 1.19# tune2fs --version o pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V o PPP2.4.0 # pppd --version - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:27:24 + (GMT), Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens writes: >> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST), >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven S. Dick) wrote: >> >2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something. >> >I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops >> >messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages... >> >> Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade. > >Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11: Upgrading to modutils 2.3.21 is easier and everybody should do that anyway to fix the local root exploits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
Keith Owens writes:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven S. Dick) wrote:
> >2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
> >I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops
> >messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
>
> Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
--- orig/kernel/module.cWed Nov 22 14:08:23 2000
+++ linux/kernel/module.c Sat Nov 25 10:40:26 2000
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@
/* Ok, that's about all the sanity we can stomach; copy the rest. */
- if (copy_from_user(mod+1, mod_user+1, mod->size-sizeof(*mod))) {
+ if (copy_from_user((char *)mod+mod_user_size,
+ (char *)mod_user+mod_user_size,
+ mod->size-mod_user_size)) {
error = -EFAULT;
goto err3;
}
_
|_| - ---+---+-
| | Russell King[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ - /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something. I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages... Of the three, only the first one decodes to anything useful: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c86bd1e0 printing eip: c4890060 *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP: 0010:[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] EFLAGS: 00010a82 eax: c4890050 ebx: c3fcb400 ecx: c489101c edx: esi: c4891160 edi: c4891160 ebp: c48912d4 esp: c36fbee8 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Process modprobe (pid: 201, stackpage=c36fb000) Stack: c01b74fc c3fcb400 c489101c c3fcb400 c01b7554 c4891160 c3fcb400 c489 c489098c 0001 c4890996 c4891160 c0117d2d c36fa000 08065490 08061760 bfffe164 0001 c488d000 c488d000 c36fbf60 004c c48912c0 Call Trace: [pci_announce_device+44/64] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-8164/80] [pci_register_driver+68/92] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12288/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9844/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9834/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [sys_init_module+1409/1568] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7488/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] [system_call+51/64] Code: 12 89 c4 c1 e2 03 89 44 24 18 89 54 24 1c 40 8b 8a c8 0f 89 The addresses are different, but the stack trace is identical, between test-11(pre1) and test11(final). I think the oops's each correspond to a modprobe. Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something. I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages... Of the three, only the first one decodes to anything useful: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c86bd1e0 printing eip: c4890060 *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP: 0010:[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] EFLAGS: 00010a82 eax: c4890050 ebx: c3fcb400 ecx: c489101c edx: esi: c4891160 edi: c4891160 ebp: c48912d4 esp: c36fbee8 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Process modprobe (pid: 201, stackpage=c36fb000) Stack: c01b74fc c3fcb400 c489101c c3fcb400 c01b7554 c4891160 c3fcb400 c489 c489098c 0001 c4890996 c4891160 c0117d2d c36fa000 08065490 08061760 bfffe164 0001 c488d000 c488d000 c36fbf60 004c c48912c0 Call Trace: [pci_announce_device+44/64] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-8164/80] [pci_register_driver+68/92] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12288/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9844/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9834/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [sys_init_module+1409/1568] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7488/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] [system_call+51/64] Code: 12 89 c4 c1 e2 03 89 44 24 18 89 54 24 1c 40 8b 8a c8 0f 89 The addresses are different, but the stack trace is identical, between test-11(pre1) and test11(final). I think the oops's each correspond to a modprobe. Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:27:24 + (GMT), Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keith Owens writes: On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steven S. Dick) wrote: 2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something. I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages... Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade. Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11: Upgrading to modutils 2.3.21 is easier and everybody should do that anyway to fix the local root exploits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:27:24PM +, Russell King wrote: Keith Owens writes: Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11: How about we apply both that patch and this one? diff -u linux/Documentation/Changes.old linux/Documentation/Changes --- linux/Documentation/Changes.old Sat Nov 25 11:18:00 2000 +++ linux/Documentation/Changes Sat Nov 25 11:18:28 2000 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ o Gnu make 3.77# make --version o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v -o modutils 2.3.18 # insmod -V +o modutils 2.3.21 # insmod -V o e2fsprogs 1.19# tune2fs --version o pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V o PPP2.4.0 # pppd --version - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
