Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Tuesday, 15 of January 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] > > > > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since > > 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know > > of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. > > > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me > > know > > either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of > > the > > entries below are invalid. > > > > > Subject : iptables won't work > > Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2007-12-28 > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657 > > Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The reporter has disappeared, so I guess this wasn't a regression > caused by the kernel but some other mistake. I'll close it as unreproducibl, then. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Subject : iptables won't work Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2007-12-28 References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657 Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The reporter has disappeared, so I guess this wasn't a regression caused by the kernel but some other mistake. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Subject : iptables won't work Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007-12-28 References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657 Handled-By : Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reporter has disappeared, so I guess this wasn't a regression caused by the kernel but some other mistake. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Tuesday, 15 of January 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since 2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Subject : iptables won't work Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007-12-28 References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657 Handled-By : Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reporter has disappeared, so I guess this wasn't a regression caused by the kernel but some other mistake. I'll close it as unreproducibl, then. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sunday, 13 of January 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me > > know either and I'll add them to the list. > > Does this qualify as a regression? I guess so. > I have not seen a fix posted for it yet. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/16/121 > Follow-ups: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/6/228 Thanks for the pointer, I'll add it to the list. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] > > Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with > a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression > report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X > or how the -stable series patches are announced? That's exactly what I'm thinking about. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X or how the -stable series patches are announced? Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] >... I don't think sending the patches around brings much advantage. But I always also Cc'ed all submitters, maintainers and all people somehow involved with one or more of the regressions. This sometimes required splitting the regression lists into 5-7 emails due to some vger rule of dropping emails with IIRC >= 30 recipients, but the required grouping of regressions also had the advantage that you often have regressions that might or might not be related grouped and discussed together. And if you want to push people to work on regressions or get fixes into Linus' tree spamming their INBOX'es with personal copies of regression reports sometimes gets regressions fixed faster... > Thanks, > Rafael cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, That is, the patches pointed to by the "Patch" fields in the list entries. > CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
Today 150 28 14
2008-01-05 139 28 15
2008-01-01 139 38 23
2007-12-21 118 21 13
2007-12-18 115 29 15
2007-12-12 106 31 17
2007-12-08 98 29 19
2007-12-01 85 29 18
2007-11-24 75 25 21
2007-11-19 68 26 21
2007-11-17 65 25 20
Unresolved regressions
--
Subject : EHCI causes system to resume instantly from S4
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-10-28 14:56
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/66
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
Handled-By : "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Workaround : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258#c30
Subject : SError: { DevExch } occuring and causing disruption
Submitter : Avuton Olrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-11-15 22:39
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9393
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : BUG: bad unlock balance detected!
Submitter : Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-11 03:17
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9542
Handled-By : Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5
Submitter : Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-13 16:27
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/13/392
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9557
Handled-By : Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : swapping in 2.6.24-rc5-git3
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-17 14:04
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/98
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9592
Handled-By : Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : Problems on booting
Submitter : "werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-22 14:29
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/22/110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9621
Subject : ACPI or radeon: spontaneous reboot regression
Submitter : Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-22 16:09
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/22/139
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624
Handled-By : Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : iptables won't work
Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-28
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : lockdep warning with LTP dio test (v2.6.24-rc6-125-g5356f66)
Submitter : Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-12-24 18:02
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/24/107
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9670
Subject : kexec buffer error
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008-01-04 22:54
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/4/255
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9693
Subject : wake on lan fails with sky2 module
Submitter : cpo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008-01-09 13:05
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
http://marc.info/?t=11999234931=1=4
Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject : psmouse.c: GlidePoint at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at
byte 1
Submitter : "Vegard Nossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007-11-14 21:26
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/14/363
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9727
Subject : 2.6.24-rc7 -- WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
Submitter : "Miles
2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
Today 150 28 14
2008-01-05 139 28 15
2008-01-01 139 38 23
2007-12-21 118 21 13
2007-12-18 115 29 15
2007-12-12 106 31 17
2007-12-08 98 29 19
2007-12-01 85 29 18
2007-11-24 75 25 21
2007-11-19 68 26 21
2007-11-17 65 25 20
Unresolved regressions
--
Subject : EHCI causes system to resume instantly from S4
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-10-28 14:56
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/66
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Workaround : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258#c30
Subject : SError: { DevExch } occuring and causing disruption
Submitter : Avuton Olrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-11-15 22:39
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9393
Handled-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : BUG: bad unlock balance detected!
Submitter : Krzysztof Oledzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-11 03:17
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9542
Handled-By : Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5
Submitter : Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-13 16:27
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/13/392
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9557
Handled-By : Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : swapping in 2.6.24-rc5-git3
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-17 14:04
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/98
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9592
Handled-By : Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : Problems on booting
Submitter : werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-22 14:29
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/22/110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9621
Subject : ACPI or radeon: spontaneous reboot regression
Submitter : Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-22 16:09
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/22/139
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624
Handled-By : Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : iptables won't work
Submitter : Kristoffer Malmström [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-28
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : lockdep warning with LTP dio test (v2.6.24-rc6-125-g5356f66)
Submitter : Erez Zadok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-12-24 18:02
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/24/107
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9670
Subject : kexec buffer error
Submitter : Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-01-04 22:54
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/4/255
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9693
Subject : wake on lan fails with sky2 module
Submitter : cpo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-01-09 13:05
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
http://marc.info/?t=11999234931r=1w=4
Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : psmouse.c: GlidePoint at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at
byte 1
Submitter : Vegard Nossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-11-14 21:26
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/14/363
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9727
Subject : 2.6.24-rc7 -- WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
Submitter : Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-01-07
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, That is, the patches pointed to by the Patch fields in the list entries. CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] ... I don't think sending the patches around brings much advantage. But I always also Cc'ed all submitters, maintainers and all people somehow involved with one or more of the regressions. This sometimes required splitting the regression lists into 5-7 emails due to some vger rule of dropping emails with IIRC = 30 recipients, but the required grouping of regressions also had the advantage that you often have regressions that might or might not be related grouped and discussed together. And if you want to push people to work on regressions or get fixes into Linus' tree spamming their INBOX'es with personal copies of regression reports sometimes gets regressions fixed faster... Thanks, Rafael cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X or how the -stable series patches are announced? Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X or how the -stable series patches are announced? That's exactly what I'm thinking about. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
