Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX? I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time trying to set up packet writing. Ok, on 2.6.18, I still get the warning about a recursive lock, but no dump regarding a null pointer dereference. The command still fails, however, with pkt_get_last_written_failed. On 2.6.20, I get an error similar to the one I orignally posted (first the recursive lock warning, seconds later, null pointer dereference). Not sure about the recursive lock, but something between .18 and .20 happened such that the packet writing driver didn't fail gracefully. On a side (offtopic) note, I noticed that ACPI support changed for the better in very recent kernels - on both .18 and .20, there were severe and early errors unless I specified acpi=off I'll see if I can figure out exactly where from 2.6.18 to .20 things went wrong, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX? I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time trying to set up packet writing. William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:13:54 + (GMT) William Heimbigner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On running "pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd", I get the following:
>
> [ 3970.461403] =
> [ 3970.482051] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 3970.498210] 2.6.21-rc7 #2
> [ 3970.506062] -
> [ 3970.58] vol_id/8686 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 3970.536576] (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: [] do_open+0x65/0x285
> [ 3970.557104]
> [ 3970.557109] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 3970.574627] (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: [] do_open+0x65/0x285
> [ 3970.595160]
> [ 3970.595161] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 3970.614757] 2 locks held by vol_id/8686:
> [ 3970.626505] #0: (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: []
> do_open+0x65/0x285
> [ 3970.648388] #1: (_mutex#2){--..}, at: []
> mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
> [ 3970.670065]
> [ 3970.670070] stack backtrace:
> [ 3970.683165] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
> [ 3970.698604] [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> [ 3970.711964] [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> [ 3970.725322] [] __lock_acquire+0x12e/0xb93
> [ 3970.740243] [] lock_acquire+0x68/0x82
> [ 3970.754122] [] mutex_lock_nested+0xef/0x275
> [ 3970.769560] [] do_open+0x65/0x285
> [ 3970.782397] [] __blkdev_get+0x73/0x7e
> [ 3970.796279] [] blkdev_get+0x15/0x17
> [ 3970.809638] [] pkt_open+0x95/0xc4e
> [ 3970.822737] [] do_open+0x94/0x285
> [ 3970.835578] [] blkdev_open+0x28/0x51
> [ 3970.849196] [] __dentry_open+0xff/0x1b1
> [ 3970.863594] [] nameidata_to_filp+0x27/0x37
> [ 3970.878770] [] do_filp_open+0x33/0x3b
> [ 3970.892654] [] do_sys_open+0x43/0xc2
> [ 3970.906274] [] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
> [ 3970.919113] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
> [ 3970.934292] ===
> [ 3971.630710] pktcdvd: pkt_get_last_written failed
> [ 3971.645027] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 000e
> [ 3971.670652] printing eip:
> [ 3971.678786] c0161aef
> [ 3971.685361] *pde =
> [ 3971.693761] Oops: [#1]
> [ 3971.702120] PREEMPT
> [ 3971.708722] Modules linked in: udf snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
> i810_audio ac97_codec 8139cp 8139too iTCO_wdt
> [ 3971.741005] CPU:0
> [ 3971.741006] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
> [ 3971.741008] EFLAGS: 00010203 (2.6.21-rc7 #2)
> [ 3971.777034] EIP is at do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2
> [ 3971.789555] eax: 0002 ebx: 8000 ecx: c0182a6b edx: dc8df650
> [ 3971.809878] esi: ff9c edi: 0002 ebp: de336fa4 esp: de336f88
> [ 3971.830200] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
> [ 3971.847674] Process vol_id (pid: 8686, ti=de336000 task=d0b90de0
> task.ti=de336000)
> [ 3971.869812] Stack: cef97000 0003 bf9d7f65 8000
> b7facff4 de336fb0
> [ 3971.895286]c0161b90 de336000 c0103e24 bf9d7f65 8000
> 8000
> [ 3971.920755]b7facff4 bf9d5e08 0005 007b 007b
> 0005 e410
> [ 3971.946228] Call Trace:
> [ 3971.954126] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
> [ 3971.969563] [] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
> [ 3971.985004] [] show_registers+0x1fb/0x33c
> [ 3971.24] [] die+0x107/0x21f
> [ 3972.011984] [] do_page_fault+0x448/0x520
> [ 3972.026644] [] error_code+0x74/0x7c
> [ 3972.040003] [] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
> [ 3972.052841] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
> [ 3972.068022] ===
> [ 3972.078728] Code: f0 78 7e 8b 45 08 89 d9 8b 55 ec 89 04 24 89 f0 e8 82 ff
> ff ff 3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 <8b>
> 40 0c bb 20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
> [ 3972.138557] EIP: [] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
>
> Is this a bug?
>
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:13:54 + (GMT) William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On running pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd, I get the following:
[ 3970.461403] =
[ 3970.482051] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 3970.498210] 2.6.21-rc7 #2
[ 3970.506062] -
[ 3970.58] vol_id/8686 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3970.536576] (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.557104]
[ 3970.557109] but task is already holding lock:
[ 3970.574627] (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.595160]
[ 3970.595161] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3970.614757] 2 locks held by vol_id/8686:
[ 3970.626505] #0: (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2]
do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.648388] #1: (ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [c03d6b54]
mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
[ 3970.670065]
[ 3970.670070] stack backtrace:
[ 3970.683165] [c0104df5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3970.698604] [c010544b] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[ 3970.711964] [c01054fd] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
[ 3970.725322] [c013150a] __lock_acquire+0x12e/0xb93
[ 3970.740243] [c0131fd7] lock_acquire+0x68/0x82
[ 3970.754122] [c03d6c46] mutex_lock_nested+0xef/0x275
[ 3970.769560] [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.782397] [c0182945] __blkdev_get+0x73/0x7e
[ 3970.796279] [c0182965] blkdev_get+0x15/0x17
[ 3970.809638] [c027dbde] pkt_open+0x95/0xc4e
[ 3970.822737] [c01826e1] do_open+0x94/0x285
[ 3970.835578] [c0182a93] blkdev_open+0x28/0x51
[ 3970.849196] [c0161918] __dentry_open+0xff/0x1b1
[ 3970.863594] [c0161a4b] nameidata_to_filp+0x27/0x37
[ 3970.878770] [c0161a8e] do_filp_open+0x33/0x3b
[ 3970.892654] [c0161ad9] do_sys_open+0x43/0xc2
[ 3970.906274] [c0161b90] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3970.919113] [c0103e24] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3970.934292] ===
[ 3971.630710] pktcdvd: pkt_get_last_written failed
[ 3971.645027] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 000e
[ 3971.670652] printing eip:
[ 3971.678786] c0161aef
[ 3971.685361] *pde =
[ 3971.693761] Oops: [#1]
[ 3971.702120] PREEMPT
[ 3971.708722] Modules linked in: udf snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
i810_audio ac97_codec 8139cp 8139too iTCO_wdt
[ 3971.741005] CPU:0
[ 3971.741006] EIP:0060:[c0161aef]Not tainted VLI
[ 3971.741008] EFLAGS: 00010203 (2.6.21-rc7 #2)
[ 3971.777034] EIP is at do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2
[ 3971.789555] eax: 0002 ebx: 8000 ecx: c0182a6b edx: dc8df650
[ 3971.809878] esi: ff9c edi: 0002 ebp: de336fa4 esp: de336f88
[ 3971.830200] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
[ 3971.847674] Process vol_id (pid: 8686, ti=de336000 task=d0b90de0
task.ti=de336000)
[ 3971.869812] Stack: cef97000 0003 bf9d7f65 8000
b7facff4 de336fb0
[ 3971.895286]c0161b90 de336000 c0103e24 bf9d7f65 8000
8000
[ 3971.920755]b7facff4 bf9d5e08 0005 007b 007b
0005 e410
[ 3971.946228] Call Trace:
[ 3971.954126] [c0104df5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3971.969563] [c0104ea7] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
[ 3971.985004] [c01050aa] show_registers+0x1fb/0x33c
[ 3971.24] [c01052f2] die+0x107/0x21f
[ 3972.011984] [c03d9d20] do_page_fault+0x448/0x520
[ 3972.026644] [c03d8594] error_code+0x74/0x7c
[ 3972.040003] [c0161b90] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3972.052841] [c0103e24] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3972.068022] ===
[ 3972.078728] Code: f0 78 7e 8b 45 08 89 d9 8b 55 ec 89 04 24 89 f0 e8 82 ff
ff ff 3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 8b
40 0c bb 20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [c0161aef] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this
didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX? I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time trying to set up packet writing. William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, William Heimbigner wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: It certainly is. Are you able to identify an earlier kernel in which this didn't happen? 2.6.20? An earlier 2.6.21-rcX? I'll try .18 and .20 and see where that gets me - this is my first time trying to set up packet writing. Ok, on 2.6.18, I still get the warning about a recursive lock, but no dump regarding a null pointer dereference. The command still fails, however, with pkt_get_last_written_failed. On 2.6.20, I get an error similar to the one I orignally posted (first the recursive lock warning, seconds later, null pointer dereference). Not sure about the recursive lock, but something between .18 and .20 happened such that the packet writing driver didn't fail gracefully. On a side (offtopic) note, I noticed that ACPI support changed for the better in very recent kernels - on both .18 and .20, there were severe and early errors unless I specified acpi=off I'll see if I can figure out exactly where from 2.6.18 to .20 things went wrong, William Heimbigner [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On running "pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd", I get the following:
[ 3970.461403] =
[ 3970.482051] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 3970.498210] 2.6.21-rc7 #2
[ 3970.506062] -
[ 3970.58] vol_id/8686 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3970.536576] (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: [] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.557104]
[ 3970.557109] but task is already holding lock:
[ 3970.574627] (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: [] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.595160]
[ 3970.595161] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3970.614757] 2 locks held by vol_id/8686:
[ 3970.626505] #0: (>bd_mutex){--..}, at: []
do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.648388] #1: (_mutex#2){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
[ 3970.670065]
[ 3970.670070] stack backtrace:
[ 3970.683165] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3970.698604] [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[ 3970.711964] [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
[ 3970.725322] [] __lock_acquire+0x12e/0xb93
[ 3970.740243] [] lock_acquire+0x68/0x82
[ 3970.754122] [] mutex_lock_nested+0xef/0x275
[ 3970.769560] [] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.782397] [] __blkdev_get+0x73/0x7e
[ 3970.796279] [] blkdev_get+0x15/0x17
[ 3970.809638] [] pkt_open+0x95/0xc4e
[ 3970.822737] [] do_open+0x94/0x285
[ 3970.835578] [] blkdev_open+0x28/0x51
[ 3970.849196] [] __dentry_open+0xff/0x1b1
[ 3970.863594] [] nameidata_to_filp+0x27/0x37
[ 3970.878770] [] do_filp_open+0x33/0x3b
[ 3970.892654] [] do_sys_open+0x43/0xc2
[ 3970.906274] [] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3970.919113] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3970.934292] ===
[ 3971.630710] pktcdvd: pkt_get_last_written failed
[ 3971.645027] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 000e
[ 3971.670652] printing eip:
[ 3971.678786] c0161aef
[ 3971.685361] *pde =
[ 3971.693761] Oops: [#1]
[ 3971.702120] PREEMPT
[ 3971.708722] Modules linked in: udf snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
i810_audio ac97_codec 8139cp 8139too iTCO_wdt
[ 3971.741005] CPU:0
[ 3971.741006] EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
[ 3971.741008] EFLAGS: 00010203 (2.6.21-rc7 #2)
[ 3971.777034] EIP is at do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2
[ 3971.789555] eax: 0002 ebx: 8000 ecx: c0182a6b edx: dc8df650
[ 3971.809878] esi: ff9c edi: 0002 ebp: de336fa4 esp: de336f88
[ 3971.830200] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
[ 3971.847674] Process vol_id (pid: 8686, ti=de336000 task=d0b90de0
task.ti=de336000)
[ 3971.869812] Stack: cef97000 0003 bf9d7f65 8000
b7facff4 de336fb0
[ 3971.895286]c0161b90 de336000 c0103e24 bf9d7f65 8000
8000
[ 3971.920755]b7facff4 bf9d5e08 0005 007b 007b
0005 e410
[ 3971.946228] Call Trace:
[ 3971.954126] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3971.969563] [] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
[ 3971.985004] [] show_registers+0x1fb/0x33c
[ 3971.24] [] die+0x107/0x21f
[ 3972.011984] [] do_page_fault+0x448/0x520
[ 3972.026644] [] error_code+0x74/0x7c
[ 3972.040003] [] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3972.052841] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3972.068022] ===
[ 3972.078728] Code: f0 78 7e 8b 45 08 89 d9 8b 55 ec 89 04 24 89 f0 e8 82 ff ff ff
3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 <8b> 40 0c bb
20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
If any more information is necessary, I'd be happy to provide it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
BUG: Null pointer dereference (2.6.21-rc7)
On running pktsetup 0 /dev/hdd, I get the following:
[ 3970.461403] =
[ 3970.482051] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 3970.498210] 2.6.21-rc7 #2
[ 3970.506062] -
[ 3970.58] vol_id/8686 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3970.536576] (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.557104]
[ 3970.557109] but task is already holding lock:
[ 3970.574627] (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.595160]
[ 3970.595161] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 3970.614757] 2 locks held by vol_id/8686:
[ 3970.626505] #0: (bdev-bd_mutex){--..}, at: [c01826b2]
do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.648388] #1: (ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [c03d6b54] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
[ 3970.670065]
[ 3970.670070] stack backtrace:
[ 3970.683165] [c0104df5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3970.698604] [c010544b] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[ 3970.711964] [c01054fd] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
[ 3970.725322] [c013150a] __lock_acquire+0x12e/0xb93
[ 3970.740243] [c0131fd7] lock_acquire+0x68/0x82
[ 3970.754122] [c03d6c46] mutex_lock_nested+0xef/0x275
[ 3970.769560] [c01826b2] do_open+0x65/0x285
[ 3970.782397] [c0182945] __blkdev_get+0x73/0x7e
[ 3970.796279] [c0182965] blkdev_get+0x15/0x17
[ 3970.809638] [c027dbde] pkt_open+0x95/0xc4e
[ 3970.822737] [c01826e1] do_open+0x94/0x285
[ 3970.835578] [c0182a93] blkdev_open+0x28/0x51
[ 3970.849196] [c0161918] __dentry_open+0xff/0x1b1
[ 3970.863594] [c0161a4b] nameidata_to_filp+0x27/0x37
[ 3970.878770] [c0161a8e] do_filp_open+0x33/0x3b
[ 3970.892654] [c0161ad9] do_sys_open+0x43/0xc2
[ 3970.906274] [c0161b90] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3970.919113] [c0103e24] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3970.934292] ===
[ 3971.630710] pktcdvd: pkt_get_last_written failed
[ 3971.645027] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 000e
[ 3971.670652] printing eip:
[ 3971.678786] c0161aef
[ 3971.685361] *pde =
[ 3971.693761] Oops: [#1]
[ 3971.702120] PREEMPT
[ 3971.708722] Modules linked in: udf snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
i810_audio ac97_codec 8139cp 8139too iTCO_wdt
[ 3971.741005] CPU:0
[ 3971.741006] EIP:0060:[c0161aef]Not tainted VLI
[ 3971.741008] EFLAGS: 00010203 (2.6.21-rc7 #2)
[ 3971.777034] EIP is at do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2
[ 3971.789555] eax: 0002 ebx: 8000 ecx: c0182a6b edx: dc8df650
[ 3971.809878] esi: ff9c edi: 0002 ebp: de336fa4 esp: de336f88
[ 3971.830200] ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
[ 3971.847674] Process vol_id (pid: 8686, ti=de336000 task=d0b90de0
task.ti=de336000)
[ 3971.869812] Stack: cef97000 0003 bf9d7f65 8000
b7facff4 de336fb0
[ 3971.895286]c0161b90 de336000 c0103e24 bf9d7f65 8000
8000
[ 3971.920755]b7facff4 bf9d5e08 0005 007b 007b
0005 e410
[ 3971.946228] Call Trace:
[ 3971.954126] [c0104df5] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[ 3971.969563] [c0104ea7] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
[ 3971.985004] [c01050aa] show_registers+0x1fb/0x33c
[ 3971.24] [c01052f2] die+0x107/0x21f
[ 3972.011984] [c03d9d20] do_page_fault+0x448/0x520
[ 3972.026644] [c03d8594] error_code+0x74/0x7c
[ 3972.040003] [c0161b90] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
[ 3972.052841] [c0103e24] sysenter_past_esp+0x5d/0x99
[ 3972.068022] ===
[ 3972.078728] Code: f0 78 7e 8b 45 08 89 d9 8b 55 ec 89 04 24 89 f0 e8 82 ff ff ff
3d 00 f0 ff ff 89 c7 76 0d 8b 45 f0 e8 dc fb ff ff 89 7d f0 eb 56 8b 40 0c bb
20 00 00 40 8b 70 30 0f b7 56 66 81 e2 00 f0 00 00
[ 3972.138557] EIP: [c0161aef] do_sys_open+0x59/0xc2 SS:ESP 0068:de336f88
Is this a bug?
If any more information is necessary, I'd be happy to provide it.
William Heimbigner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
