Re: Big-ish SCSI disks
75GB 80GB 180GB all work fine... your issues are: location of kernel, below 8GB until you have the chance to turn on lba32 in your lilo.conf... 2GB filesize limit bites people who use large disks more often (well at least in my app), use reiserfs. joelja On Fri, 25 May 2001, Greg Johnson wrote: > Hi kernel poeple, > > Can anyone out there say for certain that 76GB SCSI disks should > just work with kernel versions 2.2 and/or 2.4? We need to get some > big disk space and have heard reports of problems with disks > bigger than 30GB under linux. > > Thanks. > > Greg. > > -- -- Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Academic User Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E -- It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of arms. Karl Marx -- Introduction to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy of the right, 1843. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Big-ish SCSI disks
Greg Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/25 08:51]: > Have you experienced any issues like this? > Have you successfuly built a kernel that booted on these machines? I'm also a user of the machine Scott mentioned. We're booting it off of a smaller scsi disk, not the 76G disks. The disks are partitioned as [mjfrazer@pyle mjfrazer]$ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq 8 08969493 sda 381817 450620 6656780 2095010 544380 197071 5968764 25617960 0 3648250 27741440 8 1 40131 sda1 68 382 900 680 58 23 164 5210 0 5780 5890 8 2 1 sda2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 56835626 sda5 378536 446124 6597282 2077550 543908 194587 5945600 25601060 0 3635020 27707080 8 62088418 sda6 3211 4114 58594 16790 414 2461 23000 11750 0 17190 28540 816 71687369 sdb 5644131 6544183 97506292 29459090 4734971 25903242 245412336 901326350 0 38801430 931623210 817 71681998 sdb1 5644130 6544183 97506290 29459520 4734971 25903242 245412336 901326750 0 38801290 931623950 832 71687369 sdc 5647535 6545287 97542738 29398000 4707634 25931186 245412336 931729050 0 39181580 962005610 833 71681998 sdc1 5647534 6545287 97542736 29398380 4707634 25931186 245412336 931729530 0 39181540 962005420 9 0 71681920 md0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [mjfrazer@pyle mjfrazer]$ -mark > Quoth Scott Murray: > > > > I set up a machine at work a few months ago with two Seagate 73GB > > Ultra160 drives (model ST173404LW) using the Adaptec AIC-7899 adapter > > on board a ServerWorks LE chipset based motherboard. Everything has > > been working fine using the stock RedHat 7.0 2.2.16-22smp kernel. I > > also played with some 2.4.1-ac kernels to try out ReiserFS, and also > > had no problems using the disks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Big-ish SCSI disks
I'm running stock 2.4.4 on five PCs with these features: ServerWorks III HE, 2x 933MHz, 4GB RAM, dual-channel sym53c896 (FAST-40 WIDE) SCSI controller. One PC has the new 181GB Seagate SCSI drive; another uses a 3ware RAID controller with 4x 40GB IDE (looks like a 160GB SCSI drive). All is fine with slackware-current. You might play with "nosmp" and "noapic" kernel params. When building a kernel, disable everything including SCSI: work your way up from IDE or floppy root. SMP failed on our systems until I dumped the slocket-based CPUs for Slot 1. (Still a mystery, that.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Big-ish SCSI disks
Thanks. Interesting that you mention the Severworks LE chipset. We have 2 identical machines with the intel STL MOBO wich uses the Severworks LE. They are both dual PIII 1GHz 1GB mem and ultra 160 drives. I have had nothing but trouble getting RedHat 7.1 beta-1, 7.1 beta-2 and 7.1 release. The OS tended to install ok but on beta1, only the up kernel would boot. On beta-2 and release both up and smp kernels would boot. On neither of the systems have I managed to build a kernel up or smp, new or same version as was installed. When I tried to boot the kernel I had built, the scsi driver would fail to load. This also happen on the Redhat installed smp kernel in beta-1 and on any of the redhat installed kernels in either of beta-2 or release when I tried to use disk striping. Have you experienced any issues like this? Have you successfuly built a kernel that booted on these machines? Regards Greg. Quoth Scott Murray: > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Greg Johnson wrote: > > > Hi kernel poeple, > > > > Can anyone out there say for certain that 76GB SCSI disks should > > just work with kernel versions 2.2 and/or 2.4? We need to get some > > big disk space and have heard reports of problems with disks > > bigger than 30GB under linux. > > I set up a machine at work a few months ago with two Seagate 73GB > Ultra160 drives (model ST173404LW) using the Adaptec AIC-7899 adapter > on board a ServerWorks LE chipset based motherboard. Everything has > been working fine using the stock RedHat 7.0 2.2.16-22smp kernel. I > also played with some 2.4.1-ac kernels to try out ReiserFS, and also > had no problems using the disks. > > Scott > > > -- > = > Scott Murrayemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.spiteful.org (coming soon) ICQ: 10602428 > - > "Good, bad ... I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash, "Army of Darkness" > -- +--+ | Do you want to know more? www.geocities.com/worfsom/ | | ..ooOO Greg Johnson OOoo.. | | HW/SW Engineer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Canon Information Systems Research Australia (CISRA) | | 1 Thomas Holt Dr., North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia | | "I FLEXed my BISON and it went YACC!" - me. | +--+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Big-ish SCSI disks
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Greg Johnson wrote: > Hi kernel poeple, > > Can anyone out there say for certain that 76GB SCSI disks should > just work with kernel versions 2.2 and/or 2.4? We need to get some > big disk space and have heard reports of problems with disks > bigger than 30GB under linux. I set up a machine at work a few months ago with two Seagate 73GB Ultra160 drives (model ST173404LW) using the Adaptec AIC-7899 adapter on board a ServerWorks LE chipset based motherboard. Everything has been working fine using the stock RedHat 7.0 2.2.16-22smp kernel. I also played with some 2.4.1-ac kernels to try out ReiserFS, and also had no problems using the disks. Scott -- = Scott Murrayemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spiteful.org (coming soon) ICQ: 10602428 - "Good, bad ... I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash, "Army of Darkness" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Big-ish SCSI disks
Hi kernel poeple, Can anyone out there say for certain that 76GB SCSI disks should just work with kernel versions 2.2 and/or 2.4? We need to get some big disk space and have heard reports of problems with disks bigger than 30GB under linux. Thanks. Greg. -- +--+ | Do you want to know more? www.geocities.com/worfsom/ | | ..ooOO Greg Johnson OOoo.. | | HW/SW Engineer[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Canon Information Systems Research Australia (CISRA) | | 1 Thomas Holt Dr., North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia | | "I FLEXed my BISON and it went YACC!" - me. | +--+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
