RE: Linux 2.2.18pre6
- Mensaje original - De: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: martes, 12 de septiembre de 2000 17:38 Asunto: Linux 2.2.18pre6 > o Fix rtc race between timer and rtc irq (Andrea Arcangeli) > o Fix slow gettimeofday SMP race (Andrea Arcangeli) > o Check lost_ticks in settimeofday to be more (Andrea Arcangeli) > precise > Can this cause a machine crash after several days (need to power off and restart) if using ntpd to synchronize time? Regards. == Jorge Boncompte - Técnico de sistemas DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnología de las Comunicaciones -- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf:+34 957 761395 / Móvil:+34 696 906252 / FAX:+34 957 450380 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ http://www.dti2.net == Without wicker a basket cannot be done. == - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: Linux 2.2.18pre6
- Mensaje original - De: "Alan Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado: martes, 12 de septiembre de 2000 17:38 Asunto: Linux 2.2.18pre6 o Fix rtc race between timer and rtc irq (Andrea Arcangeli) o Fix slow gettimeofday SMP race (Andrea Arcangeli) o Check lost_ticks in settimeofday to be more (Andrea Arcangeli) precise Can this cause a machine crash after several days (need to power off and restart) if using ntpd to synchronize time? Regards. == Jorge Boncompte - Técnico de sistemas DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnología de las Comunicaciones -- C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5 14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN) Tlf:+34 957 761395 / Móvil:+34 696 906252 / FAX:+34 957 450380 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ http://www.dti2.net == Without wicker a basket cannot be done. == - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
Alan Cox wrote: > [AH>>] > > larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? > > I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core > and picking the important and stable drivers first. On one machine, I have applied ide-2.2.17.all.2904.patch just to get the core effect of CONFIG_IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE=y in drivers/block/ide-disk.c. I can't use any of the specific ide drivers, but it is very good to be free of hda lost interrupt followed by system death. Record uptime for that machine in 2.2.x is about 40 hours. Andre, I'd be glad to extract that portion if there is a chance it will be accepted. Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
> I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the > larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. > I am considering the pull of the backport because I do not have time to do > both directions. If you can hand the backport on then I think that would be a good idea. Getting 2.4 stable is far far more important than the 2.2 backport, and getting taskfile ready for 2.5 likewise. You seem to have a new via maintainer perhaps you can interest him ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
Alan, I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? The ali-driver is straight out of 2.4 or ide-patch with parts of cmd646 taken to actively tune the drive and chipsets. If it is the issue of the taskfile now in my patch, I will pull it if it will prevent me from having to carry this monster around. I am considering the pull of the backport because I do not have time to do both directions. Cheers, Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
Alan, I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? The ali-driver is straight out of 2.4 or ide-patch with parts of cmd646 taken to actively tune the drive and chipsets. If it is the issue of the taskfile now in my patch, I will pull it if it will prevent me from having to carry this monster around. I am considering the pull of the backport because I do not have time to do both directions. Cheers, Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. I am considering the pull of the backport because I do not have time to do both directions. If you can hand the backport on then I think that would be a good idea. Getting 2.4 stable is far far more important than the 2.2 backport, and getting taskfile ready for 2.5 likewise. You seem to have a new via maintainer perhaps you can interest him ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6
Alan Cox wrote: [AH] larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. On one machine, I have applied ide-2.2.17.all.2904.patch just to get the core effect of CONFIG_IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE=y in drivers/block/ide-disk.c. I can't use any of the specific ide drivers, but it is very good to be free of hda lost interrupt followed by system death. Record uptime for that machine in 2.2.x is about 40 hours. Andre, I'd be glad to extract that portion if there is a chance it will be accepted. Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
