Re: MemoryStick / Pro support
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:15:37 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > I also wonder, where do I send the patches if nobody currently maintains > > this thing? > > > > Me, Pierre, lkml? I'm not sure sending it through me is a good idea. I'm having trouble finding time for my current projects, so I will be a bottle neck. That's not a "no", but you have been warned. ;) Rgds Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: MemoryStick / Pro support
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
> MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption
> bug with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The implementation follows the
> MMC driver model (there exist MSIO cards, but none are supported at the
> moment). The MS Pro support appears stable from what I can learn from user
> reports. Nevertheless, I've implemented a couple of diagnostics files in the
> "sys" filesystem, as well as low level format facility for legacy MS cards.
>
> Currently only TI Flashmedia adapters are supported, but I'm working on a
> JMicron JMB38x adapter support and I know for sure that it'll be easy to
> support a Winbond 528 adapter, as I used its GPLed driver as a reference for
> a more generic implementation.
>
> I would like to get an advice on the way to arrange the files in the kernel
> tree. My current idea is:
>
> memstick.h-> include/linux
Or drivers/memstick/. Will anything else need this header?
> memstick.c-> drivers/memstick ("bus" support)
> ms_block.c-> drivers/memstick (legacy MS storage support)
> mspro_block.c -> drivers/memstick (MS Pro storage support)
> tifm_ms.c -> drivers/memstick (TI Flashmedia low level driver)
>
>
>
> I also wonder, where do I send the patches if nobody currently maintains this
> thing?
>
Me, Pierre, lkml?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
MemoryStick / Pro support
After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption bug
with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The implementation follows the MMC
driver model (there exist MSIO cards, but none are supported at the moment).
The MS Pro support appears stable from what I can learn from user reports.
Nevertheless, I've implemented a couple of diagnostics files in the "sys"
filesystem, as well as low level format facility for legacy MS cards.
Currently only TI Flashmedia adapters are supported, but I'm working on a
JMicron JMB38x adapter support and I know for sure that it'll be easy to
support a Winbond 528 adapter, as I used its GPLed driver as a reference for a
more generic implementation.
I would like to get an advice on the way to arrange the files in the kernel
tree. My current idea is:
memstick.h-> include/linux
memstick.c-> drivers/memstick ("bus" support)
ms_block.c-> drivers/memstick (legacy MS storage support)
mspro_block.c -> drivers/memstick (MS Pro storage support)
tifm_ms.c -> drivers/memstick (TI Flashmedia low level driver)
I also wonder, where do I send the patches if nobody currently maintains this
thing?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
