Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 14:58, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network card > > hangs at random (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes > > days). To restart it I need to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it > > will work fine until the next hang. I upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 > > because of the documented tulip fixes, but after a few days got > > this again. The error log shows: > > In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) > > Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes specifically for > this problem. I started having the same problem with my LNE100TX and switched it out with another LNE100TX and had the same problem. Figured it was my BP6 SMP motherboard and ordered a new computer. Doh. :-) Using 2.4.2-ac20. Current LNE100TX having problems (other is different Rev): Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20) The first card would get "unexpected IRQ trap at vector d0" before dying whereas the second one didn't give that indication. It would just freeze and the traditional "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out" message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
I'd looked for changes in tulip between 2.4.2-ac11 and 2.4.2-ac20 and hadn't seen any - that's why I hadn't updated. I gather that the change in question is at a higher level? Anyway, I've upgraded to 2.4.2-ac20 and now I still get the error messages: Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 , resetting... but instead of hanging completely the connection just gets extremely slow and "bursty" as shown by the following fragment of ping output: 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=130 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=358 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=6.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=12.001 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=1.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=368 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=361 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=395 usec So the behavior is quite a bit better (at least I can telnet in to ifdown/ifup) but still not OK. Once again, ifdown/ifup makes things work OK. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Space Ghost: "Hey, what happened to the-?" Moltar: "It's out." SG: "What about-?" M: "It's fixed." SG: "Eh, good. Good." "Jeff Garzik" wrote: > "Manuel A. McLure" wrote: > > > > System: > > AMD Athlon Thunderbird 900MHz > > MSI K7T Pro (VIA KT133 chipset) > > Network card: Linksys LNE100TX Rev. 4.0 (tulip) > > Kernel: 2.2.18 (with 0.92 Scyld drivers), 2.4.0, 2.4.1, > 2.4.2, 2.4.2-ac11 > > > > With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network > card hangs at random > > (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes days). To > restart it I need > > to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it will work fine until the > next hang. I > > upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 because of the documented tulip > fixes, but after a > > few days got this again. The error log shows: > > In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) > > Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes > specifically for this > problem. I'd looked for changes in tulip between 2.4.2-ac11 and 2.4.2-ac20 and hadn't seen any - that's why I hadn't updated. I gather that the change in question is at a higher level? Anyway, I've upgraded to 2.4.2-ac20 and now I still get the error messages: Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 , resetting... but instead of hanging completely the connection just gets extremely slow and "bursty" as shown by the following fragment of ping output: 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=130 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=358 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=6.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=12.001 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=1.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=368 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=361 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=395 usec So the behavior is quite a bit better (at least I can telnet in to ifdown/ifup) but still not OK. Once again, ifdown/ifup makes things work fine until the problem starts again. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Space Ghost: "Hey, what happened to the-?" Moltar: "It's out." SG: "What about-?" M: "It's fixed." SG: "Eh, good. Good." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote: > > System: > AMD Athlon Thunderbird 900MHz > MSI K7T Pro (VIA KT133 chipset) > Network card: Linksys LNE100TX Rev. 4.0 (tulip) > Kernel: 2.2.18 (with 0.92 Scyld drivers), 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.2-ac11 > > With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network card hangs at random > (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes days). To restart it I need > to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it will work fine until the next hang. I > upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 because of the documented tulip fixes, but after a > few days got this again. The error log shows: In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes specifically for this problem. -- Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening, Building 1024 | a full mooon on a dark night, MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote: System: AMD Athlon Thunderbird 900MHz MSI K7T Pro (VIA KT133 chipset) Network card: Linksys LNE100TX Rev. 4.0 (tulip) Kernel: 2.2.18 (with 0.92 Scyld drivers), 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.2-ac11 With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network card hangs at random (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes days). To restart it I need to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it will work fine until the next hang. I upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 because of the documented tulip fixes, but after a few days got this again. The error log shows: In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes specifically for this problem. -- Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening, Building 1024 | a full mooon on a dark night, MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
I'd looked for changes in tulip between 2.4.2-ac11 and 2.4.2-ac20 and hadn't seen any - that's why I hadn't updated. I gather that the change in question is at a higher level? Anyway, I've upgraded to 2.4.2-ac20 and now I still get the error messages: Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 , resetting... but instead of hanging completely the connection just gets extremely slow and "bursty" as shown by the following fragment of ping output: 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=130 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=358 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=6.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=12.001 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=1.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=368 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=361 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=395 usec So the behavior is quite a bit better (at least I can telnet in to ifdown/ifup) but still not OK. Once again, ifdown/ifup makes things work OK. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Space Ghost: "Hey, what happened to the-?" Moltar: "It's out." SG: "What about-?" M: "It's fixed." SG: "Eh, good. Good." "Jeff Garzik" wrote: "Manuel A. McLure" wrote: System: AMD Athlon Thunderbird 900MHz MSI K7T Pro (VIA KT133 chipset) Network card: Linksys LNE100TX Rev. 4.0 (tulip) Kernel: 2.2.18 (with 0.92 Scyld drivers), 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.2-ac11 With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network card hangs at random (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes days). To restart it I need to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it will work fine until the next hang. I upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 because of the documented tulip fixes, but after a few days got this again. The error log shows: In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes specifically for this problem. I'd looked for changes in tulip between 2.4.2-ac11 and 2.4.2-ac20 and hadn't seen any - that's why I hadn't updated. I gather that the change in question is at a higher level? Anyway, I've upgraded to 2.4.2-ac20 and now I still get the error messages: Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Mar 20 14:35:52 ulthar kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 , resetting... but instead of hanging completely the connection just gets extremely slow and "bursty" as shown by the following fragment of ping output: 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=130 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=358 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=6.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=12.001 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=1.000 sec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=368 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=361 usec 64 bytes from leng.internal.mclure.org (10.1.1.1): icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=395 usec So the behavior is quite a bit better (at least I can telnet in to ifdown/ifup) but still not OK. Once again, ifdown/ifup makes things work fine until the problem starts again. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Space Ghost: "Hey, what happened to the-?" Moltar: "It's out." SG: "What about-?" M: "It's fixed." SG: "Eh, good. Good." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out on LNE100TX 4.0, kernel2.4.2-ac11 and earlier.
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 14:58, Jeff Garzik wrote: With all the above kernel revisions/drivers, my network card hangs at random (sometimes within minutes, other times it takes days). To restart it I need to do an ifdown/ifup cycle and it will work fine until the next hang. I upgraded to 2.4.2-ac11 because of the documented tulip fixes, but after a few days got this again. The error log shows: In Alan Cox terms, that's a long time ago :) Can you please try 2.4.2-ac20? It includes fixes specifically for this problem. I started having the same problem with my LNE100TX and switched it out with another LNE100TX and had the same problem. Figured it was my BP6 SMP motherboard and ordered a new computer. Doh. :-) Using 2.4.2-ac20. Current LNE100TX having problems (other is different Rev): Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20) The first card would get "unexpected IRQ trap at vector d0" before dying whereas the second one didn't give that indication. It would just freeze and the traditional "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out" message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
