Re: NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Barry K. Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, > or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried > eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across > all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although > my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) > I have used eepro100's on *a lot* of boxes, including *.kernel.org; haven't had any problems whatsoever any time recently. -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:"Barry K. Nathan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) I have used eepro100's on *a lot* of boxes, including *.kernel.org; haven't had any problems whatsoever any time recently. -hpa -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] at work, [EMAIL PROTECTED] in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
Andrew Morton wrote: > The 3c905C is a well manufactured and very feature-rich NIC which at > present appears to have fewer problem reports than eepro100, 8139 or tulip. 3c905c is a bit expensive, though. pcnet32 cards also work very well for me, and are less expensive. The 905c could be a better card (I don't really know), but pcnet32's might be more cost-effective, depending on your needs. (I've seen pcnet32-based cards selling for $15-20, and I bought a new 10-pack (of HP NightDirector 10/100's) for about $36, including shipping, on eBay.) In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) Anyway, those are my experiences and recommendations. YMMV. :) -Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
Andrew Morton wrote: The 3c905C is a well manufactured and very feature-rich NIC which at present appears to have fewer problem reports than eepro100, 8139 or tulip. 3c905c is a bit expensive, though. pcnet32 cards also work very well for me, and are less expensive. The 905c could be a better card (I don't really know), but pcnet32's might be more cost-effective, depending on your needs. (I've seen pcnet32-based cards selling for $15-20, and I bought a new 10-pack (of HP NightDirector 10/100's) for about $36, including shipping, on eBay.) In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) Anyway, those are my experiences and recommendations. YMMV. :) -Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
