Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:04 AM, Zhang Wei wrote: All right, I'll give you another patch for 86xx dts file. :) Btw: Why the PCI and other nodes were moved from SOC? Just for clear? If they are moved out, their register address must use full address not offset address. we did this because the feeling was the SOC node just represented the IMMR/CCSBAR registers, and not the address space used by the various busses. (this is why pci, rio, and local bus all exist outside of the soc node). - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
All right, I'll give you another patch for 86xx dts file. :) Btw: Why the PCI and other nodes were moved from SOC? Just for clear? If they are moved out, their register address must use full address not offset address. Thanks! Wei. > -Original Message- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:44 PM > To: Zhang Wei > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ . > > Can you post a device tree update as well. > > The older patches on the list for the 86xx .dts should NOT > put the rio > node under the soc. It should be at the same level as PCI. > > - k > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
Can you post a device tree update as well. The older patches on the list for the 86xx .dts should NOT put the rio node under the soc. It should be at the same level as PCI. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
Can you post a device tree update as well. The older patches on the list for the 86xx .dts should NOT put the rio node under the soc. It should be at the same level as PCI. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ .
All right, I'll give you another patch for 86xx dts file. :) Btw: Why the PCI and other nodes were moved from SOC? Just for clear? If they are moved out, their register address must use full address not offset address. Thanks! Wei. -Original Message- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:44 PM To: Zhang Wei Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Change RIO function mpc85xx_ to fsl_ . Can you post a device tree update as well. The older patches on the list for the 86xx .dts should NOT put the rio node under the soc. It should be at the same level as PCI. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
