Re: [PATCH 26/30] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove unused symbols
On 24-04-2013 10:52, Zhang, Rui wrote: -Original Message- From: Eduardo Valentin [mailto:eduardo.valen...@ti.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:12 AM To: amit.kach...@linaro.org Cc: Eduardo Valentin; Zhang, Rui; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux- ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 26/30] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove unused symbols Importance: High The list is needed so far. Thus removing it. s/needed/not needed? yes, thanks. Thanks, rui Cc: Zhang Rui Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 6 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 3709274..825231f 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -38,11 +38,9 @@ * @cpufreq_val: integer value representing the absolute value of the clipped *frequency. * @allowed_cpus: all the cpus involved for this cpufreq_cooling_device. - * @node: list_head to link all cpufreq_cooling_device together. * * This structure is required for keeping information of each - * cpufreq_cooling_device registered as a list whose head is represented by - * cooling_cpufreq_list. In order to prevent corruption of this list a + * cpufreq_cooling_device registered. In order to prevent corruption of + this a * mutex lock cooling_cpufreq_lock is used. */ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { @@ -51,9 +49,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { unsigned int cpufreq_state; unsigned int cpufreq_val; struct cpumask allowed_cpus; - struct list_head node; }; -static LIST_HEAD(cooling_cpufreq_list); static DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); -- 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH 26/30] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove unused symbols
> -Original Message- > From: Eduardo Valentin [mailto:eduardo.valen...@ti.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:12 AM > To: amit.kach...@linaro.org > Cc: Eduardo Valentin; Zhang, Rui; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH 26/30] thermal: cpu_cooling: remove unused symbols > Importance: High > > The list is needed so far. Thus removing it. > s/needed/not needed? Thanks, rui > Cc: Zhang Rui > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin > --- > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 3709274..825231f 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c > @@ -38,11 +38,9 @@ > * @cpufreq_val: integer value representing the absolute value of the > clipped > * frequency. > * @allowed_cpus: all the cpus involved for this > cpufreq_cooling_device. > - * @node: list_head to link all cpufreq_cooling_device together. > * > * This structure is required for keeping information of each > - * cpufreq_cooling_device registered as a list whose head is > represented by > - * cooling_cpufreq_list. In order to prevent corruption of this list a > + * cpufreq_cooling_device registered. In order to prevent corruption > of > + this a > * mutex lock cooling_cpufreq_lock is used. > */ > struct cpufreq_cooling_device { > @@ -51,9 +49,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { > unsigned int cpufreq_state; > unsigned int cpufreq_val; > struct cpumask allowed_cpus; > - struct list_head node; > }; > -static LIST_HEAD(cooling_cpufreq_list); static > DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); > > -- > 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/